Harika wrote: » Got a take away yesterday too from there, it was so bland , even the rice. Tasted the kids stuff and that was even less tasty. Would not recommend
pwurple wrote: » tks. Looks like perception difference / expecting something fancy when you order a roast chicken. You had a main dish, which was good. Side you didn't like, and the dessert was also good. Sounds like the majority of your meal was good, no? I ordered different stuff I guess... I wouldn't expect anything but a fairly boring roast chicken from ordering it tbh... but was impressed with the meat I ordered, because you can't get porchetta or that whole sirloin anywhere else (as far as I know! Happy to be corrected!). Those choices are fairly far from average. Roast chicken I can do at home, I imagine it's only on the menu for the fussy eaters, so wouldn't ever order it out and expect much more than fairly plain food. So, I guess I think it's a little unfair to give them a slating review based on a roast chicken being a roast chicken, especially when that's the only main you tried there ever. You're right of course, they should be consistent. Thinking back, I didn't like the Burnt Ends or whatever they were, too greasy for me. But I hadn't had them before, so was a risk. Your gratin should have been better than dry.
Debub wrote: » talking about Ramen - have never dined in. but did get takeaway 5 times. The first time, we thought that food was good, second tome no so good, the next 3 times we got the same dish - again first time was ok, the next 2 times - despite being the same dish - it tasted different - so the same dish tasted different the 3 times that we got and didn't taste great - so we kinda stopped getting food from them. All of the above from the Dennehy's Cross outlet.
fin12 wrote: » Is the sago restaurant near the college of Commerce closed?
Nigel Fairservice wrote: » Yes.
fin12 wrote: » Is sabo in black pool a different restaurant? Why are the names so similar? There’s loads of Asian restaurants down the lane opposite tesco on Paul’s street?
sporina wrote: » yeah we really only ate there because we were in the Anglesea Street area.. and needed something fast-ish... Bring back Banna Thai/Chilli Padi/Sago
rob316 wrote: » You got to get the simple things right, I didn't expect anything fancy but they managed to make the whole main tasteless. That's why somewhere like market lane leaves this in the dust. A roast chicken dinner in a restaurant with the hype like spitjack should be delivered perfectly at a minimum.
Lia_lia wrote: » Anyone tried Goldie yet? New seafood place from the Market Lane crowd. I can’t wait to try it. Cork needed another seafood pla(i)ce!
leahyl wrote: » Spitjack is overrated alright - I’ve never been particularly wowed when I was there, been there 4 times now - one time for dinner, once for lunch, and twice for brunch. The lunch was nice but the other times there was something missing each time or it just wasn’t as nice as somewhere like Liberty Grill which, in my opinion, still does the best eggs Benedict in the city
the beer revolu wrote: » I've only been there once for brunch and to be honest, I don't recall what the food was like (presumably it was fine, if I don't remember). What I do recall, though, was the really loud contemporary, mainstream pop music blaring from the speaker above my head. While they did, eventually, turn it down, I have zero interest in returning on the off chance that the same situation would occur.
whatever76 wrote: » yes was there over weekend ! Food and service top notch … Market Lane guys know how to run a good ship . Great addition to the city
the beer revolu wrote: » I've only been there once for brunch and to be honest, I don't recall what the food was like (presumably it was fine, if I don't remember). What I do recall, though, was the really loud contemporary, mainstream pop music blaring from the speaker above my head. While they did, eventually, turn it down, I have zero interest in returning on the off chance that the same situation would occur. I get that some restaurants are aimed at a very young demographic (Son of a Bun, Cock Bull, Luigi Malone's) and perhaps loud music is appreciated (I'd have hated the music choice when I was that age, anyway) but surely Spitjack isn't going for that young, inexpensive, casual, cool vibe?? I would have thought that it wanted to attract a more mature audience.
leahyl wrote: » The music can be ridiculously loud in Coqbull, especailly if you're seated near one of the speakers, and its not like I'm old but even I can't take it :pac:
RINO87 wrote: » Managements line was "If they're chatting, they're not drinking". I wonder is the same beginning to apply to restaurants.... Get them in, get their money, get them out. ASAP.
RINO87 wrote: » Hmmm, I used to work in one of the bigger pubs in Galway, once the place was any way busy the orders from management were to have the music deafening loud. It had to be to the point where people would struggle to hear each other. Managements line was "If they're chatting, they're not drinking". I wonder is the same beginning to apply to restaurants.... Get them in, get their money, get them out. ASAP.
CHealy wrote: » Thali on Popes Quay is a great little Nepalese restaurant, very very tasty but eat in, dont order takeaway.
rob316 wrote: » Logic seems stupid, if anything if they are chatting they're drinking.