Overheal wrote: » The exact same is true/was true of a president Hillary though. Same issue, flipped coin. Does this mean evidence and incriminating acts should be ignored on both sides? Either investigation would have been politically motivated to much the same degrees.
Veritas Libertas wrote: » I thought the whole Benghazi-Hilary affair was a farce, as well. I'm happy to see investigations continue but trying to de-platform Trump because he referred it to as a coup is going too far was my point.
Overheal wrote: » It's the Commander in Chief making those remarks. You don't find that to be significant, or even dangerous? For the leader of the United States to shout COUP when Article I powers are being invoked and proclaiming this is "WAR"? ?
Overheal wrote: » I don't see him getting deplatformed - Twitter hasn't so much as chortled.
Asked if he had requested President Xi of China to do so, Trump said, “I haven’t, but clearly it’s something we should start thinking about.”
Overheal wrote: » Tweet served a takedown notice this morninghttps://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/10/03/trump-tweet-of-nickelback-video-aimed-at-biden-removed/?fbclid=IwAR1gH4_PaczPUxZ9EcoWMd9yKisjEb11hyw0f0c3BIEaNC51ammnkrXsOh0 :pac:
Veritas Libertas wrote: » I definitely said trying. Kamala Harris asks Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to consider suspending Trump’s account She included Trump’s tweet calling the impeachment inquiry a “COUP.” come on... :pac:
Overheal wrote: » As pointed out by many she used her own letterhead. Her request wasn’t a senate action
Billy Mays wrote: » I don't read the NY Times bro I base my opinions on Trump on the reams of sh!te that come out of his mouth and his twitter feed which can easily be checked to see whether they're true or not 12,000 plus and counting at this stage
mcmoustache wrote: » I hope they impeach Huner Biden for that.
notobtuse wrote: » Apparently you live by the broken clock. I can’t be sure but I believe the special has something to do with the reporting of award-winning investigative reporter John Solomon, who has now become the target of a brutal smear campaign by Democrats and their scribes in the mainstream media over the uncovering of evidence of DNC corruption in Ukraine. Solomon has worked for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Washington Times, and the Associated Press, and has gone after corruption of both Republicans and Democrats. His recent investigations have show former Vice President Joe Biden used unethical practices to help his son. He also uncovered corruption during the Obama administration, involving key Democratic players like Hillary Clinton and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, as the DNC used Ukraine to launch the Russia collusion probe in an effort to take down President Donald Trump. I suggest you don’t watch it… wouldn’t want you to venture outside your comfort zone of MSNBC, The New York Times, Washington Post and CNN… you know... the Orange Man Bad crowd.
notobtuse wrote: » What was I thinking? Of course Joe Biden’s actions in getting Ukraine prosecutor Shokin fired had nothing to do with his son. Why would he care if his son went to jail, right?
mcmoustache wrote: » Impeachment is not a coup. It's a fairly standard process used as recently as 20 years ago. That particular president just got on with things instead of unhinged rants about coups and treason but I think Presidents were made of sterner stuff back then.
notobtuse wrote: » Can’t impeach Hunter Biden, but it can expose the corruption of Joe Biden and exonerate Trump from wrongdoing for merely doing his job and attempting to get to the bottom of some corrupt US officials actions.
SJW Lover wrote: » Impeachment is absolutely a coup if it is being engineered. Which it is in this case.
Overheal wrote: » In your opinion. How is it being 'engineered?'
notobtuse wrote: » Don’t you find it ironic that the Ukrainian prosecutor Shokin accused Joe Biden, and by extension Barack Obama, of threats to withhold military aid and a quid pro quo, which exactly the impeachable offense that Democrats are accusing Donald Trump of? What am I thinking… of course you don’t. Orange Man Bad!
Outlaw Pete wrote: » You were all so eager to accuse Trump of treason for a minor misarticulation
, but yet look at how many of those around him, including members of his own administration (even officials from the FBI and CIA - emboldened by the mainstream media who have given them all a platform) have behaved. Their objective is clear and that is to undermine the president in the hopes of ousting him from office. How is this not met with the same level of disdain? It absolutely should be and don't make me laugh by suggesting that these people genuinely believe that they are leaking something for the greater good.
If these people don't like that Trump is their president, then they should have waited until 2020 and voted accordingly. That applies to all concerned: from the DNC who tried to steal the election by smearing Trump in the media, to certain sections of Obama's DOJ who helped the DNC with their smear campaign, hoping the electorate would be so swayed. Thankfully they were not, or at least not to the degree that he lost.
The sooner Trump fumigates the west wing of Obama's influence the better.
Not just White House staff but the DOJ and Intelligence communities too. Vermin running to the media with leaks every chance they get a sniff of something they know the leftist media can run with. Comey one of the biggest rats of them all of course, and he was a good catch, but there are undoubtedly others even more sneaky and treacherous than him, if that's possible.
Overheal wrote: » Wonder what 'people' like you will say if/when the whistleblower turns out to be some highly respected face on the right wing that Trump picked himself?
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Karma for Maxine. Six months after encouraging people to harass any members of the Trump administration that they see in public, she's now whinging that she needs security to the grocery store https://twitter.com/ReaganBattalion/status/1179790245052796928
mcmoustache wrote: » I couldn't find anything like that in definitions of coup. Where did you find that one?
SJW Lover wrote: » Why would impeachment be mentioned in the definition of "coup"? Facetiousness wont make your points any more valid.
