Stan27 wrote: » North bound in traffic, I dont see a major difference. Southbound, defo an improvement. Would be cool to have the proposed road for naas Town to be built, and a 3rd lane from the split to maybe kildare Laois boarder (southbound). Though public transport is really needed. Dublin needs to be sorted first as there is no point some one from naas getting a train for examplebut can't get to ballycoolin industrial estate.
road_high wrote: » I wish they’d finish the damn thing by now. Southbound was down to 2 lanes this morning with very little going on. Just get on with it
Last Stop wrote: » You’re a member since 2006, you should know by now this is a discussion forum not a wishing well! Posting the same thing every 2 days isn’t going to speed things up.
road_high wrote: » Go way I assumed the contractor was reading this religiously and basing their work around it? It’s wonderful we have you around to tell us otherwise !
_Kaiser_ wrote: » Listening to the radio here as I get ready and traffic reports saying there's already tailbacks inbound to exit 7. Maybe they should have just worked on the outbound stretch.
Odyssey 2005 wrote: » That would only make sence. Total waste of money and effort with the inbound works. .
Tomrota wrote: » Public transport in Kildare is reserved for Maynooth and Celbridge.
Darc19 wrote: » People using the M7 work in Naas and Newbridge too. Also, how many minor accidents have there been on the northbound section from M9 to Naas north since 3 lanes opened. Answer = 0 How many were there last Aug / Sept? Answer = probably one every week. People seem to have short memories of the mega delays caused by minor shunts on the M7
jmkennedyie wrote: » They are the beams on the Osberstown overbridge. No beams on the canal bridge yet as of last weekend anyways (pier pics above). There was no budge yet on new roundabout Clane end or tie in road into Sallins visible. So I'd be surprised if Sallins bypass completed within 3 months. More like Feb or March or later. They could stage opening Sallins then Clane but probably not worth the hassle.
emfifty wrote: » There won't be any roundabout built on the Clane side of bypass. Unresolved KCC/landowner dispute.
road_high wrote: » So that’ll be just a stop sign junction ? Recipe for disaster I’d say. Looks to be lots of space there
Odyssey 2005 wrote: » That would only make sence. Total waste of money and effort with the inbound works. The M50 couldn't handle the volume of traffic that was going onto it. It certainly wont be able to handle the volume now.
BuzzFish wrote: » What's the source of this? Seems strange. At the very least they could place the roundabout just inside bypass site exit and reallign the main road to join it. Assuming the land dispute could only be on the opposite side of the road to the bypass exit??
road_high wrote: » Far as i can see the 4 track rail line into Heuston is totally underused still as regards services. Every time i get the train all i see is empty lines and empty platforms on that section
emfifty wrote: I'm sure KCC could do whatever they wished if they had some creative solutions. Wouldn't hold by breath for a 'creative solution' from KCC though. They might need to make some changes to the original bypass contract though me thinks it's possibly too late as the road alignment is more or less complete bar the asphalt.
jmkennedyie wrote: » BTW there was a specific CPO issued for that roundabout...http://www.kildare.ie/CountyCouncil/PressReleasesAdverts/PressReleasesAdverts2018/October/M7R407CPOOctober2018.html