nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

President Donald Trump - Formal Impeachment Inquiry Announced

Veritas Libertas

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announces a formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump over the whistleblower complaint on Trump's communication with Ukraine about Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden. /CNN

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

mcmoustache

But Trump asked a foreign government for electoral assistance which is a bit no no. It's in the transcript that he released and everything. Then he did it out in public. And now two people working for his lawyer got arrested and charged with shenanigans.

He left the Dems with little choice.

johnmc76

notobtuse wrote: »

Without a full House floor vote on the impeachment inquiry it gives Trump convincing justification for not cooperating with the inquiry as it now stands. But he would have no excuse to ignore the inquiry if there were a vote. So why not take a vote? Without it the whole inquiry is little more than political theater on the part of Democrats.

Because he knows they're full of ****. And these inquiries are wastes of time. Most of these Democrats are more interested in playing to the cameras ["I Am Spartacus" anyone? ] and giving the illusion to their base that they're doing something.

If they found anything impeaching him for then they would have had the vote by now. They don't and they're worried that a roll call vote would endanger their members in districts that Trump won and possibly will win again next year.

I like that Trump is calling them on this. "Have your vote or shut the **** up about it." Instead they're content to drag this into his second term.

Beasty

mad muffin wrote: »

Fake?

Ah now… I knew you were the Chief-In-Disingenuousness

But that statement that the video is fake just takes the biscuit.

You better not dare call out anyone posting in bad faith after that post. That video is a live news feed. And you have the audacity to call it fake. I suppose you would. Being as you are Chief-in-Bad fait posting.

I’ll go one step further and say you are a disgrace. You are a mod ffs. I expect a slightly higher standard. But reading other Mods on this site. I’m not surprised. Not in the slightest.

Attack the post, not the poster

notobtuse

Cody montana wrote: »

These Trump defenders are total hypocrites.

If I was the whistle blower I wouldn't want my name made public.
The trump nuts/the president would try to murder you.

It's like an extreme religion, this is how they behave.
Trump is their god and must not be questioned.

Anyway, many more whistle blowers are coming forward now.

Ahmen!

Overheal

Leaked RNC talking points memo

EGnVi4BX4AAnr-B?format=png&name=900x900

chimes with Lindsey Graham earlier:

"The Trump Administration and House Republicans should say HELL NO to this idea!

What was unseemly in the House of Representatives is becoming a charade. Allowing the whistleblower to testify in writing would violate every principle of due process and show what a sham the House impeachment process has become."

Mardy Bum

Cody montana wrote: »

Overheal wrote: »

Many folks online have already called for violence against the whistleblower.

It's like an extreme religion, this is how they behave.
Trump is their god and must not be questioned.

Anyway, many more whistle blowers are coming forward now.

It is called fascism.

Cody montana

Overheal wrote: »

Many folks online have already called for violence against the whistleblower.

It's like an extreme religion, this is how they behave.
Trump is their god and must not be questioned.

Anyway, many more whistle blowers are coming forward now.

Overheal

Cody montana wrote: »

These Trump defenders are total hypocrites.

If I was the whistle blower I wouldn't want my name made public.
The trump nuts/the president would try to murder you.

Many folks online have already called for violence against the whistleblower.

Outlaw Pete

Yovanovitch's opening statement in full:

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/1888-yovanovitch-opening-statement/48cf6b834149b4867fb5/optimized/full.pdf

Cody montana

Overheal wrote: »

Lindsey Graham blasting the whistleblower for wanting to testify in writing: says it "would violate every principle of due process"

Forgot that Trump testified in writing to Mueller.

These Trump defenders are total hypocrites.

If I was the whistle blower I wouldn't want my name made public.
The trump nuts/the president would try to murder you.

Overheal

Lindsey Graham blasting the whistleblower for wanting to testify in writing: says it "would violate every principle of due process"

Forgot that Trump testified in writing to Mueller.

Overheal

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Same with all footage that goes against the laughable 'Antifa are anti-fascist heroes' narrative. They'll spend days arguing about anyone can buy a mask and black clothes and pretend to be Antifa.

Can they not?

Overheal

Zubeneschamali wrote: »

Zelenskyy in that transcript clearly knows he's talking to the king, the pope of narcissists, and he is grovelling and flattering as hard as he can.

As every foreign diplomat has done. Remember when Trump kept trying to quid pro quo Shinzo Abe to nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize?

Zubeneschamali

mcmoustache wrote: »

Would you expect him to say "She was great and you're an ass for removing her. Now, about those funds..."?

Zelenskyy in that transcript clearly knows he's talking to the king, the pope of narcissists, and he is grovelling and flattering as hard as he can.

Overheal

notobtuse wrote: »

Without a full House floor vote on the impeachment inquiry it gives Trump convincing justification for not cooperating with the inquiry as it now stands. But he would have no excuse to ignore the inquiry if there were a vote. So why not take a vote? Without it the whole inquiry is little more than political theater on the part of Democrats.

It’s not a justification for not cooperating. There is no compulsion to take a floor vote for the inquiry process. Trump certainly hasn’t agreed to unsealing redacted Grand Jury information. Just more daylight evidence of obstruction.

notobtuse

Without a full House floor vote on the impeachment inquiry it gives Trump convincing justification for not cooperating with the inquiry as it now stands. But he would have no excuse to ignore the inquiry if there were a vote. So why not take a vote? Without it the whole inquiry is little more than political theater on the part of Democrats.

Outlaw Pete

mad muffin wrote: »

Fake?

Same with all footage that goes against the laughable 'Antifa are anti-fascist heroes' narrative. They'll spend days arguing about anyone can buy a mask and black clothes and pretend to be Antifa. Best ignored at this stage.

mad muffin wrote: »

By the way. Zelensky was happy that Yovanovitch was recalled. As he told Trump on the call.

Zelensky said he agreed with Trump "100 per cent" that the former US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, was "a bad ambassador.

If ever there was an axe grinder, it's her. She'll give them something to play with today for sure.

Lutsenko claims she said some inappropriate stuff to him regarding who he should (and more importantly) should not be investigating.

Rumours about she spied on John Solomon and some other journalists too.

Wonder if they'll ask her about that today.

Overheal

mcmoustache wrote: »

Would you expect him to say "She was great and you're an ass for removing her. Now, about those funds..."?

mcmoustache

mad muffin wrote: »

By the way. Zelensky was happy that Yovanovitch was recalled. As he told Trump on the call.

Zelensky said he agreed with Trump "100 per cent" that the former US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, was "a bad ambassador.

Would you expect him to say "She was great and you're an ass for removing her. Now, about those funds..."?

Overheal

mad muffin wrote: »

By the way. Zelensky was happy that Yovanovitch was recalled. As he told Trump on the call.

Zelensky said he agreed with Trump "100 per cent" that the former US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, was "a bad ambassador.

Can't say I take any significance in that statement? Doesn't alleviate the fact that Giuliani/Trump conspired with the ex soviets who wanted her removed.

mad muffin

By the way. Zelensky was happy that Yovanovitch was recalled. As he told Trump on the call.

Zelensky said he agreed with Trump "100 per cent" that the former US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, was "a bad ambassador.

“It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%,” Zelensky said. “Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous president and she was on his side. She would not accept me as a new president well enough.”

Overheal

mad muffin wrote: »

Fake?

Ah now… I knew you were the Chief-In-Disingenuousness

But that statement that the video is fake just takes the biscuit.

You better not dare call out anyone posting in bad faith after that post. That video is a live news feed. And you have the audacity to call it fake. I suppose you would. Being as you are Chief-in-Bad fait posting.

I’ll go one step further and say you are a disgrace. You are a mod ffs. I expect a slightly higher standard. But reading other Mods on this site. I’m not surprised. Not in the slightest.

You have done nothing but post in bad faith. The video is 'fake news', having nothing to do with impeachment, and having no veracity that the people in the video were indeed 'far left.' Rapidly pushed by the Daily Tucker Carlson

Also not a mod except in the forums I mod, of course.

mad muffin

Overheal wrote: »

Your megathread dump for all these fake videos is the Antifa thread I thought

Fake?

Ah now… I knew you were the Chief-In-Disingenuousness

But that statement that the video is fake just takes the biscuit.

You better not dare call out anyone posting in bad faith after that post. That video is a live news feed. And you have the audacity to call it fake. I suppose you would. Being as you are Chief-in-Bad fait posting.

I’ll go one step further and say you are a disgrace. You are a mod ffs. I expect a slightly higher standard. But reading other Mods on this site. I’m not surprised. Not in the slightest.

Overheal

notobtuse wrote: »

Trouble in comprehension? I was referring to the impeachment inquiry process... but good attempt at moving the goalposts.

Don’t need a vote on that though

notobtuse

Igotadose wrote: »

They all do get to vote to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate. Any ideas how many GOP will vote for them?

Trouble in comprehension? I was referring to the impeachment inquiry process... but good attempt at moving the goalposts.

hetuzozaho

Billy Mays wrote: »

I'd say your twitter feed is fascinating

Timeline must be good too!

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

You know nothing about Twitter to say that it takes a lot to get banned there. I've been posting on there for years and had multiple accounts temp suspended

Overheal

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Says the chap who keeps posting "BREAKING NEWS" and then linking to nonsense clickbait articles on Mediaite that have little or no substance.

still more substance than anything you post

Yeah, people should be more careful about who they associate with.

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1182329950847881217

Did Obama orchestrate him any favors like Trump did for the ex soviet goons? Which US ambassador did Obama recall to appease this donor? What scheme were they in? Was this man seen palling around with the DNC co chair and the President’s son while he ran Obama’s business? Was he also a client to Obama’s personal lawyer? Was he fleeing the country at the time of his indictment? Did Obama’s attorney arrange to fly over and scheme with him overseas?

Billy Mays

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

These violent far leftists are out of control.

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1182515583599951872

I'd say your twitter feed is fascinating

Igotadose

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

Yeah, people should be more careful about who they associate with.

So, you support prosecution for campaign finance violation. Good to know.

Outlaw Pete

Overheal wrote: »

Your megathread dump for all these fake videos is the Antifa thread I thought

Says the chap who keeps posting "BREAKING NEWS" and then linking to nonsense clickbait articles on Mediaite that have little or no substance.

Matt Barrett wrote: »

This is your team at work comrades

Yeah, people should be more careful about who they associate with.

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1182329950847881217