Zubeneschamali wrote: » Best of all would be if he has to resign as PM to avoid requesting the extension, since that paints him as a quitter. I don't know if the Tories could allow someone who resigns as PM to lead them into the resulting General Election.
Deleted User wrote: » "we are the party of the NHS" So much so, they voted against its formation TWENTY ONE times.
Tippex wrote: » Did I just hear this correctly "We are proud female employment at record lows"
liamtech wrote: » [*]AND that a possibility exists of the Lib Dems being in 2nd place polls wise going into a GE, and therefore possibly the 2nd largest party coming out
Zubeneschamali wrote: » But Johnson wants the clock to run down, so a delay is good. He simply refuses to follow the so-called law, saying it is invalid for some technical reason, and goes to court to prove it. The longer it takes, the better he likes it. You may say that it breaks all norms for the PM to do that, but we already know he likes breaking norms. The Express already floated the idea of Johnson winning the next election from jail.
prawnsambo wrote: » If he ignores the law, he's in contempt and could face jail.
prawnsambo wrote: » It's not about norms. The Benn Act is law until it's overturned in court. Or parliament. Which is very unlikely. You don't get injunctions against laws while you're challenging them in the courts. The system would fall apart if that were the case. If he ignores the law, he's in contempt and could face jail.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Boris Johnson plan does not achieve a single one of these things. Not one.
nc6000 wrote: » Tippex wrote: » Did I just hear this correctly "We are proud female employment at record lows" I presume he meant to say UNemployment. Strange to have PMQs like that with neither the PM or the opposition leader present.
woohoo!!! wrote: » Should be on the next Led by Donkeys poster.
prawnsambo wrote: » It would need to be mirrored by other polls tbh. YouGov have been a consistent outlier with regard to Tory vote share and the gap to Labour.
Umaro wrote: » I decided to check out how close YouGov got the 2017 election, there's an article about it here. Looks like their polling method was pretty close to the end result: Should definitely be cause for alarm in the Labour party. Could turn out that Corbyn sitting firmly on the fence isn't such a great strategy.
robinph wrote: » Just mentioned on the 1 o'clock news and seemed to be making use of the lack of Johnson for having a standin for Corbyn also to be the first black person to ask a question at the despatch box PMQ as it's black history month.
farmchoice wrote: » the benn act is law, but it requires a person, boris johnson in this case to send a letter, asking the eu for an extension which they may or may not grant. if he fails to do so then the clock ticks down to 31st of October and out they go. the likely court challenge would come from the opposition who will challenge his action or lack of, as unlawful.
LeinsterDub wrote: » https://twitter.com/oconnellhugh/status/1179384886051909634 I except to see a lot more of these kind of announcements
boggerman1 wrote: » Just listened to a loyalist from the north on lbc.rewriting history and there was never any problems at the border.delusional stuff
Tacitus Kilgore wrote: » See, like we've been told for the last 3 and a half years - they're finally throwing us under that bus :pac: