prawnsambo wrote: » I stopped at "personal and corporate tax rates". Impressive to get so many things wrong in one sentence. So would you like to short-circuit the merriment and actually quote the actual laws that you imagine came from the EU? You know, links to statute law and EU directives.
brickster69 wrote: » It is not a mobile add on. You can roam for free anywhere if your carrier has a network in another country which they all do. If the UK left the EU all the carriers would offer it for free. It costs them nothing at all.
If the UK leaves without a deal, Culture Secretary Jeremy Wright has confirmed that mobile operators will be able to implement roaming charges if they want to. But he added that the government would be legislating to put a £45-a-month limit on the amount that customers could be charged for using mobile data abroad.
prawnsambo wrote: » As the pre-eminent producer of garbage on here, that's a bit.
prawnsambo wrote: » And there's already been agreement on beef quotas.
prawnsambo wrote: » No they don't. Three, for example only have networks in operation in Hong Kong, Macau, Austria, Denmark, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
brickster69 wrote: » Three own Moviesta
Enzokk wrote: » Yes, as it currently stands they would offer it for free on Brexit day plus 1. But what about Brexit day plus 365? Can you guarantee they will not start charging again? Because the government could not and wanted to legislate that mobile providers limit the cost for roaming.Mobile roaming charges: What will happen in Europe after Brexit? So it is up to the companies whether to charge, I would like to know why you are so confident they will not start charging again?
CrabRevolution wrote: » I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume that poster was being sarcastic.
brickster69 wrote: » Of course. But 3 have been doing it before the Eu introduced it and globally. Obvious to say whichever company decided to continue it, would absolutely clean up on all new contracts.
prawnsambo wrote: » No they haven't. I've been with three for over a decade and they absolutely didn't have free roaming. In fact in 2016, I was charged an arm and a leg for data roaming in France. And as I have pointed out, Three do not have global coverage. Not even close.
gooch2k9 wrote: » They have had some form since at least 2013 anyway. I used it for first few weeks after moving to NI back then. Someone listed Three's countries and I don't think France was on it so that may explain it? It's irrelevant though as pointed out, it allows free roaming on their network only. Not the same as the EU directive(which is a godsend in my experience!).
brickster69 wrote: » Not absolutely global coverage but quite a lot of non EU countries. They did have this available for quite a long time before the EU laws were brought in. It was not widely advertised but it is a matter of going into your account and ticking a box.I can't remember the name of it but it was free and still is.
prawnsambo wrote: » Not absolutely global? They're not in the US, Canada, South America, Japan, China or Russia to start with. That's wiping out a hell of a lot of the globe right there. And they're not in a large number of EU countries either. You couldn't even say they were 'almost' global.
Headshot wrote: » It's going to be intriguing to see what Corbyn is going to do with the "time limited national government" Corbyn is far to devise character to get votes from Tory rebels and Lib Dems wont vote for him. Will he do what's best for the country or will he have the blinkers on going down with this sinking ship. Personally if Corbyn stepped a side and pushed labour votes behind Clarke my estimation of Corbyn would sky rocket but I cannot see it happening. It's been a long time since UK Politicians have done something for the greater good of their country rather than their party or personal glories.
brickster69 wrote: » It is. The EU said it was the best deal on offer. So now instead o getting the best deal they get the worst deal possible. Way to go EU !
brickster69 wrote: » Yes, for EU laws not to be higher than UK laws.
fash wrote: » It was the best deal on offer. The next deal will be a surrender agreement with whatever parts of the UK that remain - requiring the UK to comply with the same terms but incur more cost to compensate for not taking the "best deal" and limiting the backstop to NI only.
PropJoe10 wrote: » Corbyn and the other opposition leaders need to decide and decide fast what they're going to support to stop No Deal. It's not like they have a load of time. To me, it's going to take someone like Ken Clarke on a very temporary basis to unite enough MPs to defeat No Deal. Corbyn is so divisive that Tories will never row in behind him. Clarke has the respect of the entire house and would be ideal on a limited timeframe - but, it's very hard to see it happening.
