Mastermcgrath wrote: » By all intents and purposes this process has been kept very much under wraps and it’s no harm. No one seems to know whose getting it, compared to the shambles that went on last year it’s refreshing
whiteandblue wrote: » Just to put into context, I have no idea how true the rumours are but will comment on Cahill's supposedly imminent appointment. A brave but very interesting appointment, think it's a positive move. Cahill was won minor and 2 under 21 All-Irelands, and in 2018, he managed to turn around a tough defeat to Cork in the Munster final to win the All-Ireland against the same opposition. He is also bringing Michael Bevans as coach (supposedly) who is very highly thought of in Tipperary as a coach. Cahill has no history or loyalty to any players within Waterford. All will have to prove their worth and earn their place on the panel and work off a clean slate. The make-up of the backroom team will be interesting as I'm sure he will look to include people with good knowledge of the players around the county as a starting point to make up a training and trial panel, giving all players around the county a chance who are felt good enough. Possibly a few members with intercounty experience would be valuable assets as well. For all the criticism we give the county board, if true, I think it would be a good appointment.
spideyman92 wrote: » I wonder does a Cahill appointment rule out Seán Power ever getting the job. Has similarish success Either he doesn't want it or players / County board must not want him?
PTH2009 wrote: » https://twitter.com/liamcahill16?lang=en out potential new bosses Twitter page for anyone who wants to follow it
hardybuck wrote: » I think only Sean Power can really influence his future chances if he actually wants the thing. If he does, best thing he can do is produce success at a high level elsewhere.
Mastermcgrath wrote: » the one thing that we’ve actually been told is that it’s not Queally. Hard not to feel bad for him. It’s the third time he’s went for the job and been knocked back.
Relhcstirt wrote: » Any update on the redevelopment of Walsh Park?
Stopitwillya wrote: » Another excellent post Giveitfong. I love reading your posts and usually agree with all you have to say. You have a great understanding of the game and like you I believe the likes of the Bennett's, Patrick Curran and Maurice are more than good enough if we played to their strenghts. Whoever you are, the new Waterford manager could do alot worse than have you on board in some capacity.
thesaturdayman wrote: » Is this a wind up ? You do realize they are 20 years trying to do it. It will never be done. A slap up effort. Lipstick on a pig.
Lingoweet913 wrote: » Amazing we’ve some positive news and some come back to trash talk instead.
thesaturdayman wrote: » Nothing positive yet. Been here before. See Matty Kenny, Pat Ryan, Brendan Cummins. It is at least a step in right direction Questions remain. Plenty of them. Such as how are we financing this? Or should we say what well known person is! Why is our board a totally unsustainable business entity that allegedly needs handouts for us to do fundamental things like put decent mgmt teams in place! This is like the time people spent months congratulating the board for cutting the grass in Walsh park & having the place looking respectable / acceptable. Bread and butter stuff. These conversations don’t happen in any other county! Dunno much about Cahill, people in the know seem happy, so do players, that’s good enough for me, how they play I couldn’t care less once they are winning again, but I do feel Peter Queally was sent down the river. Again. Which he doesn’t deserve. A slap in the face to great serveant.