Tell me how wrote: » Why do you dislike her so much, it seems to go way beyond disagreement. You think I am being deliberately naive, what do you think your position comes across as?
SafeSurfer wrote: » Attack the people making the argument, not the argument. You are doing exactly what posters attacking Greta have been criticized for. Complete hypocrisy.
joe40 wrote: » You keep describing her message as hysteria. You come across as someone that is deperate to attack the message, so instead attack the messenger. If she was simply some silly little teenager, she would not have this exposure in international media.Unless of course the climate change thing is all a hoax and majority of the world's government are in on it.Infowars stuff.
gozunda wrote: » If it sounds like a duck and walks like a duck - then the chances are it's a duck. But no many people are labelling gretas public spoutings as hysteria and not just people here.http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/24226https://motls.blogspot.com/2019/03/greta-thunberg-when-discussion-becomes.html?m=1 As to attacking the messenger - Yup that's exactly what you are doing. You may not like others being objective about what the child greta does or says and discussing same. But I can't help you with that.
micosoft wrote: » SafeSurfer wrote: » Attack the people making the argument, not the argument. You are doing exactly what posters attacking Greta have been criticized for. Complete hypocrisy. Let me get this right. I should address an argument to the people personally attacking Greta? Through the looking glass here.
Tell me how wrote: » You really going to post sh*t like that in the same post as talking being objective?The byline from the second website literally says that it is posting from a conservative viewpoint. And the first Israeli website seems more eager to denigrate her because of her attending the French Parliament. A collapsing country's parliament prostrated itself grotesquely before a teenager in shorts."You're right about the duck analogy.....
gozunda wrote: » They're only two examples of many many such opinions that gretas spoutings are indeed hysteria. Do you not understand that? But because a source may not suit your extreme left wing bias - you get to ignore it lol. You've been posting non stop and replying and throwing mud at every single comment that points out the problems and issue with gretas mad march. And as for ducks let's introduce another analogy - pots- specifically pots and kettles. You claim other posters are getting erratic in yet another one of your daft in-thread personalisations and attacks. The problem is you haven't put forward one single argument which shows that the criticisms others have detailed in thread are not correct. You are just appear to be magically flag waving and come across as knowing nothing about the topic tbh. So I would suggest you put down your phone or laptop or whatever and walk away from the huge hole you've dug yourself before you fall in completely.
Tell me how wrote: » Hello pot, kettle here.
Tell me how wrote: » Nice work using the pot kettle analogy, I did the same a few hours ago.Further evidence you are either not reading, or not understanding the arguments here.
hetuzozaho wrote: » A drone shot of the yacht. Nice!https://twitter.com/borisherrmann/status/1163191146736234500?s=09 Day 6 now. Almost half way there. Here is the live tracker of the yacht: https://www.windy.com/greta-thunberg
gozunda wrote: » Looks quite a bit less than half wat tbh. I believe the estimate was approximately 2 weeks travel as they are against the wind. Also looks they had to make some serious detours to avoid a huge storm in their direct path. Some other serious looking weather out there tbh.
gozunda wrote: » Further evidence I think you do not understand what is being said by many many posters here And you see that's not an arguement. It's an analogy - as was pointed out to you previously and you have repeated here - so 1 out if 10 for that at least. And it was pointed our to you because of the repeated attacks on those you do not agree with But as I said that kind of stuff is basic 101 comprehension.
Blueshoe wrote: » Take the bus instead of driving to avoid a tax Reality: there is no bus
Portsalon wrote: » I haven't been following the transatlantic junketing of the Norwegian bint with much interest, but as I lowered my third bottle of Black's delicious KPA last night I idly wondered what the main difference is between her and Chicken Licken. Rack my brains as I might, I couldn't answer that question to my satisfaction. Can anyone help?
Tell me how wrote: » 3 bottles of Black's KPA is about your limit I'd say.
Portsalon wrote: » It's any sensible drinker's limit. Although I did top it off with a large glass of Roe's, which is a really nice whiskey. All in all, it was a nice way to commemorate my XXth wedding anniversary. I wonder will young Greta ever find a man (or woman) stupid enough to marry her.
Portsalon wrote: » I wonder will young Greta ever find a man (or woman) stupid enough to marry her.
Tell me how wrote: » I have probably the most posts on this thread at this point. I have asked several posters why they are annoyed and gotten a variety of answers including that Greta is being manipulated, that it is child endangerment, their disbelief that climate change is abnormal, their disbelief that humans are responsible, that they just don't give a f*ck and that they are jealous.You have given no answer. Stating repeatedly that I must accept your arguments posted here does not mean I have to, or that I do. You, for all your posts (probably high up on the post count here yourself), are still in the category of I don't know what you are saying other than that you are outraged.Asking someone to defend or explain their position is not attacking them.
gozunda wrote: » No **** sherlock. Yes indeed you do. And yes you have attempted to dominate the entire thread. Plenty of people have given reasoned arguments why the figurehead of the child greta is not something to be feted for very many reasons. And not just your list of trite and rather stupid attacks. You really have not read what anyone havs posted if you hilariously believe they have not given a range of referenced and detailed arguments why this so. But continue attacking every other poster who you do not agree with. And it is not jusylt me saying that bte. Continue misreporting what they are saying. Continue attempt to dominate and drown out every single comment anyone has posted here with utter bile and you'll get untold the same again and again. None of it washes. Tbh the more you go on in that vein - the more ridiculous your comments have become. The fact is you have not provided a single valid argument in support of the child greta. And that's where we at. If the truth hurts - then I feel tuely sorry for you.
Tell me how wrote: » Still don't know what your argument is.
gozunda wrote: » Hint: read the actual thread and try and understand the ongoing discussion. It might help. I leave you at it.
hetuzozaho wrote: » Yes struggling to zoom out on phone there. Looks round a third maybe on map? Was think almost half way purely by days. So will be a bit longer by the looks! Be some experience!
Tell me how wrote: » Read it already and asked questions where I wanted to understand what someone was saying. Got answers from many.Except from one......
