FaganJr wrote: » What has?
recyclebin wrote: » Seems strange that it's dual carriageway.
Deleted User wrote: » Is it really necessary, especially when we are supposed to be moving towards a greener economy and society? If the above figure is correct and it works out to a cost of €10,478,260 per kilometre!
[Deleted User] wrote: » Is it really necessary, especially when we are supposed to be moving towards a greener economy and society? If the above figure is correct and it works out to a cost of €10,478,260 per kilometre!
yew_tree wrote: » Yes it is...just we just stop all development and turn the county into a giant nature reserve? I seen similar commmets on the re surfacing of the runway at knock...we need safe good roads and those self driving electric cars that will be all over the place in 20 years will also need good quality roads.
Gagagogo wrote: » Seems like absolute madness to me spending €241M on a dual carriageway from Westport to Turlough. Who even wants this? Fair enough the current Westport to Castlebar road has its faults but why not improve that for a fraction of the cost. Removing some of the bad bends and dips, and increasing the number of pedestrian crossings and cycle lanes is all that is required in my opinion. And probably some re-surfacing to boot. As for the existing Castlebar-Turlough road is that not one of the best roads in the county. If we were investing ridiculous money in our roads there are many roads across Mayo that are in greater need of investment. Castlebar to Belmullet for example. And did the government not declare an environmental emergency. Should we not be encouraging more use of public transport instead of more driving of private cars, because more road will just lead to more cars. Sure there's limited public transport in Mayo but why cant that be improved? Imaging if €241M was spent on public transport/ safe cycling routes etc in Mayo. It would transform the county but instead we're building a new road to replace an existing road. There is of course a rail service running between Castlebar and Westport multiple times a day. Apologies for the rant, just can't get my head around it. Mayo and rural Ireland in general has many problems. This wont fix any of them.
Thou wrote: » If you look at this infrastructural project in the greater scheme of things it has the potential to benefit the county as a whole. As the poster above mentions it will be critical for future investment projects, which will in turn make Mayo a more attractive place to live. As the new road will be central to the Castlebar - Westport hub strategy, it will be interesting to see how plans for that project develop. If Co. Mayo has its own growth center, by effectively combining the towns, the area will act as a counter balance to places like Sligo, Galway and elsewhere in the country. Will hopefully create more opportunities for people to stay and live in Mayo. At the same time it is disheartening to see no real plans going ahead for road improvement or transport projects in North and North West Mayo, especially when you see communities suffer from depopulation and have very little in the way of opportunities, however as already said this project has the potential to improve the entire County longer term.
Deleted User wrote: » Three infrastructure project that i think are badly needed to help Mayo compete. The Ballina - Ballyvary road(including bends between Foxford and Swinford), the Castlebar - Claremorris road, and the Knock - Collooney road. Get Gas and enough electrity connectivity to the county and then its up to the IDA to do their job. After that the nice to haves like the link road improvements and the the greenways could follow, but i think we are looking at the 30's for that.
Lukekul wrote: » Motorway from Sligo down to Cork, Dual carraigeway from westport to claremorris junction, dual carraigeway from leterkenny to sligo. Is that so much to ask? :P
PARlance wrote: » Bypass, or bomb, Roscommon?
Gagagogo wrote: » Seems like absolute madness to me spending €241M on a dual carriageway from Westport to Turlough. Who even wants this? Fair enough the current Westport to Castlebar road has its faults but why not improve that for a fraction of the cost. Removing some of the bad bends and dips, and increasing the number of pedestrian crossings and cycle lanes is all that is required in my opinion. And probably some re-surfacing to boot. As for the existing Castlebar-Turlough road is that not one of the best roads in the county. If we were investing ridiculous money in our roads there are many roads across Mayo that are in greater need of investment. Castlebar to Belmullet for example.
irishgeo wrote: » you need the M4 motorway to come further west too.
Knock2 wrote: » Agree It will benefit the whole county when completed and is a badly needed improvement but the n26 is equally as bad and is a major road into that part of the county so where is the plan for it? Where is the balanced county development? And is it not of equal importance to improve access between the two largest population centres in the county? From my experience of driving around the country I don’t think there is a major town with as poor a road into as ballina( I’m open to correction on that statement) Also if you take county Kerry as an example which would be similar to mayo in a lot of ways( distance from Dublin,western seaboard,emerigation)look at the connection they have between there 2 large population centres Tralee/Killarney it’s a great road why can’t we plan/achieve the same in mayo between Castlebar/Ballina?or am I missing something?
Mickeroo wrote: » I think rather than have the road go out to turlough they should have been looking at claremorris and then joining claremorris to tuam. Motorway all the way to Galway and Dublin from Westport/Cbar then. Sure people are already going via Tuam to Dublin these days for the better road and less congestion on busy days like match days....
runawaybishop wrote: » Ta da! N5 / N26 / N58 Castlebar East to Bohola and Swinford to Mount Falcon Road Projecthttp://www.regdesign.com/?page_id=590 Some good reading on that site.
Deleted User wrote: » They should at least get the money to get it through the design and planning process, probably take 5 years for that anyway.