Ash.J.Williams wrote: » Just moved to Naas ...traffic is horrendous
jmkennedyie wrote: » J10 remaining slip road now surfaced. Still plenty of relevelling required at south end of overbridge so a few weeks away from opening I guess. J9a still needed some line painting yesterday. Possibly landscaping too, so could be next weekend? Lots of fencing and maybe all gantries installed on mainline j10 to j8 but still some tidying up/hard shoulder surfacing to do eastbound Sallins bypass: -canal bridge beams installed -looks like drainage being installed throughout...including Clane end -no obvious activity on link into Sallins village. They could even leave this to very end...after through traffic on the bypass
WishUWereHere wrote: » I'm also in lack of credentials, but I do observe that hardly anything has been touched at the roundabout exiting at J10 SB... I wonder why?
regedit wrote: » Running the risk of being called up for lack of credentials and understanding of the complexity of the project, am I right in my observation that the builders are dragging their heals (reasons?) in completing the main-strip. Is it not 1000% logically for that section to be finalised and then, efforts to be shifted to the Kerry group roundabout, sound barriers and the Sallins bypass.? I drove to Kildare on Wednesday at 10 AM and there was hardly any activity.
pad199207 wrote: » WishUWereHere wrote: » Edit: I think the gantry is now mounted over both sides between J8 & J9. 8 lanes & 2 hardshoulders will give you the size of it. Didn’t think they were going to do it but the auxiliary lane between J8 and J9 is a needed addition
WishUWereHere wrote: » Edit: I think the gantry is now mounted over both sides between J8 & J9. 8 lanes & 2 hardshoulders will give you the size of it.
WishUWereHere wrote: » Noticed the gantry which was in the coned off area just before J9 SB has gone. Anyone know where it is being erected?
Sam Russell wrote: » Option 3: 3. Use variable speed limits with average speed enforcement. If the volume of vehicles is high, then slow them down, and penalise those that do not slow down.
marno21 wrote: » This upgrade was always going to make things worse inbound. There is no longer a bottleneck at Naas so a larger volume of traffic joins the M50 queue quicker. This will only get worse when the M9 merge is fixed There are two options here to solve this 1. Add lanes 2. Remove cars Option 1 has been ruled out by TII so the only viable solution is option 2.
Cazale wrote: » Junction 12-11 was closed early Sunday morning. Might have missed it but I didn't see any advance notice.
Pitch n Putt wrote: » More long delays this morning at the m9-m7 merge. 2 km tailbacks. This stretch of road has been closed /reduced to a single lane since the first week of July. Why does it take so long to finish this piece of the project.Its a complete joke at this stage. It was pretty much a 20 km tailback (no accident anywhere )from Red cow to Kill again this morning. This major project was supposed to alleviate all these issues but it’s actually made things worse inbound. I suppose a €120 million upgrade that makes things worse will be seen as a great success in this country.
Pitch n Putt wrote: » More long delays this morning at the m9-m7 merge. 2 km tailbacks. This stretch of road has been closed /reduced to a single lane since the first week of July. Why does it take so long to finish this piece of the project.Its a complete joke at this stage.
BuzzFish wrote: » Did not go ahead but the crane is on site. I'll post pics later as on mobile.
MYSTICA1 wrote: » Any news on this? Did the beam lifts go ahead yesterday, as planned?
jmkennedyie wrote: » Plans for canal bridge beams to be installed Thursday...with temp road closures underneath... http://www.m7upgrade.com/ Lorenzo may reschedule.
MaceFace wrote: » I've just done the entire run both directions this lunchtime and I'd guess 80% of the vehicles obeyed 80km/h.