mad muffin wrote: » This is what we are dealing with. How about you guys refute all that is stated with factual evidence? I would be surprised if you could refute it all with factual evidence.
mad muffin wrote: » Hey. Since you are the expert on all things English. I mean you’ve pointed it out twice now in my posts. You still haven’t answered why I was wrong in using “odd” I looked it up on google, as you so helpfully suggested. I’ll await your valuable insight.
duploelabs wrote: » Because the post initially was making all these claims with no verification. So we just asked for them to back up that statement, you know how modern debate works
drunkmonkey wrote: » Your claiming the Whitehouse is lying. It's up to you to prove they are. Why don't you just pick a big ticket number like unemployment and show us that's a lie.
duploelabs wrote: » Making a statement and then being asked to be proven wrong belongs in the playground or a purveyor of homeopathy, try harder
drunkmonkey wrote: » So you can't, fair enough, didn't expect the left to have any facts to back up their propaganda shouts...
mcmoustache wrote: » You listed a bunch of stuff that was very much routine and described them as odd. That's not what the word "odd" is for. It's used to describe more unusual events.
mad muffin wrote: » Clearly there is evidence. Can you show me to the contrary?
“Judicial Watch has obtained information indicating Yovanovitch may have violated laws and government regulations by ordering subordinates to target certain US persons using State Department resources.”
“Among search terms monitored… Yovanovitch, Soros, Giuliani, and Biden.
duploelabs wrote: » Please show me this 'evidence' you speak of
mad muffin wrote: » You think it’s not odd? Okay…
mad muffin wrote: What is odd is that this is being done from behind closed doors. What is odd is that the transcripts of the depositions are not released. What is odd is that Schiff keeps leaking cherry picked little tidbits to further his narrative. What is odd is that all of a sudden Schiff says we don’t need the whistleblower anymore. What is odd is that we have the call. We have the Ukrainian President on numerous occasions saying there was nothing to it.
mad muffin wrote: » Are we really going to play this stupid game?
duploelabs wrote: » Yes, please show us this evidence to your statement that you made
Outlaw Pete wrote: » What a bunch of idiots ... CNN have been moaning about Trump intimidating their impeachment "whistleblower" but yet they intimidate the CNN one:https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1184189706009042945 The left always accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
mcmoustache wrote: » OK. Let's look at these in turn. It's not odd that hearings are behind closed doors. Most hearings are. During the Benghazi hearings, for example, every single one was behind closed doors except for Hillary's. This was also the case in the Russian Interference hearings that were led by Nunes. Closed hearings are routine and not odd. It's not odd that transcripts are released yet. While Schiff has committed to releasing them, transcripts are generally delayed while witness testimony is being gathered. Sometimes it can be released quickly and in other cases it needs to be withheld longer periods of time. It's not odd that there are leaks. I've never heard of a hearing where there weren't leaks. It's not odd that he would say the whistleblower's testimony isn't needed any more. If you informed the guards about some travellers robbing your neighbours' gaff and if they showed up catching them in the act and if the travellers admitted what they were doing and also admitted to doing and planning even more, do you think that the guards would need you to show up or would they be happy with just a statement? It's also not odd for someone being blackmailed to deny that they are being blackmailed.
mad muffin wrote: » It was already posted from the White House.
mad muffin wrote: » Okay I see you are going to be completely disingenuous. That’s fine.
“Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible.”
Outlaw Pete wrote: » lol. Biden makes Trump sound like a fcuking genius :pac:https://twitter.com/ChrisStigall/status/1184271384559661056 No wonder the democrats want to impeach him, they've got nobody to beat him.
hetuzozaho wrote: » I see Trump is saying the impeachment is illegal. In what way is it illegal?
drunkmonkey wrote: » It's based on Hearsay. It should have never even got off the ground. I'd question the legality of putting spies in the Whitehouse as well. Even if Trump did ask for help investigating Biden, what about it he was after the Truth not trying to frame him. I think that should be well within a presidents power. He didn't ask anyone to make up a story just wanted to know what the story was. He's doing America a favour, the dims well the dims don't want you to know what actually went on when it comes to Biden, Obama, Hillary.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » The reason why the democrats are so desperate for impeachment was all too apparent last night. Harris actually arguing that Trump should have his Twitter account removed.https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1184293652643958784 Reason being of course, it's the only place they can't control him and twist and lie about what he says.
