Galwayguy35 wrote: » The look she gave Trump when he came in to the room was like someone who was about to have a temper tantrum. If you want to get the people on board and change minds about tackling climate change having a rich kid with far left ideas shouting at them isn't the way to go about it. Leo was all about slapping carbon taxes on us over in NY yesterday, seems like he is forgetting there is an election coming up here.
Veritas Libertas wrote: » The Australian 'Tommy Robinson' gets banned from twitter for tweeting about Greta.
kevcos wrote: » Given the planet is ~4.5 billion year old can you explain why you are graphing only the most recent 50 years? Surely only graphing 50 years out of an elapsed 4-5 billion year is regarded as an insignificant snap shot?
weldoninhio wrote: » The temperature was higher in the past, beyond your 50 years. Was that the dinosaurs fault? Too many dino-engines?
relax carry on wrote: » Trump has more than earned any deriding looks he gets. I love how some people view everything through the prism of Politics. Why can't it for once just be about a passionate individual advocating for a better world without people projecting their own fears onto the message/messenger.
Wanderer78 wrote: » ...and comes across as being a right arsehole, just like robinson, oh and autistic people have a tenancy to catastrophe
cfuserkildare wrote: » Because the supposed " Facts " being quoted are inaccurate! The events we are facing are part of a Natural Cycle, and there is very little we can do to stop what is coming, Other than prepare for it.All the time being spent replacing single use plastics would be better spent finding a Proper alternative power source!
Veritas Libertas wrote: » It's to explain the significance of the extra co2 in the atmosphere, which has been steadily rising since pre industrial averages of 280 parts/million. This extra co2 has contributed to a man made warming.
Veritas Libertas wrote: » Being an asshole shouldn't give twitter the right to ban him like that. He was expressing the views of many in this thread - me included.
Deleted User wrote: » The poor child needs to be loved. What parent encourages such fear in their child?
biko wrote: » This is from the last 2000 years (I cannot speak to its validity, is from Wikipedia)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record_of_the_past_1000_years
Wanderer78 wrote: » they own the platform, they can do what they will with it, all media is censored and controlled, we dont have freedom of press or freedom of speech, its not our reality
realitykeeper wrote: » I said it was other news. But who am I to stop people from coming to their own conclusions.
kevcos wrote: » Again, I'm not disputing the 50 year data but I think it needs context.
Tell me how wrote: » Wow. 'This girl has no right to talk about climate problems, I mean what could she know about any of it. But I can deduce that she is on medication based on watching a clip of her on TV.'
Randle P. McMurphy wrote: » So much vitriol and hatred in this thread aimed at a 16yo girl. So much ignorance and denial. She has more courage, intelligence and gumption than the lot of you put together.
Tell me how wrote: » She was challenged by her opinions at the US congress last week.
drunkmonkey wrote: » The man's a living legend : )
Omackeral wrote: » At the same time you've hyperbole and dealing in absolutes. Question anything and you're "directing ire at a child". Also have noticed the usual ugliness of right vs left creeping in. That's a poxy factor in everything nowadays and it's tiresome. If you have a problem with Margaret Cash keeping a horse at or Justin Trudeau's faux pas, for example, you're a right winger automatically to some on here. The shades of grey are slowly being eroded and it's nearly always pick a side.
Roger_007 wrote: » It's surely a sign of the times when an emotional outburst from a stroppy 16yo makes international news.
Wanderer78 wrote: » hes a fcuking scumbag
kevcos wrote: » Nah, legend.
Wanderer78 wrote: » really hes not, hes one of the most ignorant world leaders theres ever been, and thick to
Hande hoche! wrote: » too?