Tell me how wrote: » I think the reason the poster mentioned about what happened in Tallaght is because it was only tweeted out today. Every action could be said to impact on the environment but that is not to say that they are ultimately invalid or pointless or even hypocritical. Yes there is destructive work involved in raising wind turbines, but ultimately the damage is much less than not doing so. That makes it a worthwhile exercise.
ForestFire wrote: I believe We need to go nuclear and the world/givernments/central banks/imf should agree to fund it (print there imaginary money), with 0% interest and 1000 year payback, World wide for every country to switch. If not nuclear they should agree to fund any other "green" energy, so its not a drain on countries debts.
Rockbeast2 wrote: Finally, someone says "nuclear".
Rockbeast2 wrote: » Finally, someone says "nuclear". We can easily stick three on East coast/Irish sea Wexford/North Dublin County/ Just after Meath
Rockbeast2 wrote: "Unfortunately it is written into our constitution to ban nuclear. It takes decades to bring one of these online."
Damien360 wrote: » Rockbeast2 wrote: » Finally, someone says "nuclear". We can easily stick three on East coast/Irish sea Wexford/North Dublin County/ Just after Meath Unfortunately it is written into our constitution to ban nuclear. It takes decades to bring one of these online.
Rockbeast2 wrote: » * + if anything goes wrong, the winds might send it to England! LOL
Rockbeast2 wrote: The paid shills all rocked off at 7pm.
Wanderer78 wrote: » I'm still here, on overtime, rates are great at the weekend
lola85 wrote: Thought you would be against more pay for over time been the avid socialist you are.
lola85 wrote: » Are we still pushing this farce? Ice ages, ice melting, earth cooling, earth warming has been happening for billions of years yet we still have people here telling us humans in the few years we exist are somehow to cause.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » You know it is not easy to find details of the science involved behind the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, but if you are a skeptic like me you need to get a basic grasp of the science involved. Once you have that you can present a case that makes the alarmists step back because they don't know the science either. Once you start digging into climate science you will quickly realise it is multi disciplinary, there is nobody who knows everything about the climate, but if you want to grasp why they are making a song and dance about CO2 then start with this presentation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oog7-KOtpEA There are terms used in the presentation that you may not be familiar with, don't worry about those stick with the presentation and if you are curious you can use google those terms afterwards. This will put you in the right direction and then the Connollys work will begin to make sense.
lola85 wrote: » Ever read about the affects the earths axis tilt has on temperatures?
vladmydad wrote: » This is no longer funny. #cult