jimgoose wrote: » We're "triggered", apparently, and "enraged" by the sight of a teenage girl. Go figure. I'm only surprised that "gammon", one of the more nonsensical of these Neo-Politik words that have materialised, hasn't cropped up in this context. :pac:
Tell me how wrote: » If you don't want to be identified as 'triggered and enraged' by Greta, stop being 'triggered and enraged' by reports of what she is doing and the message she is communicating. That argument throughout the thread is consistent only in the manner in which it has been poorly presented and the justification for it has rolled from one angle to the next and back again.
jimgoose wrote: » What a lot of rot! :pac:
Tell me how wrote: » And yet another consistent argument.
Tell me how wrote: » The poster is wrong. As are you.
gozunda wrote: » That's taken from the companies blurb. Hilarious you are claiming they are wrong and even more bizarre that you try to claim expertise over and above those who run / own the company...
gozunda wrote: » That's taken from the companies blurb. Hilarious you are claiming they are wrong and even more bizarre that you try to claim expertise over and above those who run / own the company. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
jimgoose wrote: » Somebody should tell Jag, they're only planning on building the new electric XJ saloon in Castle Bromwich.
Tell me how wrote: » The line implied all BMW cars are made in Europe. That is wrong. I get the difficulty in understanding it.
Eric Cartman wrote: » Cutting off chinese manufacturing would have little impact on high earners and ‘the rich’ it would pnly serve to hurt the poor.
KyussB wrote: » The poor in China don't need western trade - what they need is for the Chinese economy to focus on boosting the domestic economy (which is where all of the poor live...), instead of focusing on being a mass-export economy - and reducing trade with China would achieve exactly that.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » How about taxing the hell out of high earners to better distribute money and services amongst the poor, would you be down with that?
gctest50 wrote: Bmw is made in China
gozunda wrote: » ...According to the companies blurb - BMW is headquartered in Munich and in Europe produces motor vehicles in Germany and the UK. And yes BMW and others also produce vehicles for specific markets in other countries - this at least partially due to trade restrictions of importing such vehicles to those counties. China is a case in point
gozunda wrote: » Do you problems understanding what was written? Let me know and I'll help you out the best I can ...
Tell me how wrote: » Dude, you struggled (and failed) with sic.
Eric Cartman wrote: » Absolutely not , they earned that money and your theftist attitude is disgusting
jimgoose wrote: » Not on your nelly.
Naggdefy wrote: Who else has caused such a stir so young?
Thelonious Monk wrote: » But posters here feign concern for the poor not being able to afford things, when talking about putting tax on flights and other carbon heavy industries. You hate the poor! Theftist? No I just want better distribution of wealth and fairer societies. I was lucky to be born into a moderately well off home and given opportunities in life, not everyone gets that but it would be great if they did.
Naggdefy wrote: » When has a 16 year old had such an influence on world political affairs?Greta, agree, disagree, like or loathe is remarkable. Joan of Arc is the last girl of similar age to make such an impression that I can think of. That was probably more 'local', the French/English 100 years war.Who else has caused such a stir so young?
(Joan) "was, it seems, almost entirely the creation of France's desperate need for a patriotic mascot in the 19th century. The country wanted a hero, the myths of the revolution were altogether too bloody, and France more or less invented the story of its patron saint. ...much of the adulation is down to wishful thinking, Mr Caratini claims. "Psychologically, her story is beautiful," he said. "It's the little girl who lives out her dreams to the end. But she really wasn't the heroine who saved France - just a human being with exceptional energy and self-belief." According to Mr Caratini, however, who based his book on what he says is the first scientific study of the records of her trial, her voices were quite clearly "fantasies fabricated by our heroine, presented as if they were real, but with no deliberate intention to deceive. They are frequent and normal in every young child".
gozunda wrote: » There are certain similarities I'd agree. However . as with Joan - much of what greta does / says is certainly hyped and dies not stand up to scrutiny.
As the crisis escalate in our natural world, we refuse to turn away from the climate catastrophe and species extinction. For The Guardian, reporting on the environment is a priority. We give reporting on climate, nature and pollution the prominence it deserves, stories which often go unreported by others in the media. At this pivotal time for our species and our planet, we are determined to inform readers about threats, consequences and solutions based on scientific facts, not political prejudice or business interests.
Tell me how wrote: » I thought you didn't like quotes from newspapers?And from the Guardian no less. I take it you will accept their position on the climate discussion.No evidence amongst their pages of them questioning the motives or behaviour of Greta either.
The cult of youth damages everyone... We’ve begun to behave as if young people are special; more virtuous and wiser than adults. It’s wrong and it’s creepy and we’ve got to stop it
gozunda wrote: » Lol. Re. policing the internet - even more relevant because that one source can damn one and praise the other and see no contradiction... Certainly as with Sainte Joan - much of what they report on - would indeed appear to be based on fiction fiction Perhaps your like this instead? Again the creation of a 'saint' - this time saint greta ..https://www.spectator.co.uk/2019/10/the-cult-of-youth-damages-everyone/
Why do we keep pretending that children are wiser than adults?
Tell me how wrote: » I have no comment to make on their reporting of Joan of Arc. I have no great knowledge or interest of her and like lots of stories without recorded evidence, the story and reality are likely somewhat disconnected from each other. Spectator? Please...Also, the byline from that piece.Nobody is pretending that. Wakefield is doing the old strawman thing.
gozunda wrote: » Simply replying to the other poster who introduced Joan of Arc. Ok with you? Ah I see you like the Grudgion and its gushing editorials on saints greta but not the Spectator. Grand so
Tell me how wrote: » You used the 'Grudgion' (sic) to support your argument. Which is it, you believe their articles or not?When I use the spectator to support mine, you can ask me the same question.