nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Liverpool FC Team Talk, Gossip, Rumours 2019/2020

SlickRic

Our year.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Negative_G wrote: »

Hilarious. That spelling always gets me.

Spelling his name backwards, so creative. Bound to generate at least 1-2 likes.

Yeah, thanks for resolving that. Honestly had no idea who he was talking about.

marklazarcovic

Speak Now wrote: »

11 league wins on the bounce, place will be in turmoil when pts are eventually dropped. 1 defeat in 41 league games.

And city's first dropped points in a longer period,shows what we are up against again. 11 wins equals club record too

dmigsy

SlickRic wrote: »

Ox is a vital squad member.

His directness from central positions takes a pace, strength and bravery that few have. It scared and hurt City the season before last.

He's potentially a vital squad member. He has to stay fit and do the business consistently before he becomes vital. Definitely offers something extra when he's on it.

dmigsy

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

You'd think we lost the dam game there is so much of an inquest.

Human nature. People get used to excellence. Liverpool fans have little to complain about so any imperfections are magnified. The quality of the team now is higher than at any point since Dalglish left the first time. It's a fantastic time to be a Liverpool supporter. It's still fun to pick holes and normal to fret about potential weaknesses.

dmigsy

ush wrote: »

If his ankle is that bad why was he picked?

Because Andy Lonergan

Vicxas

Speak Now wrote: »

11 league wins on the bounce, place will be in turmoil when pts are eventually dropped. 1 defeat in 41 league games.

Im looking forward to it, we haven't had a good "Klopp out" rant in a while.

[Deleted User]

ebbsy wrote: »

Goooooooaaaaaaa...........

NOT

Yeah, those Spanish commentators had it right all along. Gives them time to correct themselves.

GoooooooooooooooooGooooooooooooooooooooooGoooooooooooooooooooooGoooooooooooooooooooooooNoooahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

Speak Now

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

You'd think we lost the dam game there is so much of an inquest.

11 league wins on the bounce, place will be in turmoil when pts are eventually dropped. 1 defeat in 41 league games.

Iused2likebusts

Didn't see any of the game but that is a brilliant 3 pts.

BorneTobyWilde

You'd think we lost the dam game there is so much of an inquest.

BorneTobyWilde

ush wrote: »

If his ankle is that bad why was he picked?

Eh why are you asking me, I didn't pick team. Klopp said after game that the defenders should not have passed back to Adrian so much, that they take part the blame for his mistake
'' why pass back to keeper, you hoping the painkillers are working and he could kick it?''

Klopp said something like this.

Negative_G

Turtyturd wrote: »

There’s only one Harry Maguire. And he wouldn’t even get in ahead of Nervol.

Hilarious. That spelling always gets me.

Spelling his name backwards, so creative. Bound to generate at least 1-2 likes.

Turtyturd

gimli2112 wrote: »

He's no Harry Maguire

There’s only one Harry Maguire. And he wouldn’t even get in ahead of Nervol.

gimli2112

Turtyturd wrote: »

The surprising thing here is people taking the VVD thing seriously.

He's no Harry Maguire

fullstop

joe_99 wrote: »

Vvd backpass wasn't on target. He played to Adrian whose position was centre of the goal. If Adrian missed it it would have went wide. If Adrian was standing wide of the goal I'm sure VVD would have passed it there.

I’m not the one arguing he should have played it wide of the goal. There was no issue with the pas either way.

MarkY91

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

I hate pass the buck football, and VVD should have just dealt with it. Might as well clear it yourself. Klopp said as much after game, '' why are defenders playing it back to Adrain who has a swollen ankle and can't kick'' makes no sense. I get your point though.

So what was he doing on the pitch if he wasn't fit to kick a ball?

Turtyturd

The surprising thing here is people taking the VVD thing seriously.

joe_99

fullstop wrote: »

It wouldn't though. The reason you play a backpass wide of the goal goes back to the old days of **** pitches and the chance of the ball bobbling when the keeper swung at it and dribbling into the net (think Gary Neville's OG for England a number of years back). There's no issue playing a backpass like VVD did on target. Adrian is (presumably) right-footed so playing it wide of the goal on the near side would have made it more difficult for him as he either has to play it left footed or take a touch to get it back on his right foot.

Vvd backpass wasn't on target. He played to Adrian whose position was centre of the goal. If Adrian missed it it would have went wide. If Adrian was standing wide of the goal I'm sure VVD would have passed it there.

RugbyLover123

Adrian was being cocky, trying to play the more difficult pass. You can’t really blame him for how his last 2 weeks have gone.

ush

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

I hate pass the buck football, and VVD should have just dealt with it. Might as well clear it yourself. Klopp said as much after game, '' why are defenders playing it back to Adrain who has a swollen ankle and can't kick'' makes no sense. I get your point though.

If his ankle is that bad why was he picked?

Osmosis Jones

Absolutely nothing wrong with VVD's pass, Ings isn't even in the box when Adrian receives the ball he had all the time in the world.

BorneTobyWilde

fullstop wrote: »

It wouldn't though. The reason you play a backpass wide of the goal goes back to the old days of **** pitches and the chance of the ball bobbling when the keeper swung at it and dribbling into the net (think Gary Neville's OG for England a number of years back). There's no issue playing a backpass like VVD did on target. Adrian is (presumably) right-footed so playing it wide of the goal on the near side would have made it more difficult for him as he either has to play it left footed or take a touch to get it back on his right foot.

I hate pass the buck football, and VVD should have just dealt with it. Might as well clear it yourself. Klopp said as much after game, '' why are defenders playing it back to Adrain who has a swollen ankle and can't kick'' makes no sense. I get your point though.

Charlie19

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

If Adrian received ball wide of goal then it's most likely that when Adrian played his clearance on to Ings foot that the ball would have went wide, not into the goal. Anyway we won, doesn't matter now.

Its early in the season and thats all that counts.

fullstop

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

If Adrian received ball wide of goal then it's most likely that when Adrian played his clearance on to Ings foot that the ball would have went wide, not into the goal. Anyway we won, doesn't matter now.

It wouldn't though. The reason you play a backpass wide of the goal goes back to the old days of **** pitches and the chance of the ball bobbling when the keeper swung at it and dribbling into the net (think Gary Neville's OG for England a number of years back). There's no issue playing a backpass like VVD did on target. Adrian is (presumably) right-footed so playing it wide of the goal on the near side would have made it more difficult for him as he either has to play it left footed or take a touch to get it back on his right foot.

BorneTobyWilde

If Adrian received ball wide of goal then it's most likely that when Adrian played his clearance on to Ings foot that the ball would have went wide, not into the goal. Anyway we won, doesn't matter now.

fullstop

BorneTobyWilde wrote: »

I was worried he'd try to put foot on it and miss and it would roll into empty net, but something as bad happened. But still if you play it wide of goal it's not likely to end up in net with a deflection .

What were you actually on about here? If he plays it wide of the goal and the keeper puts his foot on it, smashes it off the striker and into the net is different to what happened, how?

mikeym

Im delighted City dropped points today.

Ken Tucky

.G. wrote: »

Its impossible to judge intention so the rule as it is now is the most sensible option.

Yep but my point is it's nonsense.
We love the game, millions love the game. Stop introducing these new rules just to try appease the twitter fools.
We all have played/play the game, sometimes the ball hits you..not fair to call handball in every situation.
One day a major trophy will hinge on this...i hope it's not us on the receiving end

Talisman

martyos121 wrote: »

Is it just my imagination or did he actually start a game there last season? Can’t remember which one, but I have a vague feeling he didn’t shine there.

Henderson played as the right back in the game against Leicester.

Osmosis Jones

martyos121 wrote: »

Is it just my imagination or did he actually start a game there last season? Can’t remember which one, but I have a vague feeling he didn’t shine there.

He definitely played games as a wingback for Arsenal, it was his post-game interview after a game at left back that he said he wants to move into midfield and be the next Stevie G.