Earthhorse wrote: » SGM hasn’t taken offense to anything. You’re misreading his posts if you think that. Yet he is the one banned from the thread.
PoisonIvyBelle wrote: » That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. I've given mine.
PoisonIvyBelle wrote: » C'mon now, take it handy. His comments were never an attack on you personally but you have taken them very personally. Why? You got enraged by a lad saying he believes he's attractive and witty. Do you not want to take a minute to think about why that upset you so much? A stranger, on the internet, is confident about his looks and personality, and it offends you to the point of escalating an argument. Take just one minute, that's all. Look back at your posts. Look at his. And think about it. That's the kind of self reflection that will lead to the kind of self awareness that will help you to work on yourself and your own confidence so that you're not bothered by things like this. Re: what you said earlier about messaging a girl a few times if she hasn't replied in case it hadn't "landed". I block those guys. Because I know they know I've read their message. And when I get 2 more in a row I just think "does this guy not have any respect for himself"? You can be sure if I messaged a guy and he didn't reply I wouldn't be chasing him with 2/3 more messages over the next month "in case" he didn't get it. You have two options now: get annoyed at me too and try to start another argument in the thread think about why you reacted how you did and what it means.
Honeydew3456 wrote: » Nothing more attractive than a confident but HUMBLE man....
RacoonQueen wrote: » As would I, personally wouldn't be up to dating someone I work with but it's a way to meet people. If you meet someone in real life and you are interested in them then you decide what you do about it. My whole post was about meeting someone through another aspect and realising you are interested in them rather than going searching for someone. As above. If you are trying to 'find' someone to date is a bizarre concept to me. I don't understand it, the obsession some people have with always being with someone or always having dates lined up is vomit inducing to me. Rather not be dating anyone than date someone just for the sake of it. I've never been one to seek out a date or do or go to something in the hope I meet someone, things always just happen...online and bars and clubs(with the specific intent of 'pulling') would never work for me. That's just me, everyone is different in their approach.
SusieBlue wrote: » Being open to meeting someone with a view of potentially starting a relationship does not mean you're willing to shack up with the first person who gives you a bit of attention I would also rather be alone than be with the wrong guy, but I would like to be in a relationship again so I am putting myself in more situations where I can meet new people and widen my circle, as well as online dating and trying to meet new people that way. When men try to chat me up on a night out I'm far more open to it and willing to engage than I was when I wasn't looking to meet someone. Actively trying to meet someone does not mean you are desperate and "dating just for the sake of it", because you're afraid of being alone. Its taking ownership for your own life and being responsible for your own happiness. Sitting back and just waiting for the perfect person to stumble into your life in a coffee shop or with your eyes meeting across a bar is like something out of a movie, and for the most part, completely unrealistic. These notions are why a lot of people end up alone and disappointed, because they're literally waiting for a miracle to happen. It won't happen without an open mind and a bit of effort.
MetzgerMeister wrote: » Not as long as you keep swiping and using their app (especially if you've a subscription!).
MetzgerMeister wrote: » The likes of Tinder can be a right PITA. Once you've swiped through people nearby you have to increase the distance. There's no guarantee that the people on whom you're now swiping have their distance set to the same thing so you're just swiping for the sake of it with no hope of getting a match but do you think Tinder care? Not as long as you keep swiping and using their app (especially if you've a subscription!).
Homelander wrote: » You can pay to see who likes you, but you can still see who you actually matched with. So people who you didn't swipe on, people that swiped on you outside your distance filters, or whatever. You don't have to pay to match with people, so it still works fine really.
Church on Tuesday wrote: » Don't you have to pay to use Tinder properly now?.
Scarinae wrote: » I don't understand this idea either of trying to meet someone making you 'desperate'. I see online dating or dating apps as a way to widen your circle and meet more people; when I was younger I used to meet people through friends or in college, but as I got older I didn't meet as many new people organically so it made sense to try online dating. I'm marrying someone I met on Tinder, I doubt our paths would ever have crossed without the app.
S.G.M. wrote: » I agree. However, I hear a lot of people saying that 'the right person will find you when ya stop looking'. It's usually people in relationships that say this.
Church on Tuesday wrote: » It will nearly always happen when you least expect it.
Ficheall wrote: » Yep. People are always finding the love of their life when they're stuck on the loo with a dose of the scutters, naming their haemorrhoids for entertainment because they forgot their phone.
Enough is Enough! wrote: » Dating apps? Just move to Thailand and buy a wife.
Church on Tuesday wrote: » Don't you have to pay to use Tinder properly now? I have a few matches I can't see because I'm not on Gold or some ****e. I'm not paying for Tinder.
Ficheall wrote: » I just ask out everyone who thanks my posts on boards and seems female and intelligent.