Odelay wrote: » Interesting link and thanks for adding it. But the state of those machines is shocking. How the fook are they so bad after 1-3k hours work?
Reggie. wrote: » This was a while ago. Dont like them 90 deg fold up mowers since
vincenzolorenzo wrote: » Your new mower folds up by more than 90 degrees doesn't it? What's different in the design to stop the headstock breaking? Still a big weight its carrying isn't it?
Limestone Cowboy wrote: » Came across this the other day. Too cheap to resist....:rolleyes:
Reggie. wrote: » You'll never get it onto the front of the NH
Jb1989 wrote: » Is that poor haybob heading down under
bogman_bass wrote: » What’s the plan for it?
Limestone Cowboy wrote: » Building walls mostly. I have a lot of very big stones.
Buford T. Justice VI wrote: » Self praise is no praise:p
Odelay wrote: » A grab is an awful handy attachment to have. Don’t know why excavators don’t have them, they are very popular in the states.
Panjandrums wrote: » Do the OPW ever have auctions? I remember seeing a new 35tonne Kobelco excavator a few months back and thinking that would be a great buy in a few years for someone.
bogman_bass wrote: » Do you mean by tender?
Buford T. Justice VI wrote: » Last of the big spenders, me. Been looking for one of those for a while now as it was getting awkward removing pallets from deliveries with the bale handler. Finally found a lad not too far away making them.
Panch18 wrote: » Need that exact same implement myself What kind of pallet weight can they take? Is it from scully trailers?
Buford T. Justice VI wrote: » Rated for 2 tonnes, from a man around Listowel side. My loader isn't rated for more than a tonne so I won't be testing it too much in the near future. They're fairly scarce but got them for E450 so happy with that. Any new ones I priced seem around E7-800.
satstheway wrote: » Do you find it hard to get under pallets. Like hard to see?
