Dickie10 wrote: » im a bit the same I officially own the house according to the government /land register etc so a shre of the profit from the farm goes towards keeping the bills paid in the house, esb,intenet, (sky tv for my father!) diy jobs, food etc. my mother pays for the upkeep of her car alright. so im not exactly the same as another 35 year old living at home. in this situation the roles are completely reversed from childhood where I look after the health and upkeep of my parents. health insurance is another big bill. but it has great benefits the person with drive and energy is in charge of keeping the house and bills etc. plus the fair deal scheme will kick in because if in the event of a parent needing nursing home care it will be paid for from their pension because they have no assets in theo#ir name.
Edgware wrote: » But what happens if you bring the local slapper home some night?
3ndahalfof6 wrote: » you need to leave Ireland, go to a country where there is work and get a job, your a big human now time to fly the nest and let mammy have a rest, it will do you the world of good.
mariaalice wrote: » The one going to the uk has saving from a summer job and she got some supprot for me not enough to live on she got a job while studing, the other one lived on fresh air the most she ever asked for was money to buy food eveynow and then she is very independent its her personality. I would help them but not to the point of totaly supporting them. In fact I would say they both got more when living at home that when they moved away. I wouldnt mind if they moved home for a while if they ever needed to as long as they has some plan.
emilymemily wrote: » That little bit of support is likely what enabled them to be able to move out of home and study abroad. A part time job on its own while studying and renting isnt enough to sustain someone while paying rent, bills, food, social life, college fees and supplies. Your other daughter had you as a fall back for money or support when she needed food. If neither of your children had the financial support from you they likely wouldnt have had the opportunities they have like studying abroad and moving out at late teens. I dont think its fair to compare people who have zero support at all to people who have had the support to help get them on their feet. Your kids are privileged. Im sure they have worked very hard but having your support gave them the incentive and ability to do so, if they work a part time job and earn 250 or 300 euro, they also have you to bridge the gap and make ends meet, not all young people have that, they have to support themselves completely, that results in it taking much longer for them to get on their feet, they often have to take the long way around or the slower route to get anywhere and often just as hard workers, sometimes harder but all theyre earning is that 250 euro with nothing else to fall back on. Id also be interested to know how your daughters got their first jobs, did you or a family member or friend have a hand in helping them to secure jobs? Maybe asked around for them? or asked a manager friend if theyre looking for staff to consider your child?
SusieBlue wrote: » Sorry but I don’t agree, I’m only 28 so would have finished school during the height of the recession and by saving during the summers of 4th, 5th and 6th year I was well able to afford my fees working full time on minimum wage. I worked a maximum of about 25 hours a week (not a lot really) during the academic year which gave me about €250 a week to play around with. My rent was €80 per week leaving me with €170 to live off of. During the Christmas holidays etc. I could easily work 60/70 hours a week, which suppplemented me the rest of the year. Now I won’t deny that there were weeks where I was stone broke and lived off of beans on toast, but I survived! Naggins of vodka were €5 and walking home in the rain with a gang of friends was no trouble so I even managed to squeeze in a pretty good social life :pac: I got every job myself, I worked in retail, waitressing, babysitting on the side and a lot of bar work. On more than one occasion I worked more than one job. My parents would have loved nothing more than to help me but unfortunately they weren’t in a position to do so at the time. The responsibility was on me to get myself through it. I’m not for a minute denying it’s hard and I know some people have awful luck when it comes to these things but I really think that if an adult has reached their late 20’s/early 30’s and have never managed to hold down a job or complete a short course then it’s a reflection on them and not their circumstances. Particularly when we’re nearly at full employment levels.
Id Believe Anything wrote: » 33 and living at home. Love it. Not going anywhere soon. Saving a fortune on rent and food. Made a token effort to give the parents rent money but they refused, that was over two years ago. Suck on that one, boomers.
beejee wrote: » Doesn't your ma go home most nights?
shamrock55 wrote: » No child in their 20s should be living with parents, I craved indapendance at that age and moved into a ****ty apartment but I loved it as it was mine, I'd call home regularly for the odd dinner and chat, parents need freedom too, I'm not sure I'd be too happy if my kids were still living with us at that age
Celia Many Ladder wrote: » I love my parents get along great with them but can't live with them. I moved out the day after college at 22. I am 30 now and married. Was home with the parents recently with the wife and it was an absolute nightmare. My mother has no sense of boundaries which is grand I guess and I was used to it. My wife was going mad. One day in the middle of the day I was in bed riding and my mother walked in asking us do we want a cup of tea or some lunch or something. Mortified so I was. She didn't see anything because we were under a blanket but it is very weird to be balls deep in a woman and looking at your mam.
partyguinness wrote: » I think some parents regard their children boomeranging back into the family home as a sign of failure. It hurts.
Tony EH wrote: » I'd be more worried about that third testicle to be honest.
Barely There wrote: » If your still living at home in your mid-20's you'd really want to have a word with yourself. I haven't met anyone living at home with their parents in their 30's who weren't complete and utter lost causes.
Braelyn Fat Toe wrote: » What a stupid post. People vary, family dynamics vary, people's circumstances vary. You certainly don't sound as if moving out of home has made you grow up and broaden your mind in any way. And no, I don't live with my mother, but I respect the many reasons why many adults do. Grow up!
tylercheribini wrote: » I know people that rushed into marriage/mortgage/kids early in life, all went tits up by their 30's and are now back where they started living at home with the folks anyway. I'm curious as to how these people are categorised by the judge,juries and executioners on this thread.
Wildly Boaring wrote: » There are several posters living with parents in 20s and 30s. Any chance of sorting a house share with mates or even complete strangers? Your parent's house may be in a great location and you may need to move out a bit (say dublin out to maynooth).Small bit of hardship to get proper independence. Never know you could love it
mariaalice wrote: » To be honest I think that a weird one as well unless its a short term plan to get sorted, then when the parents die they somehow think its there house and cant believe they have to buy out their siblings. How long does it last, if someone's marriage broke up in their 40s 50s would they still think of going home to their parents. I know circumstances can vary, but it does come across as the person is unable to break the psychological link with their parents as a crutch to fall back on.
SusieBlue wrote: » I'd love it, in fact I'd enjoy it a lot more than living at home. But as someone who is currently single it would add about 4/5 years onto the time it would take me to save for a mortgage. It would also add at least an hour (each way) onto my commute each day. It would reduce my quality of life, make the working day more stressful, I'd be sharing with strangers and it would push my plans to get a mortgage even further away. Orrrrr...I could put the head down and hopefully get a mortgage on my own in 2-3 years. Short term pain for long term gain.
Wildly Boaring wrote: » I take your point. What is the mortgage obsession? You're saying 3 years in parent's house / 7 or 8 whilst renting? I don't see the problem with the 7 or 8 year rent. is it not pretty normal. Say graduate at 22 and own mortgage by 30? House share with mates/whomever and possibly boyfriend/girlfriend before buying at a reasonable age? Living at home with mammy isn't pain to me. I'd see it as imposing on the parents rather than pain to the 20 / 30 year old. As for the longer commute. Get used to it. The generation coming is going to be commuting unless there's 2 of ye with nice jobs.
mariaalice wrote: » I know circumstances can vary, but it does come across as the person is unable to break the psychological link with their parents as a crutch to fall back on.
Braelyn Fat Toe wrote: » Yes I think it's sad that we have such a negative view of adults living with or moving back in with parents. Obviously it wouldn't work in some cases, but in others it means company, and practical and financial assistance for an elderly parent, and a nicer home in a nicer area for their adult son or daughter. What's wrong with that if everyone gets along and the adult child pulls their weight and takes on responsibility for some of the housework and maintenance and the parent treats their adult offspring like a proper grown up?