GarIT wrote: » I watch for the strategy couldn't really care who is overtaking who. And I feel the opposite about the Ferrari situation, LeClerc would be far ahead of Vettel if LeClerc wasn't playing the team game all the time and then Vettel won't give back the help he is being given. Vettel needs to be dropped for Hulk or Alonso. Whatever happens LeClerc needs to stop playing the team game and get talking to Mercedes and Red Bull.
meeeeh wrote: » Anyway Vettel and Leclerc is good, despite their bickering Ferrari can actually attempt strategic racing using their second driver.
GarIT wrote: » Did you not hear Vettel yesterday? I think they would have a hard time trying to convince him to be a full time wingman for LeClerc.
uchimata83 wrote: » Brutal, where was Brundle today? It's a clown show without him
PopePalpatine wrote: » He misses a few races every year because of health concerns. Sure beats putting up with David Croft's shïtstirring.
recyclebin wrote: » Le Clerc will have learned a lot so far this season. I can see a Hamilton/Rosberg type scenario developing where both Ferrari will take each other out at first corner just to prove a point.
eviltimeban wrote: » Is it health though? I read somewhere that he only commits to X number of races, so if there are more on the calendar he doesn't do them. He's hardly watching his health if he's racing!
meeeeh wrote: » There is a running joke in our house that according to Autosport Ferrari should give a chance to Kubica and Hulkenberg. They deserve it. No sane Ferrari fan would want either Hulkenberg or Alonso. One had enough chances and didn't even manage the podium and the other one would burn down his own garage if it suited them. Maybe Mercedes should replace Bottas with one of them or maybe they should both go to McLaren. I'm sure they will win everything next year with their fastest chassis on the grid. Anyway Vettel and Leclerc is good, despite their bickering Ferrari can actually attempt strategic racing using their second driver.
astrofluff wrote: » Its fairly obvious that Vettel is not a team player, or at least, won't give up a win unnecessarily. Multi 21 is all Charles needs to know. He shouldn't be fooled twice and should now just race for himself, and help the team only if it utilmately benefits him.
GarIT wrote: » Did you not hear Vettel yesterday? I think they would have a hard time trying to convince him to be a full time wingman for LeClerc. Unless you think someone on Verstappen's level should be number two to someone who was beaten by Ricciardo.
meeeeh wrote: » Well the new Verstappen should be first able to get close enough to his teammate. Yesterday Leclerc wasn't able to follow Vettel. At the moment Leclerc won 2 races hell have to show a bit more before he can claim no1 status. I like Leclerc and he reminds me of young Schumacher but it will take a bit longer to establish how good he actually is. Vettel was much better getting through the traffic in Singapore for example.
eviltimeban wrote: » Much as I like Hulk, if he went to Ferrari he'd be a definite number 2 driver. Sure, he might get a few wins and podiums but he would never be the favourite.
chicorytip wrote: » Leclerc is a very fortunate young man indeed to have landed the Ferrari gig so early in his career. Verstappen is a much more accomplished racer but has made a mistake signing with Red Bull again. He needs to be in a silver or red car. Vettel is desperate to win a title with Ferrari but the team bosses clearly no longer want him around.
BikeRacer wrote: » You might call it a team player, I'd call it a ruthless winners mentality. If you want to be a world champion, I think you need to turn into a selfish pr*ck on track. As you say, lesson learned.
PopePalpatine wrote: » I'd say Ferrari's leaning towards Leclerc is because he offers more of an upside than a - let's face it - aging Vettel who's got a family to worry about. Ferrari also have form in ousting Germans in favour of younger talent.