joe40 wrote: » An independent Scotland that is part of the EU would require strict border controls between themselves and England. Surely that would be a major hindrance for them, and cause problems with trade.
Podge_irl wrote: » Drat. That will learn me I suppose. It is a unique situation in that it would be the first territory to secede from a member state who wanted to stay in the EU I guess then.
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » Algeria 1962 , Greenland 1985 Both special cases. As a result of some unpleasantness a million people left Algeria to go to France. Greenland's an exporter of fish and raw materials.
Fr Tod Umptious wrote: » Well newsflash, the products shipped by dot DE probably transit through dot UK.
Tell me how wrote: » Exactly, this is changing the narrative for what constitutes normal going forward. I would bet that more than a few masters of the dark arts are licking their lips at the prospect of misinformation in future elections or policy discussions. It shouldn't be like this, if you look at the 'Lead by Donkey's' campaign, they have bought up prominent Bill Board space displaying the words of key individuals before the referendum and how they have changed since. This should be leading to flat out demands from show hosts, journalists and the public demanding that these people acknowledge how wrong they were but there's barely a ripple outside from the normal voices which are no longer attracting any new listeners. Perfect storm of nationalism, austerity, social media and the concept of Fake News has only made it easier for manipulators to take the wheel going forward.I hope we in Ireland manage to avoid it but wouldn't bet against it.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/varadkar-and-johnsons-meeting-to-be-kept-secret-as-barnier-warns-still-no-basis-for-a-brexit-deal-38578895.html Are we not even going to get written statements?
WomanSkirtFan8 wrote: » It woud be hillarious if it wasn't so bloody serious.:rolleyes:
J Mysterio wrote: » Uhhhhhhttps://twitter.com/itvpeston/status/1182020313929805824
Taoiseach Leo Varadkar and Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s meeting tomorrow in England is being kept secret at the behest of Downing Street it has emerged. The Taoiseach’s spokesman tonight said the Prime Minister’s office has asked that details of the meeting - 21 days out from the Brexit deadline - should be kept from the public.The Taoiseach’s Office has refused to give any information on where the meeting with Mr Johnson will take place despite significant public interest. A statement issued by the Government Information Services said the two leaders at the centre of Brexit negotiations will meet tomorrow in the "North West of England".
prawnsambo wrote: » The UK pay about £9-10 billion a year to Ni in the form of subventions, decentralised administrative functions and other grants. You'd need to look at McWilliams' article for the actual breakdown, but he contends that almost half of that would be unnecessary in a UI situation.
The economy of Northern Ireland, in terms of GDP per capita, is further behind the Republic today than was the case between East Germany and West Germany in 1989. Bridging the two Irish economies in a newly unified state might take decades, as was and continues to be the case in Germany. But there are few Germans today that argue that unification wasn’t worth the expense.
briany wrote: » Brexit is an English idea. It's all about English nationalism. When you think of your most prominent Brexiteers, you think of a bunch of English people. You think of Nigel Farage, you think of Jacob Rees Mogg, you think of Mark Francois, you think of David Davis and you think of Julia Hartley Brewer, to name a few.
Water John wrote: » Diane Dodds MEP urging the Dairy Industry to pressure, Dublin and London to 'work for a sensible deal'https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/dodds-dairy-industry-should-pressure-eu-to-strike-a-deal/ .
If the EU and Irish Government will not respond on a reciprocal basis then there needs to be equivalent tariffs on produce from the Republic of Ireland going into the UK market
BonnieSituation wrote: Sonny likes to go into a subject deep.
BonnieSituation wrote: He's a much valued contributor on the GAA forums.
Podge_irl wrote: » They literally would be a special case as the only constituent part of an EU member state to declare independence.
Akrasia wrote: » But they are. If Scotland are dragged out of the EU by the English, they will be welcomed back into the EU as an Independent Scotland The people who were championing for an independent Scotland, were challenged by people saying an Independent Scotland would lose membership of the EU and that staying in the UK will guarantee them membership of the EU.. Many of those same exact people who are now saying Scotland should be dragged out of the EU because they're part of the UK
Eric Cartman wrote: » Looking for money. The irony of how many people were championing yes for an independent scotland who are now screaming that brexit won't work. How they thought they were a special case with magical EU entry powers is beyond me.
Stop moaning ffs wrote: » They couldn’t have backed her during Indy ref the first. UK was a member and Eu doesn’t act against members. Now though? They can give Scottish independence full support. And personally delighted to see it. I’d say they’re going to have that referendum even without the ‘required permission’ of parliament. They’ll be fast tracked into EU too. That’ll be a serious bloody nose for that strange breed of brexiter that demands ‘freedom and independence from the EU’ but refuse utterly to let Scottish independence and freedom of the UK happen.
briany wrote: » I don't know if it's the Russian trolls working overtime in the comment sections of the Internet (I'm sure that's got to be at least a significant amount), but every time I see Tony Blair pop up to talk about a current issue - to offer his opinion - it's, "Oh, **** off, Tony. What about the Iraq war, Tony? How dare the war criminal Tony Blair pontificate about ANYTHING." etc. etc. I don't see many sticking up for him, so I think the net result is that he's not the best advocate against Brexit, no matter how much sense he might be talking.