careless sherpa wrote: » Indeed, but bogs are a massive carbon trap and stopping the industrial stripping of peat like that is something that could happen immediately and have an immediate impact. The fact that it continues does not auger well
ToBeFrank123 wrote: » Too many people eating red meat apparently is the problem. There's not much we can do. The EU dictate environmental restrictions for European farmers and consumers, then propose the Mercosur deal with Brazil and similar when they knew rainforest burning would be encouraged by the deal. Much like phasing out single use plastics, we need to phase out our dependence on anything that comes from the Amazon rainforest. Not that counties like China will give a damn, or the US!
kneemos wrote: » England is mostly green fields, despite the huge population. Mostly urban though,less in the way of one off houses and small towns and villages.
Graces7 wrote: » Wise words that at least some of us heed. My fridge and freezer are at least 20 years old and I did not replace my car when it died .. never got the washing machine plumbed in . You soon adapt.
kneemos wrote: » Burn peat or oil? At least peat is local
Feisar wrote: » Aren't you retired living on an island though? Easy saying you don't need a car. Not trying to delve into your circumstances however can I presume you have a pension of some description to live on? The finances that support that come from the current economic system of more more more. Some of your pension fund may be in BMW shares for example. I'm not having a go at you personally, please don't see it like that. However you are a great example of someone living fairly simply but peel back the layers and you are just as complicit as the rest of us.
Xcellor wrote: » So oxygen quotas will be a bit hard to police. Hows about quotas on carbon producing foods. The so called responsible nations should lead by example. Rank all foods based calorific content versus carbon produced. Everyone gets a quota and if you exceed that you pay extra taxes. Extra taxes raised go to Brazil + developing nations to restore rainforests. Problem solved! :cool:
Thelonious Monk wrote: » We've no wilderness in Ireland and very few national parks. Pretty much the whole island is farms, towns, cities and dispersed housing. How is that in the least bit underpopulated???
Dakota Dan wrote: » Did you ever go to Kerry west Cork or up the west coast? Obviously not.
Duffy the Vampire Slayer wrote: » Those aren't examples of wilderness in a global sense. They aren't far from roads and towns. Many of them are used for grazing.
Xcellor wrote: » Most of the poorer nations get the bulk of their calories from plants. They certainly aren't eating brazillian steak. If they were we'd be in even bigger problems...
gozunda wrote: » Nope. You forgot about the carbon foot print of your cheap quinoa berries from Guatemala, lentils from Canada or whatever plant food you consume etc which we don't produce here. I do love the fact that Brazil gets paid to continue doing what its doing while we get taxed even more than at present- and are obliged to eat cheap imported crap to do so. Sounds fair though tbh ...
Xcellor wrote: » So Ireland is incapable of producing its own vegetables grains and legumes? Netherlands seems to be able to grow a lot more than we do. Small country too. So you would be against exporting beef to China then?
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Was in kerry recently. Climbed the reeks.
cjmc wrote: » The future of the planet depends on it but I heard on TV that , even more than the Amazon, algae in the oceans produce more oxygen. So looking after them should be joint 1st on the to do for Earth list
InTheShadows wrote: » Honestly I don't think there is any point in worrying about climate change. Mother nature will take us out eventually when the time suits be it astroid, a plague, super volcano etc... and that's if we don't start a nuclear war first. Not to mention nuclear power itself which has only been around a dot in our existence and we've already had numerous close calls. Why should I care when our leaders definitely do not?
Mr. teddywinkles wrote: » Don't understand what our eu superiors thought was going to happen making that beef deal. Muppets
InTheShadows wrote: » Honestly I don't think there is any point in worrying about climate change. Mother nature will take us out eventually when the time suits be it astroid, a plague, super volcano etc... and that's if we don't start a nuclear war first. Not to mention nuclear power itself which has only been around a dot in our existence and we've already had numerous close calls.Why should I care when our leaders definitely do not?
Graces7 wrote: » [/B] We need to care because our leaders do not. Every major tyrant in history has prospered and grown in power via such attitudes as this. And no such thing as Mother Nature Many natural disasters are avoidable and man made