boombang wrote: » The following comment is largely motivated by anti CIE bias of mine, but I think even if there was a sound economic rationale for electrification Irish Rail would lack the initiative to get it done.
ohographite wrote: » I would love to see electrification and an hourly service on at least the Dublin-Cork, Dublin-Galway, Dublin-Belfast and Dublin-Waterford railways. I have no idea if this will ever happen, but I don't for one second accept it as wishful thinking to think it will. For environmental reasons, I think this should happen as soon as possible.
L1011 wrote: » Cork is hourly clockface for a while now and it has delivered increases in passenger loadings. We don't have the stock currently for any more services basically. Hourly Belfast plans involve swiping a 22000 set and a 3000 set from existing stock in the short term but neither operator can free those up; plus the 3000 particularly would be a major reduction in product quality. Galway/Waterford/Sligo all require further passing loops / double tracking as far as I know; as well as extra stock
L1011 wrote: » Despite the Netherlands using it extensively, 1500v DC is less than ideal for long distance electrification. That makes it quite unlikely that Belfast will be electrified any time soon
is_that_so wrote: » There's a problem with profitability on most lines. AFAIK only Cork and Belfast offer the numbers.
machaseh wrote: » Train lines are supposed to be a public service, profit is made only on certain lines and serves to support the public service that is a train, it is not the sole purpose of train lines. Of course if virtually nobody uses a line then it may have to close, but this is certainly not the case on any of the routes I suggested.
machaseh wrote: » Dublin to belfast is only 166 km. From Amsterdam to Groningen (north of the Netherlands) is 180 km and that also uses this electrification system, this train line goes mostly through rural area and doesn't have that many stops in between so it would be comparable and runs perfectly fine on this electrification system. The line is, of course, fully electrified. So I call bollox.
L1011 wrote: » I specifically state that the Netherlands uses it despite being sub-optimal and you counter that with an example of the Netherlands using it... which does nothing to prove its not sub-optimal It's an old system nobody would do a long distance buildout anymore
L1011 wrote: » Your aggressive posting style makes it rather pointless to debate with you NS/prorail have an entire country of 1500v DC so they're tied to it; but they still use 25k AC on long distance new builds. It's an ancient system with efficiency problems and a very expensive buildout (vastly more substations and wiring required)
AngryLips wrote: » I thought there was already an hourly service on Dublin-Cork?
is_that_so wrote: » Yes, but the cost is in the lines themselves and IE only get so much money. Electrification is planned around the commuter east coast services. It's a lot easier to do and has the numbers.
ednwireland wrote: » sligo could do with a train that gets there before 9am as well
L1011 wrote: » Theres nothing to suggest that DART Expansion is using anything other than 1500v DC. An entirely new fleet and significant rewiring and replacement of substations would be required to change the existing network to 25kv AC. Dual-mode units that could use both could be obtained instead but this adds cost and complexity
The trains will be compatible with the existing DART network overhead power supply of 1500v DC (i.e. current draw, traction profile under acceleration and re-generation) and also with the power supply for the proposed extension sections.