ussjtrunks wrote: » I wonder how the bidder for the contract feels about all this faffing about
Grab All Association wrote: » https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/news/rollout-of-3bn-national-broadband-plan-delayed-yet-again-38498568.html Delayed again, thanks to Timmy O’Tool no doubt.
The Cush wrote: » Minister Richard Bruton on RTÉ's This Week programme at 1.00pm today, discussion includes the NBP.
celticbhoy27 wrote: » Didn't get to tune in. Any new info come from the interview?
We're determined to do this. And we will do it as quickly as possible
Messer1 wrote: » According to the Sunday Business Post, the NBP plans to roll out services to an initial 350 key strategic community points using WIRELESS! These will be progressively replaced by fibre.
Messer1 wrote: » According to the Sunday Business Post, the NBP plans to roll out services to an initial 350 key strategic community points using WIRELESS! These will be progressively replaced by fibre, presumably once the NBP has (expensively) rolled out its own fibre alongside eir's stuff. Meantime, SpaceX has indicated that it plans to launch 120-240 Starlink sats later this year and, all going well, will launch up to 1,400 next year depending on demand for its rideshare service which will charge at $5k per kg.
KOR101 wrote: » Nice to see the word fibre firmly stated. Rural Ireland "does not have a future in the 21st century" unless fibre broadband is delivered to every home, Taoiseach Leo Varadkar has warned. In an exclusive interview with the Irish Independent, the Taoiseach insisted that the Government was right to push ahead with the controversial National Broadband Plan.https://www.independent.ie/business/farming/rural-life/no-future-for-rural-ireland-without-fibre-broadband-taoiseach-38505221.html
Mr Varadkar said the Government was determined to get fibre on poles next year.
Nyum Nyum wrote: » This is never going to happen, is it?
celticbhoy27 wrote: » Is it the 20th that is the cut off for commercial operators to submit offers to supply areas in the nbp zone? Thankfully doesn't look like any are making an application. Had been murmurings imagine would.
Rivals say they are unable to connect customers to company’s new fibre network A row has broken out in the telecoms industry over the quality of Eir’s new fibre broadband network to 300,000 rural households which were formerly part of the State-backed National Broadband Plan (NBP). … Despite Eir’s claims that it has successfully completed the project, passing the 300,000 homes with its fibre product, non-Eir operators using the network claim there are insufficient “dropping points” to connect prospective customers. They also claim that “fail rates” on the network where operators try to connect customers but fail are as high as 12 per cent. Their grievances were aired at Eir’s own industry product forum on Wednesday, according to industry sources.
Eir denied there was an issue with the rollout of fibre to 300,000 homes. “Open Eir [the company’s wholesale arm] has not to date encountered a significant issue with the availability of drop points within the 300,000,” a spokesman said. A spokesperson for the Department of Communications was not available.
Emmanuel Lemon Louse wrote: » Shots fired! "234,092 amber premises covered" apparently.https://www.imagine.ie
KOR101 wrote: » All quiet on the western front.....
A number of submissions have been received from small operators requesting a further extension to enable the finalisation of submissions currently under preparation and the Department has decided to grant a further extension...
Emmanuel Lemon Louse wrote: » Deadline extended again. Now set for the 30th of September. Timelines are certainly not their strong point.
celticbhoy27 wrote: » Bloody hell. Where you hearing this navi?
celticbhoy27 wrote: » Extending it again is a joke. It might be only 10 days but its ten days towards another delay to analyse whatever pish these wireless submit
celticbhoy27 wrote: » Bloody hell. Where you hearing this navi? Deadline is a deadline if the clowns who are making submissions can't abide by them that's there problem. They got enough notice. Extending it again is a joke. It might be only 10 days but its ten days towards another delay to analyse whatever pish these wireless submit
KOR101 wrote: » But what is the point of a submission? The intervention map only changes if a committment contract is agreed and signed.
Emmanuel Lemon Louse wrote: » Not if they are claiming pre-existing coverage, which they likely are.
KOR101 wrote: » Does the same criteria that applies for a commitment contract also apply for a claim of pre-existing coveerage? I don't see that the intervention map changes unless the criteria are met, and I don't see how the small wireless operators can do that.