Thelonious Monk wrote: » Vacuum left in our lives by religion lol. So what, all you rural folk are still devout Catholics?
Thelonious Monk wrote: The solution is lowering our standard of living. We cant continue as is, even if climate change is a hoax like you all say, the way we are living now means the earth will be depleted and polluted beyond repair sooner or later. Why is it so scary to every one that they may have to live with less choice of crap that we consume?
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » That's across the board, far less of the rural middle class are cheering on their own demise however. Climate change is a substitute for religion for many who are searching for meaning in their otherwise dull lives, it has many of the components of a religion and even some of the terminology. Dogma, a priest class, slogans, sins, prophets and saints, the works.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » The solution is lowering our standard of living. We cant continue as is, even if climate change is a hoax like you all say, the way we are living now means the earth will be depleted and polluted beyond repair sooner or later. Why is it so scary to every one that they may have to live with less choice of crap that we consume?
People must use less transport, eat less red meat and buy fewer clothes if the UK is to virtually halt greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, the government's chief environment scientist has warned. Prof Sir Ian Boyd said the public had little idea of the scale of the challenge from the so-called Net Zero emissions target.source
Sir Ian Boyd has lifted the lid on the reality of the programme. We will all have to accept big lifestyle changes – travel less, eat less, consume less. And forget about cheap imports from Asia, because these simply offshore emissions. As Sir Ian points out, this is likely to mean much higher taxes on sinful consumption. Of course, this won’t matter to Elton John and co, who can afford to pay for their indulgences.But eventually some form of compulsion or rationing will be necessary, if climate targets are to be met.
In its report, the committee said: “In the long-term, widespread personal vehicle ownership does not appear to be compatible with significant decarbonisation.”source
During the event, which itself was widely criticized for sexist and patronizing undertones, an audience member asked Mr. Trudeau which nation’s “administration he most admired.” The party leader responded: “There is a level of admiration I actually have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and say we need to go green, we need to start, you know, investing in solar. There is a flexibility that I know Stephen Harper must dream about: having a dictatorship where you can do whatever you wanted, that I find quite interesting.” Noting he was on camera, Mr. Trudeau then said: “But Sun News can now report that I prefer China.”source
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Rural folk who still go to mass despite all the paedo and oppression stuff are less likely to believe science or use common sense regarding how we are treating the earth. Who'd have thunk it. At least this climate change religion isnt based on make believe like yours.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Conservative newspaper slates 'socialist' movement, boring!
Dave_The_Sheep wrote: » Opinions, however, are not facts. Climate change doesn't give a **** about your opinion. Scientists deal in facts. The scientific consensus* is overwhelmingly (97-98%) in favoure of the fact that climate change is man-made.
By the 1920s, eugenics was a genuine movement. As author and pediatrician Paul Offit describes in his new book, Pandora's Lab, Hundreds of colleges taught courses on the subject. It appeared in the majority of high school biology textbooks. There were fairs, meetings, and advertisements. The nationwide campaign convinced citizens and legislatures – forty-one states eventually prohibited marriage by those deemed feeble-minded or insane, and a few states even instituted policies of forced sterilization.source
Fan of Netflix wrote: » https://twitter.com/alx/status/1174758954125201408 Your leader in Antifa attire
Pa ElGrande wrote: » Ignore Greta, she is an innocent pawn in this and is being endorsed by adults exploiting her to facilitate their business models.
Fan of Netflix wrote: » Exploiting children is what the libtards do best
Pa ElGrande wrote: » All politicians across the spectrum do that when it suits them because nobody is going to attack children, it makes your opponent look like monsters. Important to note that Greta is a young adult (16 years) being presented as a much younger child. This is quite deliberate image manipulation by the organisation around her. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RybNI0KB1bg
Fan of Netflix wrote: » Your leader in Antifa attire
Thelonious Monk wrote: » libtards, lol. This is like right wing bingo. Why are you offended that she's wearing an anti-fascism t shirt?
Wanderer78 wrote: » my leader!
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Jimmy Garlic wrote: » That's across the board, far less of the rural middle class are cheering on their own demise however. Climate change is a substitute for religion for many who are searching for meaning in their otherwise dull lives, it has many of the components of a religion and even some of the terminology. Dogma, a priest class, slogans, sins, prophets and saints, the works. Rural folk who still go to mass despite all the paedo and oppression stuff are less likely to believe science or use common sense regarding how we are treating the earth. Who'd have thunk it. At least this climate change religion isnt based on make believe like yours.
joe40 wrote: » NASA, Royal Society of Chemistry, United Nations, countless universities and professors worldwide,(including Irish) all part of a massive global propaganda campaign. Sure what would they know.
weldoninhio wrote: » They know where their grant money is coming from.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » That report is just a series of projections (they no longer use predictions) in case the temperatures rose by 1.5C. Was there no climate before 1950? why ever did they pick that year as a starting point?
Tell me how wrote: » Really? What evidence is there that this is what they want to happen? Evidence now please, not a strawman argument.
weldoninhio wrote: » In medieval times the average temp was 2c higher than nowadays. Wasn’t catastrophic for those people.
