Outlaw Pete wrote: » Yes. LMAO. You prove yourself wrong and yet act like you're right :pac:
Overheal wrote: » Proof [red barrel video] is fake? Where is the translation for it?
Blueshoe wrote: » Watch the child!! It's clearly alive.What more do you want! The child is moving and opening its eyes. I'm not sure if you are aware but dead people don't move. Ones killed in bombings tend to have a few scratches on them too. Unless it's a miracle.
Overheal wrote: » I want the translation of the video so I can actually know what the woman says in the 2 minute video clip next to the red barrels thanks.
Overheal wrote: » Where is the translation of the video Rice shared please?
Blueshoe wrote: » Susan Rice shared a video of what she says is s dead child and a distraught mother. She blamed Trump But in the video the child is alive as can be confirmed by watching the video. Either she has shared the wrong video or else she is an idiot. That's the story.
Overheal wrote: » Susan rice never said that though.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » You don't need a translation for heaven sake.https://twitter.com/fiber_ghost/status/1183021750050795521 But like I said, even if this was a legit video, it still would have been disgraceful to do what Susan Rice did, but as we saw from her appearance on The View, the president's impeachment is what she's really all about.
Overheal wrote: I could as much allege from that clip that the child is in shock, or just staring blankly up into the blue sky and daydreaming (as children, we often do)(especially when this child has what source of entertainment, or distraction from current events, exactly?)
Overheal wrote: » Nothing odd about any of that: the Trump WH enjoyed numerous, numerous leaks from Congressional Oversight including (public-hearing telegraphing) while the special counsel investigation was proceeding. The WH tampered with witnesses and used leaked information to prepare counter testimony and keep their own lies straight. Having the hearings closed means the panels get to hear each witness version of events - where they match and where they conflict (if they conflict). Republicans and Democrats both sit on those panels. And besides not too long ago Trump defended shrouding phone call logs into the government's code-word level classified database because he was tired of leaks to the press from earlier in his administration. Surely then you should be the first to defend Congress' right to do inherently the same thing?
mcmoustache wrote: » You need to look up the word "Odd".
Outlaw Pete wrote: » But like I said, even if this was a legit video, it still would have been disgraceful to do what Susan Rice did, but as we saw from her appearance on The View, the president's impeachment is what she's really all about.
Overheal wrote: » She was answering a question from one of the stupid hosts who pushed impeachment into Rice's response the Kurdistan and you want to blame her for having a premeditated agenda to link the two on her visit?
Matt Barrett wrote: » You'll not get a legitimate discussion. You're arguing with Alt-Right conspiracy theorists.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » She said Trump had the girl's blood on his hands.
Now, as I said, I think she would have been wrong to have said that even if the child had genuinely been killed in an attack, but the child is clearly not dead and so what "blood" was Susan referring to exactly?
Blueshoe wrote: » We usually meet on Tuesdays and Thursdays but with Ireland playing tonight this evenings meeting is cancelled.
mad muffin wrote: » Why don’t you tell me. You seem to be the authority on grammar
mad muffin wrote: » What were the Fox polls last week? 51 percent for impeachment. Looks like Schiffty Schiff is doing a sterling job at obfuscation. It’s now down to 46 percent. Good job Schiffty. Good job. Keep it up.
hetuzozaho wrote: » Who is claiming that the child in her arms is dead?
Cody montana wrote: » Where are you getting this information from?
mcmoustache wrote: » That's not grammar.
mad muffin wrote: » Fox. Obviously.
Overheal wrote: » To quote Kevin McCarthy - you added a word in there.
But besides, whether she's talking about the Kurd genocide in her tweet as a whole
or this girl from a video she probably barely watched - she doesn't have the ****ing translation for that video any more than I or you do. As I said, if she's referring to this child then she didn't watch the video. Either way I doubt she speaks Kurdish.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » That is flat out false. Whoopie asks Rice about the Syrian withdrawal and what the potential dangers are of it (she did not mention impeachment when she posed the question). Susan then proceeded to give her views on what she thinks withdrawing will lead to with regards to the resurgence of ISIS (which I tend to agree with by the way) and Joy then interjects (at 1m 42s) and asks: ".. and there's no way to stop him from this?" to which Susan then, off her own back, starts talking about impeaching Trump. SHE linked the two, not her hosts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nagk-DcTAIY
