Man Vs ManUre wrote: » If your face was being squeezed so hard that your jaw would eventually crush or maybe even worse, what is the problem with tapping out?
rob316 wrote: » I heard from a friend who knew someone in that camp that basically he turned up in terrible shape and spent most of it detoxing.
Effects wrote: » There's no problem with tapping out. The point was Barboza was able to get to the end of the fight without getting himself in a position where he had to tap out.
AlmightyCushion wrote: » The Barboza fight was only 3 rounds so McGregor actually lasted longer than Barboza. Obviously things could have went differently if the barboza fight was a 5 rounder but you can't really criticise McGregor when he lasted longer than Barboza. Not to mention McGregor performed very well in the first and avoided taking any real shots and also won the third. Barboza got smashed for all three rounds.
JJayoo wrote: » I heard that McG lost both his legs on the morning of the fight and that's why he wasn't able to defend the takedowns. And his left arm was ran over by a herd of buffalo as he made his way to the cage so that's why he didn't knock Khabib out instantly in round one.
AlmightyCushion wrote: » The Barboza fight was only 3 rounds so McGregor actually lasted longer than Barboza.
eagle eye wrote: » I don't care about a Khabib/Conor rematch at all. He was fairly and squarely beaten. Nate Diaz deserves a rubber match, imo he didn't lose the second fight, personally I think a draw would have been a fair result. Love to see a third between them.
BigMo1 wrote: » It's been over 3 years since that fight and I still haven't heard an intelligible argument for a Nate win or a draw. Conor won 1,2 and 4 clear as day. Nate was knocked down twice in the second round so that could easily have been a 10-8 for McGregor, certainly more so than any other round in that fight.
BigMo1 wrote: » [L Conor won 1,2 and 4 clear as day. Nate was knocked down twice in the second round so that could easily have been a 10-8 for McGregor, certainly more so than any other round in that fight.
Mellor wrote: » It’s not boxing. Round 1 wasn’t close to a 10-8. And neither was any other round.
riffmongous wrote: » I do think it's about time to go through the Diaz fight again alright, then we can perhaps finally get a discussion going on the Mayweather fight
JJayoo wrote: » Have watched both fights multiple times and I honestly think McG won both fights with Nate.
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » The Khabib Conor fight has generated so much interest we are still discussing it passionately almost 1 year later.
Mellor wrote: » Effects wrote: » There's no problem with tapping out. The point was Barboza was able to get to the end of the fight without getting himself in a position where he had to tap out. Barboza was mauled more than any of Khabib’s recent opponents. Al did a better job of surviving. He’s not really a grappler to active chasing the submission. The way that Maia or Gunni would. If it presents, he’ll take it but he’s happy to strike from top position. I’m not sure what conclusions we can draw from one result verses the other.
Sweet.Science wrote: » Sure This actually happened and grown adults still think it was realhttps://twitter.com/SwearingSport/status/1166047028234862592
spix wrote: » I don't understand the point of this gif, what are people trying to imply when they post it? Its ALMOST as pointless as the its only business quote from the khabib fight. Want a gif of all the jabs mcgregor actually landed clean? Or the time Mayweather grabbed mcgregors ass to clinch in round 7 after 2 bodyshots that froze him. Or if you prefer missing gifs, I can make several of mayweather missing punches by a mile.
Sweet.Science wrote: » He doesnt love you back
US2 wrote: » Diaz an masvidal to headline 244. I thought non title fights couldn't headline ?