nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Gameweek 6 matchday thread

KevIRL

So proud

Wipes tear from eye

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Dr. Bre

29 with 6 left plus captain . What’s the chances of greenwood starting ?

COH

49 from 5

Salah (c), Robertson, VVD, Abraham, McGinn and Dendonker to go

ScummyMan

Absolutely sick as an Aguero captainer watching MOTD

This could easily have been a 100+ week

km79

ScummyMan wrote: »

Absolutely sick as an Aguero captainer watching MOTD

This could easily have been a 100+ week

Just came on to post the same
Add to that the KDB vc points and lundstrum and it just feels underwhelming now
and then there is salah to come.....

km79

Dr. Bre wrote: »

29 with 6 left plus captain . What’s the chances of greenwood starting ?

not pictured at team hotel.......

gammygils

13 - Capt Sterling. 7 to come off bench + 2 more from vc Vardy. 22 with VVD Salah Ceballos and hopefully Mount to play
If Mount doesn't play I have Douglas Luiz 3rd sub
I'm not in a good place now :rolleyes: Red Arrow #5 beckons

km79

Assist rant.........
And a caveat I have otamendi and not Vardy

How on earth was Vardys not an assist for perreira ?
He played the ball across the box and took a nick off a defender
There is no intended target he put it in around the danger area and perriera scored it

Are we really saying otamendis intended target was Silva and not the back of the net ?

I’m only pointing this out so I have credibility when I go on a real rant when I’m on the wrong end of it

It’s just silly now
Both are FF assists

sheroman01

km79 wrote: »

Assist rant.........
And a caveat I have otamendi and not Vardy

How on earth was Vardys not an assist for perreira ?
He played the ball across the box and took a nick off a defender
There is no intended target he put it in around the danger area and perriera scored it

Are we really saying otamendis intended target was Silva and not the back of the net ?

I’m only pointing this out so I have credibility when I go on a real rant when I’m on the wrong end of it

It’s just silly now
Both are FF assists

Vardys is at least consistent with FPLs ridiculous logic of "intended target" - Vardys intended target was directly acrosss goal. Pereira came from deep and only because of the deflection it makes its way into his path. I also think FPL don't like deflected crosses regardless of intended target.

Just saw Otamendis one now. They might argue he was trying to score? If not, then I agree with you, the "intended target" is such BS in this case.

km79

sheroman01 wrote: »

Vardys is at least consistent with FPLs ridiculous logic of "intended target" - Vardys intended target was directly acrosss goal. Pereira came from deep and only because of the deflection it makes its way into his path. I also think FPL don't like deflected crosses regardless of intended target.

Just saw Otamendis one now. They might argue he was trying to score? If not, then I agree with you, the "intended target" is such BS in this case.

Imo either both are assists or neither are

In other news
Great pass from Lundstrum for the goal
Again I benched him but I feel such odd pride for him doing well given the amount of sheff united fans who didn’t even want him to start
We showed them LOL

Also Everton are ****e

[Deleted User]

As someone who owned Ageuro pretty much all last season including through injuries (I might need to rethink this strategy)

He has starter as good if not better and last year you had to put uo with his minutes being managed which diesn't seem to be the case this year.

DeBryune at his best, which he seems back to is delivering balls into the area mainly just for kun.

As a sterling owner with possible Mendy attacking attributes being taking away soon ill have to switch.

Sterling is an amazing player but i can see City back to their fullness using him more as a ball progresser.

I argued for Aguero last season with limited minutes, if he continues to get more this year its a no brainer, especially with DeBryune playing how and where he is

MEGA BRO WOLF 5000

50 sees me jump too 3 in all my money leagues and took 400k overall.

Delighted.

Looptheloop30

Currently 150k OR
52 with 4 to play

Brought in and captained Aguero. Those who captained Sterling and have de Bruyne VC will break my heart later and send me back with a red arrow

TitianGerm

Sitting on 77 at the minute with Diop, Pepe and Abraham to go. Rico on the bench with 5 points if any of them don't feature.

Tipsy McSwagger

Greenwood not in United squad

siblers

km79 wrote: »

Assist rant.........
And a caveat I have otamendi and not Vardy

How on earth was Vardys not an assist for perreira ?
He played the ball across the box and took a nick off a defender
There is no intended target he put it in around the danger area and perriera scored it

Are we really saying otamendis intended target was Silva and not the back of the net ?

I’m only pointing this out so I have credibility when I go on a real rant when I’m on the wrong end of it

It’s just silly now
Both are FF assists

Like the goal given to Fraser last week which was a clear OG. Nonsense

bantee

Tipsy McSwagger wrote: »

Greenwood not in United squad

Sweet, Lundstram coming off my bench so

Sawduck

Sawduck wrote: »

44 with 4 left, but dunk should add extra 5 when he comes on for sterling

50 now with dunk adding another 6 when he replaces sterling, I'm just hoping mane has a quiet match now

Markx

21 yesterday - abysmal. Chelsea 0 Liverpool 8 should see me good though. Be grand.

km79

bantee wrote: »

Sweet, Lundstram coming off my bench so

Not confirmed

Father Hernandez

Martin Kelly on the bench

Please please please God, don't let him come on

extra gravy

Lanzini not in squad, 6 from Montoya to come in for me. Happy enough with that.

COH

If ever there was a time for a Dendonker hatty this is it .... my Sterling replacent :pac:

ScummyMan

Lanzini not in the squad means Lundstram comes in for me, what a lucky break

normanoffside

Greenwood not on the bench

dsmythy

Saw Lanzini out so figured grand, James unlikely too so will get Lundstram on. Alas. If he doesn't score he's doomed for this error.

siblers

Need Kelly to not play and Mount not to play so Lundstrum can come in. There's a chance

Scorpion Sting

West Ham: Fabiański, Fredericks, Diop, Ogbonna, Cresswell, Noble, Rice, Yarmolenko, Fornals, Anderson, Haller

Subs: Roberto, Zabaleta, Balbuena, Sánchez, Wilshere, Snodgrass, Ajeti

Manchester United: De Gea, Wan-Bissaka, Maguire, Lindelöf, Young, Matić, McTominay, Pereira, Mata, James, Rashford

Subs: Romero, Tuanzebe, Rojo, Fred, Gomes, Lingard, Chong

Crystal Palace: Guaita, Ward, Cahill, Sakho, Van Aanholt, Milivojević, Kouyaté, McArthur, Schlupp, Ayew, Zaha

Subs: Hennessey, Kelly, Dann, McCarthy, Meyer, Townsend, Benteke

Wolves: Patrício, Boly, Coady, Saïss, Doherty, Moutinho, Dendoncker, Jonny, Traoré, Jiménez, Jota

Subs: Ruddy, Vallejo, Vinagre, Neves, Gibbs-White, Neto, Cutrone

scotchy

siblers wrote: »

Need Kelly to not play and Mount not to play so Lundstrum can come in. There's a chance

Exact same here.

.

km79

Need kelly to play

SteelyDanJalapeno

Ned Kelly is all I see