SJW Lover wrote: » I've learnt you are an easily manipulated person. Let me find a 15 year old to convince you of that
weldoninhio wrote: » I think I’m beginning to get it. You like the green new deal. Pity it is never going to happen. The likes of AOC will be back to serving coffee once they next US elections take place. Numerous polls have her decimated.
Wanderer78 wrote: » they own the platform, they can do what they will with it, all media is censored and controlled, we dont have freedom of press or freedom of speech, its not our reality
Tell me how wrote: » Yes. The IPCC report from 8th October, 2018. Knock yourself out. That is what she is using to justify her views after all.
weldoninhio wrote: » You commend Greta for stomping her feet bf throwing tantrum after tantrum? Because that is literally all she has done. That and refused to go to school or get a job.
SJW Lover wrote: » Plus he's someone who has some expertise in this field or at least in related fields. What are Greta's qualifications in this area? Any published papers i can have a look at?
hetuzozaho wrote: » You don't know me at all so.
tigerboon wrote: » She's 16. Probably wouldn't have much publications to her name. Great to see young people stirring it up a bit though.
SJW Lover wrote: » Why should i listen to Greta?
SJW Lover wrote: » You're nothing but useful fodder.
Tell me how wrote: » Because age has warranted invitations from the EU, UN, US Congress and HoC amongst others to communicate her message. Because she has won numerous awards for her efforts. Because she has been nominated for a Nobel prize for efforts. Because she motivated 4M people to March on a single day calling for action on the climate. Because her message is supported by renowned climate change commentators. Because she is simply saying listen to the scientists. Are these enough reasons for you? If not, why not?
SJW Lover wrote: » So, zero qualifications.
SJW Lover wrote: » No, they're not actually.
Tell me how wrote: » I'd say the 4M people who marched last week are indicative as to how many around the world feel about the problem.
weldoninhio wrote: » You could organise a strike against pretty much anything that gave school kids a day off and they’d be out in force. We want lemonade in our taps instead of water. Strike!! We need Love Island on all year round. Strike!! In fairness to those pulling St Gretas strings, the guy who came up with the ‘school strike’ was onto something. An immediate innocent rent a crowd who’d be buzzing for a day off school.
walshb wrote: » Is it a case of get off the stage now, love?
walshb wrote: » Is this the end of Greta now? I mean, she’s made her point... Is it a case of get off the stage now, love?
Tell me how wrote: » Cool. Why don't you organise something so and see how many you get. You pick the topic. I don't care how ridiculous it sounds to me, let's see how much interest you get.
Calhoun wrote: » Who knows either way I hope she is looked after
hetuzozaho wrote: » I think she is fine, even has endorsements from the president of the USA in her twitter bio
Calhoun wrote: » Her PR team have the endorsement you mean. She is on the spectrum so may not adjust or be adjusting to the current popularity. It will have an impact long after the cameras are gone.
iamwhoiam wrote: » Fair point !! Not the majority I imagine
hetuzozaho wrote: » No the president specially spoke of her. Fantastic endorsement
weldoninhio wrote: » You could organise a strike against pretty much anything that gave school kids a day off and they’d be out in force. We want lemonade in our taps instead of water. Strike!! We need Love Island on all year round. Strike!!
An enhanced greenhouse effect from CO2 has been confirmed by multiple lines of empirical evidence. Satellite measurements of infrared spectra over the past 40 years observe less energy escaping to space at the wavelengths associated with CO2. Surface measurements find more downward infrared radiation warming the planet's surface. This provides a direct, empirical causal link between CO2 and global warming.
The amount of warming caused by the anthropogenic increase in atmospheric CO2 may be one of the most misunderstood subjects in climate science. Many people think the anthropogenic warming can't be quantified, many others think it must be an insignificant amount. However, climate scientists have indeed quantified the anthropogenic contribution to global warming using empirical observations and fundamental physical equations.
