clsmooth wrote: » So when will Conlan be fighting someone at his level? Seems like he’s been fighting fodder for years now
lbc2019 wrote: » He doesn't endear himself to unionists anyway. He's limited pro boxer. No finishing power. Warrington would destroy him.
megadodge wrote: » Conlan is making steady progress. He's being guided by actual experts at timing boxers' runs - Top Rank. He also has a very good coach and has that drive and confidence that so many other talented sports people often lack. Right now I'm not convinced either Warrington or Frampton beat him. In another year's time I'd fancy him over both. Santa Cruz might have a small bit too much at this stage, but again, in a year or so that would be a very interesting fight. Russell is a bit of an enigma. Serious talent, acquitted himself quite well against the brilliant Lomachenko, but basically fights once a year often against non-descript opposition. He'd beat Conlan right now and I'd still fancy him a year from now, if he's still at the weight. He has been talking about moving up and maybe fighting Gervonta Davis, but as tasty as that is, I'll believe it when I see it. Of course, I can't finish without mentioning the FACT that not being a big puncher never stopped countless boxers all over the years from having successful careers. It's nearly laughable at this stage that the great lover of power is no longer posting here but seems to have been replaced by a whole swathe of similar believers. Power is the most overrated attribute in boxing.
gwalk wrote: » Conlan ranked 3rd with the WBO now, Frampton down to 5th Keeler up to 4th with the WBO too
Morrison J wrote: » Conlan will knock Nikitin out. Great fight for Mick style wise and publicity wise. Don't think Nikitin is any better than Mick's last few opponents.
weemcd wrote: » Conlan will get the decision no matter what way it goes so it's really down to Nikitin getting the KO or stoppage by other means. I'd be slightly tempted to stick a tenner on him all the same... odds will drift closer to the fight as casuals lump on Conlan.
Morrison J wrote: » Have you watched Nikitin in his pro fights to date? Has clearly lost rounds and looked pretty awful. For all the negativity around Mick's pro career so far he hasn't even lost a round in 12 fights to my eyes. Nikitin peaked in the amateurs. Small pressure fighter with 300+ fights. He's 28 now and clearly already regressing. Conlan stops him.
walshb wrote: » I have watched both. Both looked bang average. I cannot see either being so favoured...that is more my point...their caliber of opposition has been dreadful This is like a clean slate fight...Their previous pro fights telling me very little..
Morrison J wrote: » Conlans last few opponents have not been dreadful. Conlan has made them look dreadful. The fella Conlan fought on Paddy's Day this year very nearly beat Isaac Lowe last month. Most scored it a draw, Lowe got the decision. Lowe is a decent fighter who drew with Ryan Walsh. Nikitin wouldn't beat any of these guys. Conlan is already operating at a much higher level. Dunno why it's so hard to understand why he's being favoured.
walshb wrote: » Are you implying the con is on?
weemcd wrote: » I just don't see any way Conlan doesn't win this as he's the A side with Arum backing him.
walshb wrote: » Ok... I don’t disagree. Level playing field do you think 25/1 on here is justified?