Ecce No Homo wrote: » it's a very, very sick world out there folks. the entertainment business mixing with top levels of government and financial system, all governmened by pedophiles and compromosied people. and that is before you look into the occult aspects.
tuxy wrote: » People laughed when David Icke talked about the shape-shifting lizard world rulers, has he been vindicated?
Eric Cartman wrote: » Just f*cking what mate. You cant be serious
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » I don't get you? He didn't shoot up a school, and wasn't some brutal serial rapist. When you see videos of these girls coming and going from his house you see them smiling on the way in and out, you see them looking for him. Yes it was manipulation, and they were underage, but they were 16/17, not 6 and 7. In the eyes of the law he did wrong, and was rightly charged, I'm just saying he wasn't the worst criminal in the world. Didn't deserve the ending he got, just because he paid some late teenage girls for a massage. He wasn't some priest raping 5 year old's, in eyes of the law it's all the same, but come on, it's different, I'm sure he had 20 year olds, 21 year olds, 19, year olds mixed in with the 16 year olds, and the 17 year olds. ''Young women'' as Trump put it. But he broke the law, and had info on others who did too. That is why he is dead.
tuxy wrote: » The court documents from his previous trial has info on two 8 year old girls he asked one of his assistants to find for him. So it's not so bad because at least they wernt 5 and some were even as old as early 20's!
jobless wrote: » why are beating up on those school shooters all of a sudden?... sure they werent as bad as hitler... leave them alone
Nolan Savory Warden wrote: » If a picture could speak a thousand words, the this from JE's gaff back in 2010 (as featured in the Mail) below would be the one. . . . .
zanador wrote: » Having read the entire thread, loads of conspiracy theories and researched thoroughly I have decided that I don't give a toss who killed Epstein I only care that we are living in a world where the sex-traffickers of 14+ year old girls rule us. I don't think anyone can say that this is someone else's problem, this is close to us, these are western leaders, movers and shakers. Who killed Epstein, don't care - my thoughts and wishes are to all those wee children who were manipulated and abused. (That includes women in their early 20s for me too - I definitely didn't have a clue at that age)
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » In all fairness I don't know any more details than the ones I do know. I only heard of these late teen girls and massages. I should take the time to read these court documents, I did read one where a 13 year old jane doe claimed Trump was at and Epstein party, and Trump raped her and threatened her if she told. This was a story told under oat. But so many of these stories are made up. No newspaper would have nerve to print these stories as they don't add up, they claim people are in one location, when they were on other side of world on that date. A lot of smoke and mirrors in these stories.
Tony EH wrote: » People laughed because he REALLY believed these people were actual lizards and they were right to laugh too. Just because stopped clocks like Icke and Alex Jones get some things correct some of the time. It doesn't make them worth listening to all of the time.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » If Prince Andrew set foot in States he'd be arrested on the spot. He's clearly involved or at least has info.
Tony EH wrote: » . . . A lot of people are asking questions at the moment. But, they're questions based on hot air, to be honest, and until there's a proper case, with bona fide evidence, involved on any of Epstein's associates, friends or acquaintances, that's the way it'll remain.
In 2011, she revealed that she received £15,000 from the billionaire to help clear some of her debts. In an attempt to defend Prince Andrew, 59, against allegations that he had helped negotiate the payment, she appeared to drag him further into the controversy by saying: "The Duke sorted out my debts," adding the deal had been agreed "through the Duke's office". She later issued a clarification in which she said she had dealt directly with Epstein over nine months and denied that her ex-husband or his staff had negotiated the payment.source
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » The trouble is only a few girls spoke out, 1000's more enjoyed the sugar daddy ride and will never say anything negative about Epstein or Andrew or the other high rollers.
Tony EH wrote: » Nobody ever gets arrested for having "info". Nor do they get arrested for being friends with somebody. The fact of the matter is that there is no actual case against Andrew or most of the others that Epstein was associated with and without a solid case, nobody is going to waste their time. What's going to happen here is that randy Andy will keep a low profile and, eventually, this story will just go away. A lot of people are asking questions at the moment. But, they're questions based on hot air, to be honest, and until there's a proper case, with bona fide evidence, involved on any of Epstein's associates, friends or acquaintances, that's the way it'll remain.
Tony EH wrote: » A lot of people are asking questions at the moment. But, they're questions based on hot air, to be honest, and until there's a proper case, with bona fide evidence, involved on any of Epstein's associates, friends or acquaintances, that's the way it'll remain.
ceadaoin. wrote: » I remember you were on one of the michael jackson threads too claiming that even if he did abuse kids it wasn't that bad because it was "love". Wtf like? Im sensing a theme with your posts.
