Slattsy wrote: » Has anyone called the ISPCC over those parents? Should be named and shamed. Disgraceful carry on, reading about it has turned me right off my lobster dinner.
odyssey06 wrote: » In this crazy world where referring to people's county of allegiance is seen as militant and parochial I'm not familiar with the 'rules'. And when I say rules, what I mean are arbitrary constructs worthy of no serious respect or consideration or even further observation.
MayoAreMagic wrote: » But you arent referring to peoples county of allegiance at all. There is no county called non-dubs. What you are in fact doing is referring to your own singular county, and then identifying everyone else from everywhere else in terms of whether they are from that county or not. Why not just refer to people as where they are from as opposed to where they are not from? It displays very much us v the rest mentality from the outset. But there is no rest and maybe dubs would do well to break from that way of thinking. There is no basis of truth in the 31v1 mentality. The fact that the funding was ok'd by everyone else in the first place shows that. Would you have ok'd that money for the 'non-dubs'? It doesnt look like it
MayoAreMagic wrote: » What is wrong with just saying non-dub? If you are attempting to refer to people who are not from dublin, then logically you would think it is perfectly apt. Where is the requirment for a demeaning phrase there? That is like someone saying, what else can I call dubs, but jackeens? Or what else can I call black people but the n word? Better yet, stop thinking of people as dubs and non dubs. Why are you lumping everyone else into one category? It points to a real parochial, and kinda militant outlook, that I dont really understand. I mean you live 30 odd miles from these people, you cant be as different as you seem to believe you are.
Slattsy wrote: » Has anyone called the ISPCC over those parents? Should be named and shamed. Disgraceful carry on, reading about it has turned me right off my lobster dinner. You people should start a thread in AH, or here; much of a muchness lately.
MayoAreMagic wrote: » In that scenario it is bad form. If they are meath born or kildare born etc, then that should be the county they aspire to play for. If the plethora of 'culchie' parents of the current dublin squad had decided to do the same, dublin would be short a hell of a lot of players.
ArielAtom wrote: » So bringing kids to witness how football should be played is a bad thing??
beggars_bush wrote: » Glorified Basketball They'd be better off playing with their friends on their club team than being brought up to games not involving their own county And the father in question is an expert at everything, but never gets involved with coaching a team.
MayoAreMagic wrote: » And yet, dublin being serial underachievers was a fact of life. But there was an intervention which changed the game entirely. So obviously, the gaa dont share you opinion, and considering you never complained about that, you must have only developed this view very, very recently. Self-serving indeed... That is what undermines this stance that many dubs om this thread push, where they talk about disparities and things not being fair being normal in sport. When it was dublin in that situation, this famed natural order was deliberately changed. Which in turn, totally undermines any railing against another change to it. You cant have it every way. If guys want natural order then dublin need to pay back all monies taken and move forward from there. You cant pick and choose what parts of the natural order you want. That isnt natural order, it is just your ideal situation.
aodomhnaill wrote: » https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/millionaire-withholds-250000-from-mayo-county-board-38536084.html Anything to say about this mayoaremagic? €415k in one year from a single investor. €60k training camps in New York, any thoughts? Interesting to read just how inept and dysfunctional the mayo county board, this type of stuff generally filters down to players on the field as we all know.
Rockbeast2 wrote: » This will be fun!https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/millionaire-withholds-250000-from-mayo-county-board-38536084.html
kilns wrote: » I look forward to Ewan McKennas next article on the plucky underdogs from Mayo who have no money....
Dots1982 wrote: » Mayo GAA fundraised 1.761 million in two years. Dublin raised 161k in 3 years. All according to their own accounts. In the same two year period Dublin paid 2 million in administration expenses (half are salaries). Mayo paid 130k for the same expenses for the same two years.I know which one i think is more likely to be inept and dysfunctional. Especially given wages in the Dublin GAA is out of control.
Rockbeast2 wrote: » Mayo, Galway, and Cork all have serious issues with their county boards IMO. Dublin sorted theirs out years ago and it has played a major part in the county's success over last decade.
Bonniedog wrote: » I find the Pale is often used by people from counties that didn't let off a fart in their corduroys in 16 and after, so have this guilt thing about Dublin. I think True Gael is from the kingdom, which in fairness redeemed itself after the betrayal of Roger Casement.
Rockbeast2 wrote: » "Competent administration is important in sporting success but much bigger factors in this case are the money, population and home advantage." LOL. A fish rots from the head down. * Sorry, cant quote as on ancient PC :-(