nozzferrahhtoo wrote: » Three issues there. The first is that I am not convinced at all it has become more of an issue. I am not sure what stats you are drawing from here. Rather we seem to have merely become more aware of it, are more open about it, diagnose it better and are more inclined to talk about it.Secondly even if it was more of an issue, the link to faith is a correlation/causation assumption that I do not think is warranted. There are any number of reasons and influences for why mental health might be more of an issue, if we were to assume it is actually more of an issue. I see no reason to link it to a drop in faith at all. Thirdly I am not even sure how safe the claim is that the majority have lost faith. I genuinely do not know the current statistics or which ones you are using here. The last ones I saw were.... odd.... and hard to parse. But they did not suggest the majority had lost faith. And even those who have moved away from a particular church or other, still seem to profess a faith. Whatever the solution to mental health issues are though, I am not sure lying to oneself is the right medicine to advocate to deal with it.
Deleted User wrote: » There are mental health advantages in believing in God, because making room in one’s mind for the existence of an invisible unconditionally loving being in whom we can trust gives us a certain feeling of security and hope in that no matter what goes wrong in life there is every possibility of future contentment. Mental health has become more of an issue now that the majority have no faith. I always remember one the the last things my mother said, aged 89, not long before she died, “please do not take my faith away, I could lose it if persuaded. Please try and have some faith, try not to be dissuaded by tbe currency of disbelief, yourself because even if you are in the depths of despair you can always pray”.
railer201 wrote: » Some time back on boards I recounted a story where a deceased pilot had appeared to another alive pilot outside Glasgow Airport where they had engaged in a short conversation before passing on their 'respective ways'.
Zubeneschamali wrote: » Oh, well in that case, clearly my whole materialist worldview has been refuted, since you heard a ghost story.
igCorcaigh wrote: » I'm more with Einstein than Gödel with this one.
Ipso wrote: » I'd say a lot of people lost trust in man made institutions than lost faith completely.
railer201 wrote: » In the modern reductionist world we live in anything that can't be backed up by hard science is scoffed at, therefore God doesn't exist because it can't be proved scientifically he does.
railer201 wrote: » it does contradict the reductionist point of view and points up that we are spirits as well as bodies with brains.
donkeykong5 wrote: » Why do people who dont believe in God keep on about it 24/7.
donkeykong5 wrote: » Just let it go and move on.
donkeykong5 wrote: » Why do people who dont believe in God keep on about it 24/7. Just let it go and move on. I'm glad I believe in God. I enjoy mass every Saturday night in whitefriar street which is usually packed. So theres no need to keep on about it. There are still plenty of happy Catholics in Ireland. Move on . You really wont be missed. Life is for living!. Enjoy
nozzferrahhtoo wrote: » Except such a story does not such thing. I could recount a story of someone who was abducted by aliens. That does not mean there are aliens. I can recount a story of someone who is convinced they remember a past life. That does not mean reincarnation exists. I can recount a story of someone who talked to tiny little people. That does not mean there are fairies. People see weird stuff, or see normal stuff and parse it weirdly, all the time. In isolation such anecdote is not evidence of anything except the fallibility of human perception. Even if we automatically assume the anecdote is true and truthful.
Mad_maxx wrote: » God ( of the Bible, torah, Koran) is the biggest mass murderer in history
nozzferrahhtoo wrote: » donkeykong5 wrote: » Why do people who dont believe in God keep on about it 24/7. Few of them do. Rather when a thread on the actual topic comes up, we happily partake in it. Much different really. Your post is a bit like walking specifically into a bar and saying "Why are people drinking all the time" or specifically into a thread about the US presidency and saying "Why are people going on about Trump all the time". So the "let it go and move on" mantra would be better applied to yourself. As by entering a thread specifically on the topic to moan that people are discussing the topic..... it is really only you manufacturing an issue out of it. That said however in my real life...... donkeykong5 wrote: » Just let it go and move on. ...... I would happily never discuss god or religion ever again or have anything to do with it. Alas I am simply not let! In all the subjects I AM invested and active in.... science, education, sexuality, womens rights, human rights, childrens rights, reproductive rights, politics and much more..... the parties of god are only too keen to shove their faith in my face and in the discourse in our halls of education, power and science. And as long as that keeps occurring, I will have to keep dealing with religion and the claims about gods. It is not atheists either.... since you are imagining people going on 24/7 who actually don't........ going door to door to Interrupt your day with their "good news" or standing on street corners with megaphones throwing out threats against your well being to repent or burn. The most atheists have is an information table once a week with no megaphones. So. Move on. You really wont be missed. Life is for living! Enjoy.
daveorourke77 wrote: » Not true. Some of the followers of the gods you mention have committed mass murder in the name of their gods. Therefore, it's the followers (i.e humans) that are the greatest mass murderers in history.
donkeykong5 wrote: » The title of the thread is " do you believe in God ". My answer and millions of others is YES. !
railer201 wrote: » You have to be careful of confirmation bias though, which applies equally to atheists and believers.
railer201 wrote: » 'Apparitions and Haunted Houses' by Sir Ernest Bennett - A survey of evidence.
nozzferrahhtoo wrote: » Which is absolutely fine. That was not what you wrote in the previous post which I replied to though, now was it? Not really equal. Taking an anecdote and saying it shows X is much more subject to confirmation bias as taking the anecdote and saying it could show anything, but there is no evidence it specifically shows X. You would do well not to assume I have not read it and many books similar. I have long read books on NDE, haunting, reincarnation, psychics, spirits, the supernatural, the paranormal and more. I have yet to find any evidence in such books that any of it is anything more than human experience. And quite often the anecdotes surveyed in such books are just that, anecdotes, without any supporting evidence or fact. Worse when any kind of controls are put into place to deal with such evidence, the evidence disappears. For example with OBE a scientist called Sam Parnia put some pretty good controls into place to try and find evidence people actually were leaving their body. As yet this scientist.... one heavily biased towards believing there is an after life.... has failed to find any that I have heard of.
