Stevieluvsye wrote: » So we are all in agreement now that it's all a publicity stunt being fronted by a mentally disabled teenager
ednwireland wrote: » see shes getting less coverage in the irish media (dropping down the order) press probably getting bored with the story now. mind you boris might have something to do with that and the fact that we are moving out of the silly season stories.
gozunda wrote: » Indeed. I think it's hilarious considering the UNs problem with basic figures and the photo detailing the17 boats sent out by them ... Just in case it gets deleted from Twitter - here it is for posterity.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Nah, it's about a new breed of climate change doubters (not deniers) who are pissed off with what they perceive as "hysteria" about climate change inserting their various views/narratives, with a few real deniers piggybacking. No issues, people are entitled to their opinions.All I say is thank god we didn't have the internet when the Ozone hysteria kicked off
Podge_irl wrote: » You mean the picture of the clearly numbered boats with boat number 17 right in your face in the picture? :rolleyes:Never mind counting, whoever thinks that is funny has issues with just recognising numbers.
gozunda wrote: » You really are late to the party Podge. But yes just because the number 17 appears - it does not follow that there are 17 boats in the photo now does it? Maybe you should go back to school as well The point is the photo is a good spoof on the UN feking up their figures once again. Dont get that? Cant help you Sorry.
Pa ElGrande wrote: » The acid rain scare (popular in the 1980s before the socialist regimes collapsed) The nuclear winter scare (popular in the 1980s) The global cooling scare (popular in the 1970s) The human population scare (popular in the 1970s
the ozone hole will still be there as big as ever as will the polar ice.
Podge_irl wrote: » Of course I get it. The point is that it is not a "good" anything, its incredibly stupid.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » The level of nastiness towards this girl is seriously shocking on this thread. Get a life you f*cking losers.
There are lots of questions we should ask and answer if we want to understand why the world has gone this terribly wrong. First, is Greta "real" or "fake"? Well, I find it more likely that she's "fake" and was "programmed" by somebody, most likely her dad (Svante Thunberg, an actor – who just happens to be a relative of Svante Arrhenius, a great chemist who has also written an influential paper about the greenhouse effect [and a eugenicist who planned to upgrade Swedish children by electric shocks]). For a while, she seemed to support nuclear energy. German eco-activists immediately attacked her, her dad joined, and she suddenly decided that she no longer likes nuclear energy.source
gozunda wrote: » Yes I quite agree - it was quite stupid stunt tbh. But ended up funny in the context of the UNs ability to spectacularly get the figures wrong on more than one occasion. But hey there we go ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
gozunda wrote: » You really are late to the party Podge. But yes just because the number 17 appears - it does not follow that there are 17 boats in the photo now does it? Maybe you should go back to school as well The point is the photo is a good spoof on the UN feking up their figures once again. Dont get that? Cant help you Sorry. Heres a photo of all 17 boats lined up waiting for the the main arrival
marieholmfan wrote: » Until proven otherwise this photo is fake news. If I say 'there are twenty people here' and you tweet a picture of five people that doesn't disprove my statement.Deniers lie.
Mr E wrote: » In a thread that started with lots of tongue-in-cheek remarks, it's another tongue-in-cheek remark. ....
Wanderer78 wrote: » she has autism, its a developmental disorder, shes not mentally disabled!
gozunda wrote: » Dohhjoe - pointing out the flaws in something does not make anyone a 'denier' a 'doubter' or even a witch in old money - god forbid. It doesn't even make them 'pissed off' (sic)
Imo the real concern lies with the reality of a populist climate movement allows absolutely no questioning of anything they say, no highlighting of evident extremism and absolutely no criticism of anything and especially the use of a figurehead child prophet. This is what is trurly deeply worrying about this current wave of hysteria.
Stevieluvsye wrote: » She's a dilusional, megalomanical, hyperbolic fruitcake with fantasist idea's.
Podge_irl wrote: » Claiming the UN can't count because they sent 17 boats out and you can only see 5 in a picture is a pretty spectacular analogy for someone saying Global Warming can't possibly exist cause it's cold outside.
Dohhjoe wrote: I Some denialists/doubters are motivated by simple base emotions toward environmentalists, the Jeremy Clarkson effect, where technically the environmentalist may be correct, but they are perceived as annoying/preachy, so a person takes the opposite position. Plenty of that goes inIt's an issue if they are using disinformation to make false or misleading claims
gozunda wrote: » Ah Podge still spectacularly late to the party I see. Lol. Didnt read the thread no? Didnt see the posts about the UN using incorrect data which was detailed no? Here's the link. Maybe best start from the beginning if you are going to be posting daft comments ok?https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=111111597&postcount=1816
Dohnjoe wrote: » So they are all real things, it's just you seem to have a problem with human overreactions to these things. Okay. An overreaction is certainly better than an under-reaction.
Dohnjoe wrote: » It would have been larger if we didn't take action, and it's reportedly starting to receed recently thanks to the fact that we took measures
Podge_irl wrote: » And the "joke" you have chosen to emphasis that is in fact an example of your perspective not encompassing the entire view and the actual reality from a larger perspective showing them to be completely correct? Kinda flies in the face of the point you are trying to make, but sure go for it.
padd b1975 wrote: » And her parents, what's their malfunction?
Wanderer78 wrote: » know little or nothing about them, but autism isnt a malfunction, again, its a developmental disorder, and a relatively common one to
Deleted User wrote: » becoming hugely common isnt it