Deleted User wrote: » Completely disagree with kens critique of Pep' s handling of the Bernard Silva racism non-story. Ken thought Guardiola should have said something along the lines of "Silva is not a racist but he messed up here". Thus accepting the premise that he was being racist when he clearly was just joking with his friend with no intent to harm or upset him. I admire pep sticking up for his player. At some point in society we need to start saying No to these fake manufactured Twitter outrages. As I say, I think I disagree with Ken' s appeasement approach on this.
Dots1982 wrote: » Dunno really, it’s hard to see the wood from the trees on these things. I’m white so I don’t know/can’t say how offensive the average black person finds these things. I think he should be fined and given sensitivity training. A match ban is too harsh. But Man city is a work place (Not your average one to be fair) But I don’t go around my work place making japes about people’s race, never mind publicizing them on social media. I would regard anyone who did that kind of thing to be a walking liability in the office.
The Davestator wrote: » I see your point, but if you made a 'racial' joke on your own personal social media on your own time, would you accept your employer and possibly, the umbrella organisation for your industry punishing you? i.e Man City & FA
DaaaaaaaaaaN wrote: » Sure even a colleague of mine was dismissed for personal tweets deemed to be racist. It is commonplace for organisations to include clauses regarding Social Media usage in employee contracts. I imagine it would be even more important in the contracts of the likes of professional footballers.
Battery Kinzie wrote: » Big things always seem to happen when Ken goes away for a bit. Colleen vs Rebekah can be added to that list now.
thenightman wrote: » Two talentless leeches arguing about social meeja and leaks to rag like the Sun isn't a big thing. You might want to subscribe to the Heat magazine pod instead.
dulpit wrote: » The Davestator wrote: » I see your point, but if you made a 'racial' joke on your own personal social media on your own time, would you accept your employer and possibly, the umbrella organisation for your industry punishing you? i.e Man City & FA If you are in a public-facing, well-known role then yes.
DaaaaaaaaaaN wrote: » The Davestator wrote: » I see your point, but if you made a 'racial' joke on your own personal social media on your own time, would you accept your employer and possibly, the umbrella organisation for your industry punishing you? i.e Man City & FA Sure even a colleague of mine was dismissed for personal tweets deemed to be racist. It is commonplace for organisations to include clauses regarding Social Media usage in employee contracts. I imagine it would be even more important in the contracts of the likes of professional footballers.
Deleted User wrote: » Bernardo doesn't face the public. He competes against fellow professionals, that is his core responsibility. They might tack on some stuff with sponsors and fans etc but he is hardly in a client relations role.
applehunter wrote: » This is just more liberal left astroturfing. Nobody cares. Wasn't there a chant about some black player having a large penis or something and the same people were moaning. The gentrification of football.:rolleyes:
jaykay74 wrote: » Astroturfing, never heard of it, is it some American sh!te lingo ? It was about Lukaku and he asked them to stop. Maybe he should have not moaned about it ?https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/romelu-lukaku-chant-song-manchester-united-latest-asks-fan-stop-signing-a7965496.html
Still Ill wrote: » Who got to decide if the 'N' word was racist? Who got to decide if blackface is racist?