Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

Blueshoe wrote: »

I'm not going to rewrite comments and replies for your benefit Joey. Let's be realistic here.

Yeah thanks. I have read all of the thread. Your actual point is not clear.

Overheal wrote: »

Says what exactly?

they had the entire thing set up, they told the guy to go there early, show up early themselves to photograph him, then hold on to the material so when people call it a setup that they go 'well here he is earlier' . Theres more photos of that guy before the event than any other participant, bit weird if they didn't even know he was going to do 'the salute'

Is anyone aware if the person doing the salute was there any other day then the one he was photographed on? Would help wrap this debate up.

Blueshoe

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Yeah thanks. I have read all of the thread. Your actual point is not clear.

2,343 posts. Ok yeah you did.

For your benefit Joey.

* O Doherty is mad
* Burning Hijabs isn't good
* Gemma has lots of supporters
*Hiding their faces is a good idea for them

Thrashssacre wrote: »

Is anyone aware if the person doing the salute was there any other day then the one he was photographed on? Would help wrap this debate up.

The high horse doxxing squad hasn’t been able to name him , even people involved int the ‘right’ side of the protest have been asking who he was on twitter, ive never seen any evidence of the guy before , they have more clear photos of him than anyone else, theres the video with the photographer sognalling him .

This unknown guy surrounded by ‘friends’ whos never been seen before just decides that going front and centre doing a salute that nobody else had done prior is a class idea , let everyone photograph it and that side who milkshake people for the craic don’t do anything to him or follow him either. Doesnt line up.

cookie1977

Eric Cartman wrote: »

The high horse doxxing squad hasn’t been able to name him , even people involved int the ‘right’ side of the protest have been asking who he was on twitter, ive never seen any evidence of the guy before , they have more clear photos of him than anyone else, theres the video with the photographer sognalling him .

This unknown guy surrounded by ‘friends’ whos never been seen before just decides that going front and centre doing a salute that nobody else had done prior is a class idea , let everyone photograph it and that side who milkshake people for the craic don’t do anything to him or follow him either. Doesnt line up.

Leaving aside whether he is or isn't part of her group it does not take away an ounce of the vitriol she has dolled out over the past few years. How about explaining away that?

Eric Cartman wrote: »

The high horse doxxing squad hasn’t been able to name him , even people involved int the ‘right’ side of the protest have been asking who he was on twitter, ive never seen any evidence of the guy before , they have more clear photos of him than anyone else, theres the video with the photographer sognalling him .

This unknown guy surrounded by ‘friends’ whos never been seen before just decides that going front and centre doing a salute that nobody else had done prior is a class idea , let everyone photograph it and that side who milkshake people for the craic don’t do anything to him or follow him either. Doesnt line up.

It's fascinating how you try to paint Speakers Unicorner as all violent antifa style doxxers. Thats complete propaganda. They (speakers unicorner) are even actively asking people not to doxx Gemmas home or protest outside it.

cookie1977 wrote: »

Leaving aside whether he is or isn't part of her group it does not take away an ounce of the vitriol she has dolled out over the past few years. How about explaining away that?

because we started with one mentally ill woman who's mad for conspiracy theories, some racist, some just obscure. then we added in some fans of hers. Then it snowballed to unconfirmed sightings of 'super racist' justin barrett and a plant throwing around salutes.

This entire event has been one nutter woman and her agenda, rolled up into 'the rise of nazi'ism in Ireland' which is blown completely out of proportion.

Eric Cartman wrote: »

because we started with one mentally ill woman who's mad for conspiracy theories, some racist, some just obscure. then we added in some fans of hers. Then it snowballed to unconfirmed sightings of 'super racist' justin barrett and a plant throwing around salutes.

This entire event has been one nutter woman and her agenda, rolled up into 'the rise of nazi'ism in Ireland' which is blown completely out of proportion.

You seem to have missed the parts where she did numerous youtube videos with Justin Barrett and James Reynolds. And also the very much confirmed videos of Justin Barrett at Barrow Street.

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

You seem to have missed the parts where she did numerous youtube videos with Justin Barrett and James Reynolds. And also the very much confirmed videos of Justin Barrett at Barrow Street.

Yes I'm confused on that claim about Barrett, he's been in her YouTube channel in past as well. They're good buddies by looks of things. Cartman seems to be going the conspiracy route for the sake of pretending some non bat**** far right exists in Ireland.

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

You seem to have missed the parts where she did numerous youtube videos with Justin Barrett and James Reynolds. And also the very much confirmed videos of Justin Barrett at Barrow Street.

where are the videos of barrett at barrow st ? not being obtuse, I just havent seen any evidence he was actually there.

Justin’s has been around quite a while now though I mean his presence is hardly that alarming is it?

Eric Cartman wrote: »

where are the videos of barrett at barrow st ? not being obtuse, I just havent seen any evidence he was actually there.

He was there a few of the days I think.

[Deleted User]

Regardless of what side the chap was on, I find it unbelievable that he hasn't been identified yet.

Eric Cartman wrote: »

where are the videos of barrett at barrow st ? not being obtuse, I just havent seen any evidence he was actually there.

Here you go

https://twitter.com/tvcritics/status/1161019483886096384?s=19

batgoat wrote: »

Yes I'm confused on that claim about Barrett, he's been in her YouTube channel in past as well. They're good buddies by looks of things. Cartman seems to be going the conspiracy route for the sake of pretending some non bat**** far right exists in Ireland.

I know. I dont why Eric Caryman is now attempting to airbrush Justin Barrett out of the picture. Justin Barrett and Gemma O'Doherty have built a clear public alliance.

batgoat wrote: »

Here you go

Thats that one settled so cheers. People just like randomly claiming he's at events but I cant argue this one.

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Thats that one settled so cheers. People just like randomly claiming he's at events but I cant argue this one.

Not only that, it also supports that the crowd were cheering on some pretty vile remarks...

I honestly don’t get the point of the alliance considering they both have their own parties, seems a bit odd.

https://youtu.be/4FbOls0rMLs

https://twitter.com/NationalPartyIE/status/1152307255783673865?s=19

Gemma must be one of the few people that Barrett feels tall standing next to... :P

Thrashssacre wrote: »

I honestly don’t get the point of the alliance considering they both have their own parties, seems a bit odd.

Ah its really trying to bring all the far right together. Grand Torino suggested sometime back bringing ACI, NP, Irexit, DDI (snd Renua I think) all together.

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Ah its really trying to bring all the far right together. Grand Torino suggested sometime back bringing ACI, NP, Irexit, DDI (snd Renua I think) all together.

Makes sense in a way but irexit and the national party have completely different views vis a vie Eu membership so that’d be kind of a non runner I’d image.

Thrashssacre wrote: »

Makes sense in a way but irexit and the national party have completely different views vis a vie Eu membership so that’d be kind of a non runner I’d image.

I wouldnt have thought they did have different views to be honest.

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

I wouldnt have thought they did have different views to be honest.

National party are pro Eu membership

gmisk

Thrashssacre wrote: »

National party are pro Eu membership

True but they are eurosceptic, they also want to leave the Eurozone.
I'd have thought clumping ACI, national party and renua into one is the only way they might actually get any seats tbh

gmisk wrote: »

True but they are eurosceptic, they also want to leave the Eurozone.
I'd have thought clumping ACI, national party and renua into one is the only way they might actually get any seats tbh

I dont even think renua is a right fit, theyre economic conservatives who happen to be pro life, not quite the same as these lot.

gmisk

Eric Cartman wrote: »

I dont even think renua is a right fit, theyre economic conservatives who happen to be pro life, not quite the same as these lot.

Possibly not on some issues true, but they are polling below 1 percent I think themselves.