LeinsterDub wrote: » The negotiations have are purely shame at this stage . Both sides offer compromise they know will be rejected in order to win the blame game
spacecoyote wrote: » If its a solution that's amenable broadly to both sides, then the DUP become an irrelevance surely Assuming it offers a Brexit with a "deal" then theoretically they could get it through with a Conservative & enough Labour MPs to get it done, surely? Lib Dem, SNP & DUP wouldn't be enough to stop it, if enough Con & Lab MPs are willing to vote for it. I know its a big "if" around getting Labour MPs to vote for a Boris led Brexit though
ToBeFrank123 wrote: » Another option might be a referendum every four years of the people of NI. Costly but worth it overall.
Stop moaning ffs wrote: » Weird. Sinn Fein also saying no. Thought they would have went for it
Stop moaning ffs wrote: » Weird. Sinn Fein also saying no. Thought they would have went for ithttps://twitter.com/lisaocarroll/status/1181861204450578432?s=21
prawnsambo wrote: » Not really. It would make a brexit deal more likely and a UI less likely.
listermint wrote: » Perhaps they want an electorate decision and not an assembly one Which would be a sound position to take.
prawnsambo wrote: » The thing is, it may not matter what they say. This proposal could bring Labour MPs on board and also many (if not all) of the Tory rebels. The LibDems will oppose it, as will the SNP, but it could go through with opposition (ad hoc) support. edit: and abstentions of course.
Enzokk wrote: » Labour MPs cannot possibly vote for this deal other than those who voted for May's deal. This one is worse than May's deal and in reality you should see less Labour votes for the deal than for May's deal. Remember only 5 Labour MPs voted for May's better deal.
CelticRambler wrote: » What happens if the non-tribal-aligned electorate has a majority over both unionist and republican communities? Sounds like the headbangers will have a permanent veto (unless or until a UI ref changes the status quo)
Stop moaning ffs wrote: » Like clockwork but surprised to see it from the times. Senior Downing Street source at it againhttps://twitter.com/thetimes/status/1181816775236882432?s=21
GM228 wrote: » I guess Johnson just didn't understand what Leo was saying:-https://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1181867285075628032?s=19
GM228 wrote: » Decision from the Inner House to come much earlier today - expected in the next 10 minutes.... Oral submission summary on the Outer House appeal here:-https://www.scottishlawreports.org.uk/publications/exceptional-cases.html
AlmightyCushion wrote: » People saying this double majority vote is more or less as good as the backstop because the nationalist side will never vote to get rid of it have very, very short memories. A few years ago, we were saying Trump would never get the republican nomination, then we were saying he would never win the presidency, then we were saying the UK will never vote to leave the UK. Sometimes the things you think will never happen, actually happen.