kksaints wrote: » He's actually the second Thai driver in F1. B Bira drove for 5 seasons in the 1950s.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birabongse_Bhanudej
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Just by pure coincidence I got a message this second from a friend on holidays in Bangkok. He said the trains are covered in Albon advertisements so it can’t hurt to be a big advertisement figure in Thailand.
pjohnson wrote: » Albon was British when he was at Lotus academy irrc.
Deleted User wrote: » Nope.
mickdw wrote: » ?
Cork Trucker wrote: » El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Yes. There are also 2 Finns 2 Germans and 2 French.I think the British would claim Albon if he were on the podium with 2 Brits. And they’d call it a French podium if LeClerc was there with Ro-Gro and Gasley. Almost certainly, Thai flag though.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Yes. There are also 2 Finns 2 Germans and 2 French.I think the British would claim Albon if he were on the podium with 2 Brits. And they’d call it a French podium if LeClerc was there with Ro-Gro and Gasley.
PopePalpatine wrote: » Like that'd stop David Croft & co.
Cork Trucker wrote: » Probably for historical reasons, first Thai racer in F1 and that, something he can never have taken from him so a place in F1's history books. Did he race under the UK flag earlier in his career? i know Nico Rosberg despite being born in Germany and growing up in Monaco raced under the Finnish flag earlier in his career despite admitting he can't speak Finnish fluently, possibly Keke never conversed in the language with him very often as a child.
uchimata83 wrote: » You mean Crofty? Love Sky's coverage, reminds me of the early morning football show on BT with Fletch and Sav. I just hope they can dumb things down for us more in the future
skipper_G wrote: » As far as I know he raced his first season of open wheelers under a British flag and then switched to Thai. He was definitely using Thai in his F3 campaign
Deleted User wrote: » I should have elaborated rather than just snark. :pac: Right now the suspensions are rigid as **** since the tyres allow flex. Running such hard suspensions (which are great for aero) won't be feasible so teams are going to have to come up with adaptable solutions. With the rules as they are they're not allowed movable parts and I think tuned mass dampers are still illegal. While obviously the big teams can invest more it at least allows for changes and innovation on something other than aero which is pretty rare. A team could come up with a solution that'll move them into the midfield or challenge for podiums at certain tracks.
flazio wrote: » I think Williams have a good chance of getting out of this slump they are in now. This engine deal should help.https://twitter.com/WilliamsRacing/status/1172454717705850880?s=19
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » flazio wrote: » I think Williams have a good chance of getting out of this slump they are in now. This engine deal should help.https://twitter.com/WilliamsRacing/status/1172454717705850880?s=19 Depends. If those engines cost a fortune then they might be better off with cheaper engines and putting the money into solving the problems. The engine is not the problem and they’re still 2-3 seconds off the pace. But generally it’s good for them to have a solid engine deal. It might suit them to give Mercedes an option on a seat in exchange for money off the engine. If the car wasn’t a mess this year, they could have had Ocon next year which would be a good solution for everyone involved. But the car is so bad that it wasn’t even discussed.
Faugheen wrote: » I imagine there is a seat option in there in exchange for money off. It suits all parties to have that. I imagine Russell stays there again next year. Hopefully there’s some progress and they can at least be competitive so Russell can really show everyone what he’s capable of.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Faugheen wrote: » I imagine there is a seat option in there in exchange for money off. It suits all parties to have that. I imagine Russell stays there again next year. Hopefully there’s some progress and they can at least be competitive so Russell can really show everyone what he’s capable of. I hope so too. I'm reluctant to get carried away with Russel yet. He looks good and I hope he's the real deal but we have very little data to compare him. At the moment we have his car which is crap but we don't know exactly how crap and we have Kubica who is not firing on all cylinders either. So Russell is doing a grand job of keeping the car on track and being consistent but that's about all we can say. We haven't seen him battle for position much because he is so far ahead of kubica and so far behind everyone else. He seems like a good bloke which I think skews opinions of his driving -human nature to do so.
Faugheen wrote: » In fairness when the Williams looked in some way competitive he just missed out on Q2 by less than a tenth so there is a good driver there. However like you said, we just don’t know how good.
astrofluff wrote: » There should be a decent team mate battle next year between Russell and Latifi, should Latifi get the drive. I think Russell is a touch better than Latifi, and with a year's experience more, Russell should be setting the bar nice and high in the Williams. Let's hope Williams are able to contest the midfield next year too (that'll make more interesting to watch).
recyclebin wrote: » t. Talent is only third.