Greta and the aristocrat sail the high seas to save the planet.

hetuzozaho wrote: »

Maybe you responded to wrong person?

Maybe I did .

Skylinehead

99problems1 wrote: »

To be fair, taking a yacht across the atlantic (where those operating it are getting a flight back) in the name of 0 emissions etc and still using a phone/laptops manufactured in asia would make her one anyways.

Once again:

Thelonious Monk

99problems1 wrote: »

To be fair, taking a yacht across the atlantic (where those operating it are getting a flight back) in the name of 0 emissions etc and still using a phone/laptops manufactured in asia would make her one anyways.

I know yeah youve all totally found her out. Well done. Legends.

Thelonious Monk wrote: »

And if she lived in a cave and shunned all the trappings of modern society youd all call her a freak. How long are you guys going to keep this thread going patting yourselves on the back for outwitting a 16 year old girl?

To be fair, taking a yacht across the atlantic (where those operating it are getting a flight back) in the name of 0 emissions etc and still using a phone/laptops manufactured in asia would make her one anyways.

hetuzozaho

blinding wrote: »

The yacht was made by rubbing a few sticks together:eek:

:

Maybe you responded to wrong person?

WOW, That fella would have been perfect for the trip. Why not bring him along

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKY7q-DVRs8

Stevieluvsye wrote: »

Ye it was brought up previously in this thread. She is a proven hypocrite who lives in her own world.

You are just arguing she is not hard core enough. If you want to see what the dark green end of the spectrum looks like meet Pentti Linkola.

hetuzozaho wrote: »

I've actually been looking at those solar panels for camping - they are cool aren't they. I'm addicted to my devices

You're right though the power on the yacht was from the sun I think from what I read.

The yacht was made by rubbing a few sticks together:eek:

Between this mob and the private jet mob they are doing a marvellous un-intentional job of undermine the Green Bull**** .

With friends like these the Greens / etc don’t need no enemies :eek:

hetuzozaho

Stevieluvsye wrote: »

It's one of them magic phones that the sun charges

I've actually been looking at those solar panels for camping - they are cool aren't they. I'm addicted to my devices

You're right though the power on the yacht was from the sun I think from what I read.

Thelonious Monk

And if she lived in a cave and shunned all the trappings of modern society youd all call her a freak. How long are you guys going to keep this thread going patting yourselves on the back for outwitting a 16 year old girl?

It's one of them magic phones that the sun charges and doesn't require any battery

hetuzozaho

99problems1 wrote: »

How does Greta use twitter?

Is her phone or PC not made in China?

I think 50% of Samsungs are now manufactured in Vietnam - so it's possible

99problems1 wrote: »

How does Greta use twitter?

Is her phone or PC not made in China?

Ye it was brought up previously in this thread. She is a proven hypocrite who lives in her own world.

I'll probably get shot down for that because she has autism

blinding wrote: »

They won’t mind piling on the Green taxes mind .

Politicians love taxes especially taxes that can be justified by the Greens waffle .

As I've said before climate change is just a vehicle of convenience to which several disparate groups have attached themselves.

I like to colour the people involved along a spectrum of green. On the dark green end of the spectrum you have the neo-maltusians, neo-eugenicists and others who see humans as parasites on earth and want the human population reduced of course they see themselves are enlightened and not subject to their own ideology.

The middle of the spectrum who rally under the moniker "climate justice" see international socialism under the auspices of the UN and income redistribution with power in their hands as members of the enlightened class , to the light green end of the spectrum that just wants a nice clean safe environment without doing anything but virtue signalling as observed by the late George Carlin " [..] environmentalists don’t give a **** about the planet. Not in the abstract they don’t. You know what they’re interested in? A clean place to live. Their own habitat. They’re worried that some day in the future they might be personally inconvenienced. Narrow, unenlightened self-interest doesn’t impress me.".

There is the dollar green part of the spectrum under "climate finance" whose only real concern is financial, the cause is just a convenient vehicle for them, watch them they go around the world in private jets while telling us plebeians to use public transport and bicycles, while they finagle the system to optimise the tax they pay while lobbying for more tax payer funded dollars.

There are the ideologically pure people like Greta who get sucked into this, they are the useful idiots to the people across the spectrum I have outlined above. They are not doing anything evil and some of them may actually be able to improve the environment for themselves and others and good luck to them.

CAGW is politicised science, it always will be a rent seekers paradise.

Stevieluvsye wrote: »

Thanks for that.

Barrier reef was the example i was thinking of when watching docs that showed dead coral. It was blamed on the usual suspect but then i thought could it be that coral have natural life expectency or something else.

I might tweet greta and ask her anyway for assurance

How does Greta use twitter?

Is her phone or PC not made in China?

Thanks for that.

Barrier reef was the example i was thinking of when watching docs that showed dead coral. It was blamed on the usual suspect but then i thought could it be that coral have natural life expectency or something else.

I might tweet greta and ask her anyway for assurance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0SA0Da6SoU

Stevieluvsye wrote: »

Papa grande, you seem to fairly well informed on all this

You any idea why corals are suffering so much around the world or is that all horse**** too?

The problem with catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) hypothesis is the propaganda is so pervasive that you mostly get to read or see anything that complies with the eco-catastrophism narrative so any natural event gets tied in with Climate change (except when it is cold then it's just weather). This is the case with the coral reef in Australia which is not being harmed by CAGW and you can read up on the case of Peter Ridd who was sacked for not towing the line on the health of the great barrier reef corals. He won his case in court, it does highlight how much pressure researchers are under to comply and they must suppress information that contradicts the narrative, which is why there are so few scientists willing to risk their livelihoods.

That's not to say there is not a problem affecting some corrals like in Thailand where the corals in some parts have been destroyed by pollution caused by tourism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78xdMXOx7Rw

Thelonious Monk

Ulysses Gaze wrote: »

Because it will end up with Governments doing only one thing - implementing another useless climate tax that we have to pay.

It will not solve the problem or even lead us down a path to really dealing with the problem.

Well that's our governments fault isn't it? We live in a democracy, you can vote for who you think will do a better job.

Ulysses Gaze

Thelonious Monk wrote: »

I agree, we are too greedy to change. I just don't understand why anyone trying to fight against the current tide is ridiculed so much. They're not harming anyone are they? Greta etc.

Because it will end up with Governments doing only one thing - implementing another useless climate tax that we have to pay.

It will not solve the problem or even lead us down a path to really dealing with the problem.

Pa ElGrande wrote: »

Greta is the victim in this. She simply parrots the narrative she has been given so they have no problem giving her airtime, it suits their corporate image as being "woke" while in parallel they discuss climate finance. The EU parliament did not allow her to speak because because “kids belong in schools” and likely they don't want the Greens or other socialist types gaining political traction on the back of that.

Yes. Those school protests are so condescending too.

"look at these kids caring about something".

It's akin to little Timmy putting a 5er into a moneybox and his grandparents telling him what a great boy he is and patting him on the head.

Pa ElGrande wrote: »

Greta is the victim in this. She simply parrots the narrative she has been given so they have no problem giving her airtime, it suits their corporate image as being "woke" while in parallel they discuss climate finance. The EU parliament did not allow her to speak because because “kids belong in schools” and likely they don't want the Greens or other socialist types gaining political traction on the back of that.

They won’t mind piling on the Green taxes mind .

Politicians love taxes especially taxes that can be justified by the Greens waffle .

Papa grande, you seem to fairly well informed on all this

You any idea why corals are suffering so much around the world or is that all horse**** too?

99problems1 wrote: »

And this is the kid we're all supposed to listen to...the kid governments and the EU have given air time to to speak about climate change etc.

Greta is the victim in this. She simply parrots the narrative she has been given so they have no problem giving her airtime, it suits their corporate image as being "woke" while in parallel they discuss climate finance. The EU parliament did not allow her to speak because because “kids belong in schools” and likely they don't want the Greens or other socialist types gaining political traction on the back of that.

Stevieluvsye wrote: »

Eeeek, edit your post. I got a warning yesterday

If they're not ok with the term they should give back their disability allowances then.

99problems1 wrote: »

Why did she take a photo of her smiling looking into new york?

Did she forget the planet is dying, the oceans rising, the icecaps melting, the trees burning.

The whole thing is a sham to make this kid feel important because she's disabled.

Pa ElGrande wrote: »

To be expected due to the complications she has experienced. She would be a difficult girl to live with in any family, so I suspect there is probably some relief that she has a cause to pursue that is not self destruction.

And this is the kid we're all supposed to listen to...the kid governments and the EU have given air time to to speak about climate change etc.

Why did she take a photo of her smiling looking into new york?

Did she forget the planet is dying, the oceans rising, the icecaps melting, the trees burning.

The whole thing is a sham to make this kid feel important because she's got a Aspergers.

jimgoose wrote: »

Apparently it was she who decided that Svante Thunberg's household would become vegan and give up air travel when she was nine or ten. I give up... :pac:

I expect the combination of parents careers and interests, doctors inability to diagnose her condition early on plus any medication she was one to regulate her behaviour all together caused a situation where there may not have been enough attention paid to her and her sister in their formative years which led to the children behaving that way in order to command attention. the only review I've seen of her mothers book is not positive on the situation either.