whatawaster wrote: » . On those numbers, he would find it very difficult to get re-elected.
he has enduring appeal to about 45 percent of the electorate as long as the economy hums along and we’re at peace with the world.[...]People need to remember that Trump does not need to win the popular vote to get reelected. All he has to do is win the electoral college, and he can do that without having to worry about whom the Democrats nominate if he can get his job approval ratings up to about 47 percent. That’s because the opposition to Trump is centered in states such as California and New York that will vote Democratic anyway, driving his national numbers down without affecting the electoral college.
Veritas Libertas wrote: » I just finished reading an article for Washington Post that argued the opposite:Trump’s approval ratings are bad news for Democrats
whatawaster wrote: » His approval rating from 538 (which weights polls according to their quality and adjusts them for bias (Rasmussen) has not been above 43% in 2 years. His average closer to 41% Nowhere near 45% and certainly not 47%. And that's with a strong economy. Doesn't sound like it's about to improve in the next few weeks.
Hobosan wrote: » Where was the talk of impeachment during the Bush and Obama years? Ignore the worst crimes under the sun, including torture, mass surveillance and catastrophic invasions, but lose your mind over Trump, who is positively benign in comparison, despite what the never ending circus performers would have you believe. Maniacs.
Matt Barrett wrote: » But that's mainstream liberal media right? ************
notobtuse wrote: » IMO… it about DISTRACTION.
Veritas Libertas wrote: » Isn't this an ultimatum? Didn't Pelosi specifically issue an ultimatum to Trump to release the transcript or impeachment will begin? Hasn't trump already agreed to release the transcript? It seems if they were just looking for a distraction, they could have gone full stream ahead with the impeachment, and not issued an ultimatum first. Something has changed Pelosi's mind here in a matter of days; I can't wait to see what it was.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Democrats are really making a show of themselves at this stage
notobtuse wrote: » Impeachment for what? You can't impeach a president based on suspicion or conjecture.
Veritas Libertas wrote: » You think that would have stopped them? Look how they treated Sanders, they will go low. Pelosi is not as crazy as the others IMO.
notobtuse wrote: » True that she is not as crazy as the others, but it also proves she's no longer the leader she once was.
Veritas Libertas wrote: » I thought that when I saw her slur her words alright. Fearful times when we're worried about Pelosi being replaced by the crazys.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Do you think the same when you hear Trump slurring his words?
Veritas Libertas wrote: » Are you seriously comparing how Pelosi slurred her words in the first post video, to anything that Trump has ever done? Could you please put up the worst video you've seen of Trump doing it, so we can compare- Ta.
whatawaster wrote: » They have found plenty on Trump, and plenty of dirt on him is in the public domain.Corruption (enriching himself during his presidency) Multiple instances of obstruction of justice Leaking of classified information Cosying up the dictators Alienating allies
Veritas Libertas wrote: » Are you seriously comparing how Pelosi slurred her words in the first post video, to anything that Trump has ever done? Could you please put up the worst video you've seen of Trump doing it, so we can compare- Ta. Trump is six years younger than her. I like Pelosi so I don't want this to come across as an attack, but she is looking and sounding frail these days...
Cody montana wrote: » He got his Vice Presidents name wrong recently. Mike Pounce. Not to mention Tim Apple.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » https://youtu.be/p_Rkidmhxishttps://youtu.be/gza7H3zG4g8 Sounds drunk but he's a tee totaller apparently.