Veritas Libertas wrote: » There was an episode of South Park season 8 episode 15 entitled "Ass Burgers". In it the theme was Cartman coping with aspergers, they were trying to make fun of the ridiculousness of certain things associated with autism. Perhaps this is also what the poster was doing?
Veritas Libertas wrote: » More realistic proposal: We could have developed cheaper, affordable carbon scrubbers by then.
joe40 wrote: » That's what f**cks up debate. Could you not just make your point without referring to aspergers as ass burgers.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » That wouldn't be my interpretation. Looked like a 17 year old lashing out in frustrated ignorance to me. Can't take the woke anymore.
Jane Wonderful Inch wrote: » A few outliers. Why do you think that is? Potentially because the few who did comment negatively got absolutely ruined by her sheep, for attacking a 16 year old with ass burgers. I wish I was 16 with that condition, it appears you can say and do as you please with absolutely no consequences.
Eric Cartman wrote: » ryan is no stranger to kids saying outrageous things because of autism spectrum conditions : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ih3SZbJz8wg
Veritas Libertas wrote: » I'm not easily shocked.. but wow.. just wow...:eek: If you don't laugh at that, how else can you respond?
Calhoun wrote: » This is the definition of privilege if there ever was one. If you have any experience with autism you would not wish to had it. The reason some folk with it get to say things that may come across as blunt is that we understand as individuals that do not have the condition that they filter an perceive the world differently.
Jane Wonderful Inch wrote: » Hang on a second, again you are using the Asperger's as a reason that she cannot be criticised. It's not the condition that is making her say these things. But the condition allows her to say what she wants without being criticised.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » I see you've stopped calling it "ass burgers". A small step to maturity.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » So you think the negative outweighed the positive in what she did? I disagree.
Gaoth Laidir wrote: » Great, so we're going to have to put up with more of her antics till at least next September? Still, if she were my daughter I'd probably want to send her off on the slow boat to the US too. Sounds like a little terror to live with if what you said is true.
Calhoun wrote: » No what i am saying is you can pick apart what she is saying but what the past couple of posts have descended into is attacking her because she has autism.
Jane Wonderful Inch wrote: » Where did I attack her Autism... Autism only comes into the equation when her defenders have nothing else to give out about.
gozunda wrote: » That was my recollection of an interview with some US TV anchor who interviewed her. I'll see if I can find the video ...
Jane Wonderful Inch wrote: » ...for attacking a 16 year old with ass burgers.
Tell me how wrote: » What do you think motivated 4M people to protest for climate action last Friday? And once again you are dismayed by people challenging this criticism and while it might be genuine in that it is their personal belief, it is not above being challenged and has been found largely to be sourced solely from that basis of personal opinion rather than objective evidence.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » Peer reviewed research is the most reliable research.
hetuzozaho wrote: » link to twitter
weldoninhio wrote: » Peer Reviewed Paper Curry & Lewis paper – Climate models exaggerating up to 45% warminghttps://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0667.1
