rolion wrote: » Good reports,great systems,happy owners... Hold your optimism for the winter months and i will chat again in spring 2020.
garo wrote: » [HTML][/HTML] sometimes it seems to me that you don’t actualky read what other people have posted. My numbers describe a graph that is very similar to what you posted.
garo wrote: » Didn't rolion figure out a way to charge his car using the excess? I defo plan on rigging something up once I get an EV. My car will be home during the day most of the time.
listermint wrote: » He did. Popping down to the local ESB charger during the day
unkel wrote: » You can buy chargers that can do that, like the Zappi. I already have a charger that was installed for free (previous scheme) and to replace it with something like the Zappi which starts at €750 + install costs would never pay for itself. The (realistic) aim of my home attached battery is to reduce to a minimum the high rate electricity I buy from the grid all year round. I don't mind so much buying 8c electricity from the grid at night when it is at the most environmentally friendly time to use grid electricity. And to be honest, I don't really care about my PV overproduction going back to the grid for free. Call it part of my contribution to revert climate change. That plus my family car being an EV and having 40 solar thermal tubes for my hot water. Limit flights and try eat a bit less meat.
unkel wrote: » Ioniq EV can charge at just 3A (760W) on the granny cable I work from home most days and on a summer day I could plug it in and trickle charge all day, even on a fairly cloudy day Can't be bothered with that though and the minimum on my EVSE charger is 20A (4.9kW), which even in full sunshine, will draw some power from the grid. Can't be bothered with that either so I am happy to just plug in at night. I should have my big battery up before next spring, so I will most likely plug the car in on bright days when my battery is already full (at about 1PM I reckon) and then charge the car to 100% with solar PV only
Batfink69 wrote: » Bump...Don't mind travelling a bit to pick up some hints and tips if someone wouldn't mind me having a look around their setup? Thanks all, Bren
Stefs_42 wrote: » Im Sligo based. so if you dont mind travelling a bit feel free to check out my system
unkel wrote: » The second quote is very good value for money. Can they not stick a 13th panel in though for a tiny bit more money? You'd get an additional 200wp / €700 per kwp, or €140 subsidy. That's more than the cost of a panel (and there is probably not too much extra labour / materials required). Or do you not have the space for it? Did you get any links to the spec sheets of the inverter and batteries? Most systems I have come across (in this thread) would be 48V. Would be interesting to see the specs for that system I'd also try get a quote without the Eddi. If that shaves €500 off the bill, I would go without it. It would have been a waste of an investment if we do end up getting a FIT (which many say is quite likely)
Winterman1234 wrote: » A few more prices today from one company, prices including grant. 4kw array (10 x LG 400W bifacial), Solax 5kw hybrid inverter, Solax triple power 4.5kwh battery and eddi = €7491 3.8kw array (12 x JA 315W bifacial), Solax 5kw hybrid inverter, Solax tiple power 4.5kwh battery and eddi = €6291 3.8kw array (12 x JA 315W bifacial), Solax 5kw hybrid inverter, Solax triple power 6.3kwh battery and eddi =€6899 The batteries operate around the 100volt dc range not the typical 48V. Regarding the bifacial panels, both manufacturers state outputs ranging 5 -30% higher than panel ratings during direct sun conditions, not sure in real world conditions if there is actually any gain to be had. This is the first quote I received with the bifacial panels.
Alkers wrote: » Before or after grant?
garo wrote: » Yes agree. Those are excellent quotes. If the people giving those quotes know what they are doing that is far and away the best deal on this thread. Also agree about the 13th panel for maximising the subsidy and asking for the white withiut the Eddi. I assume the installation here will not require scaffolding because otherwise it is a steal!
unkel wrote: » I take it that's not a serious question? The cost of the materials alone would be close enough to the quoted prices before the grant and they sure ain't doing the install job for free
Alkers wrote: » I've had quotes of sub 5k (post grant) for 3.75kW array with 2.4kWh battery and no diverter so I don't think my query was that mad?!
unkel wrote: » Did you post those? I don't remember any sub 5k quotes for a battery system in this thread.
unkel wrote: » I guess you can come back here on the first anniversary of your system and tell us if it did make the 3.53MWh (your system is 4kwp, right?) I'll do the same, but I expect my 3.8kwp in sunny west Dublin (limited by my 3.6kW inverter) S/W (but mostly south) to have generated close enough to 3.6MWh, possibly even a bit more.
garo wrote: » Sep predicted: 355kWh Actual: 350.9 Note this is power at the panel so does not take inverter inefficiencies into account.