2thousand14 wrote: » I read a post near the start of this thread which I think is the most likely reason for all this. The IRA back in the troubles were gaining heavily due to the operation of the Quinn company. And then that all stopped after the takeover and they weren’t happy.
Danzy wrote: » Whoever is doing this is paid well to keep it up. That is the sole reason it is done. There is a 20 year gap in your explanation.
celt262 wrote: » Someone will start singing at some stage and the truth will come out.
celt262 wrote: » How were they gaining heavily?
shesty wrote: » Apart from those in the area who continue to believe that he is the best thing ever.
ToBeFrank123 wrote: » The inaction of guards in the area for the last 5 years is the next big scandal in the force. Sounds like they didn't want to rock the boat in Quinn country and turned a blind eye to intimidation and death threats.
heldel00 wrote: » Quinn paid a chunk of "protection money" yearly, to be left alone to go about his business, making a fortune. This was a handy earner for "the lads" and everyone was kept happy New heads take over and refuse to pay. The handy earner is gone and it's seen as huge disrespect. These people are not used to hearing the word no and are used to getting their own way.
tdf7187 wrote: » It's a plausible theory nevertheless. 20 year gap? Yes but what employment opportunities are there for former terrorists?
STB. wrote: » I'd have to say I am in total agreement with Daniel McConnell view in the Irish Examiner.https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/views/columnists/lunney-was-assaulted-quinn-is-not-the-victim-952090.html
heldel00 wrote: » The world and his wife know the culprits. They'll be got and there'll be a real clanger for the media in it too.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Is there a contradiction in the article? “All I can do is send out my condolences to Kevin and Bronagh and whatever number of children they have. Express my sympathy to them. My view is you wouldn’t do that to a dog. It is not natural; it is barbaric,” he said. "Not once did he wish Lunney well in his recovery; not once. But that might have been an oversight"
Happy4all wrote: » heldel00 wrote: » The world and his wife know the culprits. They'll be got and there'll be a real clanger for the media in it too. I don't
heldel00 wrote: » Edited to add - The world and his wife, in the locality, ....
Odhinn wrote: » There's been attacks against property and various threats made since the Quinn family were removed.
realitykeeper wrote: » I would not condone those attacks but I can understand why they happened. Sean Quinn is not a Dub. The vulture jackeens moved against him after they mis sold Anglo as a AAA+ investment.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » If only there was some way that poor Sean could have got independent advice to understand the risks he was taking on? Have a read of that Currency article to see how risk assessment wasn't part of his language. Mis sold? This wasn't a case of payment protection insurance. This was a billion euro gamble to take control of the bank, because being multi millionaires just wasn't enough and he had to over reach as he strived to make them all billionaires. It was greed - plain and simple.