notobtuse wrote: » Well you certainly won't find any reporting on it from the Democrat's media handmaidens. John Solomon, investigative reporter, who won a number of prestigious awards for his investigative journalism.
Cody montana wrote: » From wiki. "John F. Solomon is an American journalist who is an investigative reporter, a media executive, and a conservative political commentator. He is an editorialist and executive vice president of digital video for The Hill. He was formerly employed as an executive and as editor-in-chief at The Washington Times. While he has won a number of prestigious awards for his investigative journalism, he has also been accused of magnifying small scandals and creating fake controversy." Why did you cut out the second part of the sentence? Copy and past job also!
notobtuse wrote: » Wiki… well okay, then. :rolleyes: Regardless, “magnifying small scandals” does not make them false or incorrect, right?
notobtuse wrote: » Fancy that… apparently Ukraine reopened the Burisma probe months before the Trump-Zelensky phone call, and that the Trump administration was already aware of it. Reportedly the probe into Burisma also involved "unusual transactions" in the natural gas giant's accounts and alleged "illicit funds" coincided in part with the time Hunter Biden held a place on the firm's board... and that investigators in Ukraine filed a 15-page "notice of suspicion" indicating they were "looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden's firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company." And apparently, according to Joe Biden’s spokesperson, Hunter Biden’s position on the board of Burisma was approved by Barack Obama in 2014. So Joe is now dragging Barack into this mess. I bet Obama appreciates it. I guess there can be no quid pro quo if Ukraine had already started an investigation and Trump already knew about it, right? This situation is looking mighty bad for Joe Biden and the Democrat members of Congress rush to impeach.
Cody montana wrote: » Are you copying and pasting statements as your own?https://bongino.com/bombshell-document-reveals-ukraine-started-biden-probe-months-before-trumps-call/ Solomon said the timeline of the alleged “illicit funds” coincided in part with the time Hunter Biden held a place on the firm’s board. The younger Biden was reportedly paid as much as $1 million per year for his time on the board, but Solomon said investigators in Ukraine filed a 15-page “notice of suspicion” indicating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”
Cody montana wrote: » This is what you posted John Solomon, investigative reporter, who won a number of prestigious awards for his investigative journalism. This is from his wiki page. While he has won a number of prestigious awards for his investigative journalism Why did you cut out the second part of the sentence from your copy and paste? "Creating fake controversy" makes them very false I'd say.
notobtuse wrote: » Cody montana wrote: » Are you copying and pasting statements as your own?https://bongino.com/bombshell-document-reveals-ukraine-started-biden-probe-months-before-trumps-call/ Solomon said the timeline of the alleged “illicit funds” coincided in part with the time Hunter Biden held a place on the firm’s board. The younger Biden was reportedly paid as much as $1 million per year for his time on the board, but Solomon said investigators in Ukraine filed a 15-page “notice of suspicion” indicating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.” Didn't read it there.
The Phantom Jipper wrote: » You've been stung rapid, mate.
notobtuse wrote: » My comment was changed a bit from where I got the information, which was not from Bongino.
Overheal wrote: » Whistleblower one’s lawyer clarified reports of bias clarifying the client has never worked for or advised any political candidate, campaign, or political party.https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/ukraine-whistleblowers-lawyers-respond-to-allegations-of-political-bias/
Overheal wrote: » Notobtuse will be laying low for a day or two after that display
Matt Barrett wrote: » Trump and Notobtuse will be pleased. Unbiased reporting and the facts will redeem him no doubt. Unless he's caught by the balls of course. Use to be a time were anyone could make a claim. The claim would be investigated, including the one making the claim. In Trumpland it's you make a claim and the President attacks you on Twitter before any investigation.
notobtuse wrote: » Matt Barrett wrote: » Trump and Notobtuse will be pleased. Unbiased reporting and the facts will redeem him no doubt. Unless he's caught by the balls of course. Use to be a time were anyone could make a claim. The claim would be investigated, including the one making the claim. In Trumpland it's you make a claim and the President attacks you on Twitter before any investigation. I didn't take much stock in the working with a political candidate, campaign, or political party thing. If he worked in the CIA he probably had professional dealings with people from both sides of the political aisle. It would be interesting to see if he was politically motivated or had political bias, though. Social media, texts and emails would help to indicate if he had motives to do what he did without any first hand knowledge. Hopefully Republicans will be allowed to ask questions, also, but I doubt Democrats will allow due process.
Overheal wrote: » AG Barr met with Rupert Murdoch at his home last night (because....?)https://www.mediaite.com/trump/attorney-general-barr-and-rupert-murdoch-reportedly-had-private-meeting-at-murdochs-home-as-trump-attacks-fox/
The Phantom Jipper wrote: » Can you give the link to the article you got this from? I wouldn't mind reading the whole thing for a bit of context.
mcmoustache wrote: » Probably summoned to be told, "You're ****ed. You're all ****ed. We're starting to look stupid but this Romney guy, he might have a future. We have an opening for a Legal Correspondent.".
notobtuse wrote: » Perhaps Barr met with Mueller because Mueller lied about several things.
notobtuse wrote: » Another thought... If the Republicans take back the House, can they start an impeachment inquiry into Pelosi, Shiff and Nadler?
