AlmightyCushion wrote: » The Barboza fight was only 3 rounds so McGregor actually lasted longer than Barboza.
JJayoo wrote: » I heard that McG lost both his legs on the morning of the fight and that's why he wasn't able to defend the takedowns. And his left arm was ran over by a herd of buffalo as he made his way to the cage so that's why he didn't knock Khabib out instantly in round one.
AlmightyCushion wrote: » The Barboza fight was only 3 rounds so McGregor actually lasted longer than Barboza. Obviously things could have went differently if the barboza fight was a 5 rounder but you can't really criticise McGregor when he lasted longer than Barboza. Not to mention McGregor performed very well in the first and avoided taking any real shots and also won the third. Barboza got smashed for all three rounds.
Effects wrote: » There's no problem with tapping out. The point was Barboza was able to get to the end of the fight without getting himself in a position where he had to tap out.
rob316 wrote: » I heard from a friend who knew someone in that camp that basically he turned up in terrible shape and spent most of it detoxing.
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » If your face was being squeezed so hard that your jaw would eventually crush or maybe even worse, what is the problem with tapping out?
Man Vs ManUre wrote: » Assuming it was real Proper 12 in the bottle, even drinking couple of shots at the pressers in week leading up to the fight cannot be the right preparation. It’s as if Conor was so confident of winning he thought he still would with this wild man rockstar behavior. I know he has spoken a few times about how he only drinks spirits as it does minimal damage for athletic performance compared to beer, but still surely you would perform better without the spirits also, even if just for the duration of the camp.
pastorbarrett wrote: » Purely speculative, but even his physique looked markedly different from the Eddie/ Mayweather fights. Maybe something to do with the cut? He looked drawn before the fight began, not out of shape by any means, but almost like he didn't rehydrate fully. And no, I don't think it would've changed the course of the fight.
Effects wrote: » Because people don't care as much about Barbosa getting beaten than they do about McGregor. And he lasted the whole fight rather than tapping out.
derfderf wrote: » Barbosa was smashed from bell to bell almost, and nobody gives him grief for it.
AlmightyCushion wrote: » He tried walking him down in the first round and it didn't work. I think he should have done what he does best, keep his distance, wait for Khabib to come at him and then hit Khabib on the way in. Walking Khabib down was just making it easier for Khabib to land the takedown as he had less distance to bridge and less time for McGregor to react and land something.
Tazzimus wrote: » An option would be to go on the attack immediately and try hurt him as fast as he could, punish him for trying to go for a takedown so he becomes hesitant. Only problem with that is if he gets caught at any stage, he's on the ground.
AbusesToilets wrote: » If I was a theoretical Conor, I guess the best strategy could hope for is working to maximize energy conservation through rounds 1 and 2 and hope for a third round , similar to this fight, where he would have more energy to put power behind his punches.
yourdeadwright wrote: » derfderf wrote: » I think Khabib would have been a bit worried after the first round. Barbosa was smashed from bell to bell almost, and nobody gives him grief for it. Conor shut Khabib down in round 1 as good as anyone I've seen, but he's called a sham. The first two rounds are always Conor's best though. Even though the defense in round one was impressive, his chance to win was gone by round three. He had nothing in his strikes. Conor won round 3 ?
derfderf wrote: » I think Khabib would have been a bit worried after the first round. Barbosa was smashed from bell to bell almost, and nobody gives him grief for it. Conor shut Khabib down in round 1 as good as anyone I've seen, but he's called a sham. The first two rounds are always Conor's best though. Even though the defense in round one was impressive, his chance to win was gone by round three. He had nothing in his strikes.
Deleted User wrote: » After the first Nate loss you got the sense that the result could be different with some gameplan & cardio tweaks. I didn't get that sense after the Khabib loss. Whether his coaches gave him a bad strategy, whether he success in the third round or "didn't do as bad" on the ground as some think etc is largely academic. I don't see any area where he can get a little bit better and it turns the fight around. He would need to do some major, major improvements, evolution, skill acquisition for me to think it would go any other way. Do I believe he is capable of doing that? No I don't. He has had periods of rapid evolution and skill acquisition in the past but those days are long behind him. He's been pissing around for years, rarely training outside of scheduled camps, hanging around with bad crowds, getting into trouble. There's no logic reason for me to think he would do better in a rematch. If fouls were dealt with properly I can see him doing worse.
Effects wrote: » Of course he will. He’s sorted out his cutting issues.
The Mig wrote: » Will he turn up Saturday?