1800_Ladladlad wrote: » This is how I envision all of the orange man bad posters on this thread.https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1182478053043257344
Cody montana wrote: » Looks like a slow dance flash mob. Great fun. ðŸ‘
Cody montana wrote: » Everyone will be burning them in the future.
mcmoustache wrote: » Look at Overheal's post again and don't forget to check the link before you click on it.
Woodsie1 wrote: » Looks like a bunch of deranged morons:pac:
notobtuse wrote: » I understand the whistleblower’s lawyers have asked Congress for their client to submit testimony in writing instead of giving his testimony in person. I don’t believe there is any precedent for this type of thing, so it should be denied.
Two Giuliani Associates Who Helped Him on Ukraine Charged With Campaign-Finance Violations The two men were charged with four counts, including conspiracy, falsification of records and lying to the Federal Election Commission about their political donations, which included a $325,000 donation through a limited liability company to a super PAC formed to support Mr. Trump, according to the indictment. Geoffrey Berman, the U.S. attorney in Manhattan, said Thursday the investigation was continuing. Messrs. Parnas and Fruman, both Florida businessmen who are U.S. citizens born in former Soviet republics, made a brief appearance in federal court in Virginia Thursday, dressed in T-shirts. They were arrested at Dulles International Airport on Wednesday while awaiting an international flight with one-way tickets, according to people familiar with the matter.https://www.wsj.com/articles/two-foreign-born-men-who-helped-giuliani-on-ukraine-arrested-on-campaign-finance-charges-11570714188
Outlaw Pete wrote: » These violent far leftists are out of control.https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1182515583599951872
notobtuse wrote: » And I'm confident his identity will come out at some point by the Democrats. That way he can become the darling of the Democrats and the Left, appear at political rallies, rake in millions in donations because he is being so persecuted and fearful, go on the talk show and liberal news circuits, and write a couple of books.
notobtuse wrote: » I understand the whistleblower’s lawyers have asked Congress for their client to submit testimony in writing instead of giving his testimony in person. I don’t believe there is any precedent for this type of thing, so it should be denied. But Shiff will probably grant the request. That way Shiff can ask the questions and his staff can help steer the written answers. If the whistleblower felt so strongly that what Trump did was so bad then have the courage to testify, keeping your identity withheld. His identity should be kept confidential but those that fed him the false information shouldn’t be shielded. Maybe the Senate should also start an investigation so Republicans can ask some questions, too. And I'm confident his identity will come out at some point by the Democrats. That way he can become the darling of the Democrats and the Left, appear at political rallies, rake in millions in donations because he is being so persecuted and fearful, go on the talk show and liberal news circuits, and write a couple of books.
Matt Barrett wrote: » So attacking the whistle blower again? All you're doing is looking desperate. Why do you dislike the way America works? Maybe you should go back to where you came from? You seem like you hate America.
notobtuse wrote: » Why won’t Pelosi hold a House floor vote to officially open an impeachment inquiry for this preposterous and manufactured supposed crisis? Oh, wait, I may have indirectly answered my own question... but I digress. As I recall a floor vote was held for the Clinton impeachment inquiry, and a floor vote was held for the Nixon impeachment inquiry. But no vote for Trump? Why? I can guess the real reasons why Pelosi is abusing her power… Because it would endanger Democrats in hotly contested districts having to vote for an impeachment inquiry based pretty much on nothing more than partisan grounds. Because if she held the vote she would be compelled to provide Republicans the right to also subpoena and have access to all the witnesses. And the biggest 'because' in all is she can't allow the American people see the disingenuous claims that the inquiry is based upon. Trump was right in his letter that inquiry, as it now stands, is partisan and illegitimate. I understand CONGRESS (in this case the HOUSE) can start an impeachment inquiry for anything their little minds come up with, but the HOUSE is not one person with Pelosi being lord and master... The HOUSE is comprised of 435, or so, members.
notobtuse wrote: » I understand CONGRESS (in this case the HOUSE) can start an impeachment inquiry for anything their little minds come up with, but the HOUSE is not one person with Pelosi being lord and master... The HOUSE is comprised of 435, or so, members.
Overheal wrote: » Your megathread dump for all these fake videos is the Antifa thread I thought
Matt Barrett wrote: » This is your team at work comrades
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Yeah, people should be more careful about who they associate with.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Says the chap who keeps posting "BREAKING NEWS" and then linking to nonsense clickbait articles on Mediaite that have little or no substance.
Yeah, people should be more careful about who they associate with.https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1182329950847881217
Billy Mays wrote: » I'd say your twitter feed is fascinating
Outlaw Pete wrote: » You know nothing about Twitter to say that it takes a lot to get banned there. I've been posting on there for years and had multiple accounts temp suspended
Igotadose wrote: » They all do get to vote to send the articles of impeachment to the Senate. Any ideas how many GOP will vote for them?
notobtuse wrote: » Trouble in comprehension? I was referring to the impeachment inquiry process... but good attempt at moving the goalposts.
mad muffin wrote: » Fake? Ah now… I knew you were the Chief-In-Disingenuousness But that statement that the video is fake just takes the biscuit. You better not dare call out anyone posting in bad faith after that post. That video is a live news feed. And you have the audacity to call it fake. I suppose you would. Being as you are Chief-in-Bad fait posting. I’ll go one step further and say you are a disgrace. You are a mod ffs. I expect a slightly higher standard. But reading other Mods on this site. I’m not surprised. Not in the slightest.
“It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%,” Zelensky said. “Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous president and she was on his side. She would not accept me as a new president well enough.”
mad muffin wrote: » By the way. Zelensky was happy that Yovanovitch was recalled. As he told Trump on the call. Zelensky said he agreed with Trump "100 per cent" that the former US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, was "a bad ambassador.
mcmoustache wrote: » Would you expect him to say "She was great and you're an ass for removing her. Now, about those funds..."?
