Kalyke wrote: » Can the HoC impeach Johnson?
Sam Russell wrote: » BBC reporting that this verdict was totally a surprise, unseen by everyone.
Igotadose wrote: » Next move? Call for an extension now, for an election in, say, 3 weeks? Once the election's decided, isn't it a few weeks before the new government comes in?
VinLieger wrote: » What i really love is the potential for the Tories to miss their conference window is Bercow reopens immediately
LeinsterDub wrote: » What would that achieve? A simple VONC will do
sjb25 wrote: » Bercow "HOC resumes tomorrow 11.30"
For Forks Sake wrote: » When's Boris due back from the UN?
Itssoeasy wrote: » It's just gone 7am in New York where Boris Johnson is today and I'd say the full english he's most likely having isn't tasting that nice. Did I hear right and the brexiteers want to appeal this to the ECJ ?
Dytalus wrote: » It's a national matter, not involving EU law. They can't refer it to the ECJ - as much as that be the final, ironic, punchline.
robinph wrote: » What happens if the HoC is open, but the leader of the house (Mogg) doesn't turn up to set out each days order of business?
prunudo wrote: » So nobody will be there from the UK side to negotiate any deal or amendments.
Chips Lovell wrote: » Mod Note I know this is a fast moving thread and, today in particular, people may be quite excited/passionate about what's happening. However, please do read the charter and heed it. In particular; Please remember that we are not a blog, a news feed nor an announcement forum - if you are not willing to discuss what you post, then please don't post it. Thread will be locked and posters may face a sanction for repeatedly breaking this rule. This forum is for discussion and debate and we will not tolerate soapboxing. If you are here to "shout everyone down" with your opinions, we will see you as a negative contributor to the forum and will take appropriate action. High standards of debate and quality posts / threads are required. Repeated one liner, low quality style posts will result in a ban. Keep your language civil, particularly when referring to other posters and people in the public eye. Using unsavoury language does not add to your argument. Examples would be referring to other people or groups as scumbags, crusties, sheeple, shills, trolls, traitors or saying that recently deceased people should “rot in hell” or similar. Repeated use of terms like that will result in a ban from the forum. You can make your point without having to resort to unparliamentary language.
Please remember that we are not a blog, a news feed nor an announcement forum - if you are not willing to discuss what you post, then please don't post it. Thread will be locked and posters may face a sanction for repeatedly breaking this rule. This forum is for discussion and debate and we will not tolerate soapboxing. If you are here to "shout everyone down" with your opinions, we will see you as a negative contributor to the forum and will take appropriate action. High standards of debate and quality posts / threads are required. Repeated one liner, low quality style posts will result in a ban.
Keep your language civil, particularly when referring to other posters and people in the public eye. Using unsavoury language does not add to your argument. Examples would be referring to other people or groups as scumbags, crusties, sheeple, shills, trolls, traitors or saying that recently deceased people should “rot in hell” or similar. Repeated use of terms like that will result in a ban from the forum.
Chips Lovell wrote: » If there is an election, the campaign will be dominated by Brexit and will be vicious. There's a chance it could lead to the biggest realignment in British politics since the 1920s.
Chips Lovell wrote: » Quite possible that Corbyn will now agree to vote for an election in exchange for Boris requesting another lengthy extension from the EU. Johnson has nowhere else to go.