VonLuck wrote: » This may seem like a basic question, but would appreciate some guidance. Hypothetical scenario. If I have a €200k mortgage, say 5 year fixed at 2.65%, repayments €805 approx. I've estimated the interest payments would be maybe around €450 to start and decreasing as the years go on. Bank states that 10% overpayment of the mortgage balance is permitted. Let's say that I increase the repayments to €1000 (which would be less than 10% of the mortgage balance over 5 years). Does this have any effect on the interest paid initially seeing as you are reducing the capital to be paid off by an additional €195 every month? I hope I'm making sense. Just trying to figure out if it's best to overpay a mortgage earlier and reduce interest payments at the initial stages or else invest the money I would have used for overpaying into something else. If it is the case that interest payments would reduce, how would I calculate what they would be?
Klonker wrote: » Usually when the banks say you can overpay by 10%, they mean of your monthly mortgage payment. So in your example you could overpay by €80.50 (805.00 * 10%). I'd double check that if I was you.
jayjay2010 wrote: » When I make overpayments, I always ask for the term to be reduced. I want to pay my mortgage off early. However you will have the option to instead reduce the monthly installment amount, which doesn't save you as much interest in the long run.
jayjay2010 wrote: » OP all the banks have their own rules when it comes to overpaying, however I found that you have to be very careful when you overpay and make sure that it is clear where your money is going. I've had issues with PTSB and my friend with BOI. When you call the banks, the call agents are usually not sure of the overpayment rules either. I had to speak to 4 different agents on 4 different occasions to get the correct information. The interest savings can be huge when you overpay. Even an extra €50/€100 per month can be very significant in the long run.When I make overpayments, I always ask for the term to be reduced. I want to pay my mortgage off early. However you will have the option to instead reduce the monthly installment amount, which doesn't save you as much interest in the long run. The overpay vs invest debate is one to consider. My strategy is to do both: make some overpayments and invest some. That way I can benefit from both options.
awec wrote: » This is not true. The saving is exactly the same, but reducing the mandatory payment vs reducing the term is much safer. I cannot think of a single advantage to reducing the term when overpaying a mortgage.
Hassan Calm Teamster wrote: » Far as I can tell overpaying the mortgage (by increasing your monthly repayment) reduces the term automatically (as the loan is fully cleared earlier). Unless of course you're making a lump sum overpayment (I don't think the OP is doing this though) in which case you would probably have a choice of the lump sum payment being made and the repayment remaining at its current level to reduce the term or a reduction in monthly payments for the remainder of the agreed term. If you are already used to paying a certain amount each month then I can definitely see the benefit of being mortgage free a few years earlier, shortening the term will amount to interest savings.
awec wrote: » Yes, but the poster in question is talking about getting the bank to officially shorten the term. That means there is no way to go back to the original payments without the bank approving. You are essentially telling the bank to take away all of that buffer you gained by overpaying, and you're getting nothing in return for it. Best way to do it is to overpay and reduce the payment, and then keep paying whatever you can afford. If your payment is 800 a month and you make a lump sum payment and it reduces your monthly to 600, keep paying 800. You'll save the exact same amount of interest, you'll finish the mortgage early, but you can always drop your monthly payment to 600 if something bad happens and you need that extra cash. If you tell the bank to shorten the term you can't do this.
Sparkey84 wrote: » if the bank officially raises the monthly amount there is the risk of comiting to that obligation. however you absolutely do get something for it. a far shorter term. the other thing if the worst was to happen and you needed to renegotiated back down in payments you would have a very strong case as you would be up value to loan ratio
6 wrote: » Its 10% of the balance.
awec wrote: » You don’t get a shorter term. It’s the exact same term you’d have by reducing monthly payments and continuing to overpay. Example (with made up numbers) Current payment is 1000 a month. There is like 200000 left on the mortgage, so 200 months to go. You get 100k lump sum and pay it, new balance is 100000. You tell the bank to reduce payments. You continue to pay 1000 a month, but now you’re overpaying and you pay it off in 100 months. Or you tell the bank to reduce the term, and you pay it off in 100 months. In both cases, interest paid is the same. In both cases the mortgage term is the same. The only difference is the second scenario is a one way ticket.
Hassan Calm Teamster wrote: » It's restricted to 10% of the monthly repayment with my bank, is it 10% of the balance for lump sum overpayments or do other banks allow more than 10% for monthly top ups?
pwurple wrote: » Some basic misconceptions in here.Overpaying to reduce the term has a very different effect to just reducing the repayment. (As the other poster said, do your compound interest sums). You pay the interest up front my friends. The above is why the banks default option is to reduce the repayment, not the term automatically. It makes them more money that way. Whoever said they assume the bank reduces the term? I’m afraid not. At 2.65% rate, there are very few savings accounts with that return on investment. Speaking to a financial advisor will inevitably end up with them trying to sell you a financial ‘product’ of some kind, usually a stock market investment pack, or a private pension as they earn commission on these. Not that that’s a bad thing, we all should have pensions if possible, just be aware of it. Oh, and accountants are not the people to advise you on mortgages or risk funds. Accountants are for calculating tax liability. No training in lending. Understand You’re getting a personal rather than a professional opinion there.
cruizer101 wrote: » Just with regards to how much you can overpay Ulster Bank are 10% of remaining fixed balance. KBC are 10% of remaining balance. BOI are 10% of monthly payments. The others I'm not sure, EBS and PTSB I think you can't actually overpay but the money is held in credit against the mortgage so you don't accrue interest on that amount ( don't take my word on this ). The other thing that not many people realise is you can split a mortgage between fixed and variable, this will allow you to overpay with no conditions on the variable part of the mortgage. e.g. you have mortgage of 300k you could split that 250k fixed, 50k variable and then you can overpay as much as you want on the 50k bit. Ideally if doing this (assuming fixed is better rate) you split such that with your planned overpayments you just pay of the variable portion and the end of your fixed term. You can then fix again and split of a certain amount as variable.
cruizer101 wrote: » The others I'm not sure, EBS and PTSB I think you can't actually overpay but the money is held in credit against the mortgage so you don't accrue interest on that amount ( don't take my word on this ).
awec wrote: » I think you're talking as if you reduce the monthly payment, and then don't overpay, right? Which is not what anyone is suggesting. If you reduce the payment, then continue to pay the same rate as before (i.e. the exact same amount you'd pay if you reduce the term instead) the outcome is the same. The difference is you are overpaying using this method, which gives you flexibility to reduce your monthly payments in future if you have to.