Gunnar Shrilling Saint wrote: » I’ve had the pleasure of being invited to several homes of young families recently and by young I mean new parents in their late 30’s and 40’s... I’m aghast at how much crap people accumulate in their homes! Ikea boxes full of kids toys shoved in corners. My experience is limited to Dublin where all the “young” families with their delusions of grandeur want to live in the south east part of Dublin in houses they can barely afford all the while their lives are in chaos with plastic toys strewn everywhere, both working, 2 cars, hand-balling kids, 9 - 5, dinner Seriously, one of the parents needs to stay home and organise their lives.
Day Lewin wrote: » Not to mention, all those plastic toys are terrible for the planet And the cars Simplify your lives, people! Or there won't be much of a future for those kids :-(
Lance-kun wrote: » It's very likely that some people want to give their children what they never had as youths.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » You drunk, pal?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Probably a mixture of two things OP. Increased levels of consumerism, and smaller homes. Your typical three bed entry-level home in the 1970s was probably 30% larger than today's version. Not that today's entry-level property typically isn't a three-bed in the first place. Property sizes are shrinking and we have more 'stuff'.
banie01 wrote: » Because family homes are lived in, and life doesn't revolve around staging ones home for the review of judgemental pricks or social media... Wonder how Mrs Hinches gaff will look when she's coping with a baby rather than a pampered pooch?
IAMAMORON wrote: » Your starting early Ebeneezer. At least wait until after Halloween before kicking off. How other families and households live their lives is none of your business....
Gunnar Shrilling Saint wrote: » Nonsense. Sounds like your making excuses. That’s like the people who wear track suits every day because they want to be comfortable.
cjmc wrote: » Yep MYOB With 2 , only 2, my house is a kip. With toys etc ( are you gonna put them away after every play!), hankies / kitchen roll near at hand , food preparation for 3 dinners, accidents. I could go on and on. But you know what, we have great craic mostly so stay in your ivory palace and don't bother the neighbour's
Gunnar Shrilling Saint wrote: » Who else is going to put it away? I don’t understand, is this a new phenomenon that families never had to deal with before it just your household?
Gunnar Shrilling Saint wrote: » What, a messy house, chaotic life, absentee parents and processed food?
Gunnar Shrilling Saint wrote: » one of the parents needs to stay home and organise their lives.
Lance-kun wrote: » Houses are lived in. Unfortunately both parents usually have to work these days to afford housing and childcare. Just because it's not up to your snobby standards doesn't mean their lives are any worse than yours. Having a neat and tidy home doesn't mean anything if the people in it aren't happy and vice versa. Your standards are not theirs.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » I, personally, would recommend any household, regardless of whether there are children present or not, that has two working adults to get a “cleaner” in, at least, once a week. There is nothing worse than spending your evenings and weekends playing “catch up” on housework. For the cost involved you could, easily, forgo the pizza, Chinese, Indian or whatever “take away” you enjoy. Or skip a night out every once in awhile.
italodisco wrote: » I am on of these mess folk. My wife buys toys non stop for the kid, house if strewn with toys. Not to mention the dust. No sex life, worrying about money 24/7.... I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy. Both our faults