10000maniacs wrote: » I think what Downing Street was getting at was, if Spain supports an extension, maybe we will get our oranges from Brazil instead. Likewise Olives from Tunisia instead of Italy, Red Bull style drinks from Argentina instead of Austria. etc.
prawnsambo wrote: » How will they know? The Council only announce a decision, not the individual votes that led to that decision.
lawred2 wrote: » dePeatrick wrote: » Theresa May Not a lot has changed then... She never actually said "we will crush the EU" did she? How did I miss that?
dePeatrick wrote: » Theresa May Not a lot has changed then...
Peregrinus wrote: » Any extension has to be agreed unamimously. So, if the Council announces a decision to grant the requested extension, we will know there were 27 votes in favour of that decision, and zero votes against. So what the unnamed Downing St source coughDominicCummingscough is saying is that all 27 will immediately be demoted to last place in the queue of the UK's friends in the EU. Which of course would also be first place in that queue, depending on how you look at it. Honestly, I don't know which is more depressing; the delusions reflected in this threat, or the total incoherence of it.
prawnsambo wrote: » Well it's what Sebastian Payne was saying. It's for internal consumption. Usually (but not always), if it sounds completely crazy and/or nonsensical than it's internally focused. If there's a hint of sanity in it, then it's for the EU. It will also be much quieter.
An Ciarraioch wrote: » Odd, link shows up when I quote the post, but not otherwise?
They thought that if May went then Brexit would get softer.
We will make clear privately and publicly that countries which oppose delay will go the front of the queue for future cooperation — cooperation on things both within and outside EU competences. Those who support delay will go to the bottom of the queue
Johnny Dogs wrote: » The EU should tell them if they want an extension, it should be a minimum 2 year extension for them to get their sh1t together, parliament wise etc, and the rest of the business world could stop putting things on ice due to uncertainty. 2 year extension, or just leave on Halloween.
CelticRambler wrote: » If they continue to demonise Ireland/Leo Varadkar, prompting Ireland to veto the extension request, do we move to the front of the queue for future cooperation? That could be handy - we could ask them to agree to a frictionless border on the island, and move all customs controls to the Irish Sea!
hoody wrote: » Thought this was interesting, it purports to give the current view from the UK government.https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2019/10/how-number-10-view-the-state-of-the-negotiations/amp/?__twitter_impression=true They talk in terms of individual (Varadkar / Barnier etc) rather than collective motivation on the EU side, but if it's to be believed (and it might well be nonsense), it's full throttle for No Deal once the latest proposals founder at the end of this week.
LeinsterDub wrote: » Great take down of this nonsense herehttps://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1181487794012741632
10000maniacs wrote: » I think what Downing Street was getting at was, if Spain supports an extension, maybe we will get our oranges from Brazil instead.
10000maniacs wrote: » Likewise Olives from Tunisia instead of Italy, Red Bull style drinks from Argentina instead of Austria. etc.
Deleted User wrote: » Batten down the hatches :Ihttps://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49970267
darem93 wrote: » I just can't listen to or watch anyone from the DUP speaking. I can feel my blood pressure rising every single time.
Akrasia wrote: » For the past 3 years the UK have been talking up 'no deal' as the nuclear option, their biggest threat and bargaining chip to get the EU to give them a deal. Now they're changed to the real nuclear option, threatening to stay in the EU and be as hostile and intransigent and disruptive as possible in order to demand a No Deal. It's always been the biggest flaw in the 'no deal as threat' strategy that, while a British crash out would be harmful, giving them any deal that undermines the integrity of the single market was worse, so the EU, going for the least worst option, would sadly allow the UK to crash out This is when the UK were trying to get a deal. Now the brextremists are firmly in control and they don't want a deal, they want a crash out, so they have a strategy that is much more likely to work. The strategy that up to now, was never stated publicly because all sensible people realise that the UK needs to be on good terms with the EU if they want to have any chance of developing trade deals in the aftermath of brexit Now, they have come out and stated that their real threat is that they won't leave, and by staying, they will use all of the rules of the EU to undermine the EU, to block and delay and veto any action, to prevent the budgets from passing, to block trade deals, to refuse to cooperate in the spirit of the Single market and Customs union. This is the strategy that was always the most likely to succeed in preventing an extension, but the cost is the future relationship between the UK and the EU and if the UK leaves on bad terms, then even the emergency measures agreed between the EU and UK regarding transport and security cooperation could be in jeopardy. The UK's strategy is to turn itself into a global pariah that no country would be able to do any deals with. And it might just be crazy enough to work
Hurrache wrote: » He's completely deluded. I always think Pat is too soft on them too, maybe someone should tell him that Wilson is also a cyclist, he'd give him a proper grilling then.
Sam Russell wrote: » No, he rides a motorcycle - just like Pat does so a kindred spirit.
A government official told the BBC the EU had not shown a desire to "budge one centimetre" since Boris Johnson submitted new proposals to Brussels.
CelticRambler wrote: » Why aren't they measuring budge in inches? In any case, this whole "doublespeak" approach is both bizarre and puzzling, when we see that Trump's use of the same has made him a laughing stock at the United Nations, seriously damaged the reputation of the US as a reliable partner in any context, and as yet has had no positive effect on the US economy. If the Cummings cabal are using the same instruction manual, why do they think that the UK will fare better than their Big Brother?
Stop moaning ffs wrote: » We know Laura isn’t exactly impartial journalistically speaking but an interesting thread. ‘Sources’ (eyeroll) tell her (I’m weirdly specific detail, Johnson back to calling Merkel this morning only to be told what he’s been told repeatedly before. And he resorts to petty threats and blame. I’m come to the conclusion it’s not that they’re acting in bad faith, Johnson and co simply don’t understand how any of this works at all.https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1181495898431528960?s=21