kingshankly wrote: » It’s like city have extra players they have such an aggressive press
FixdePitchmark wrote: » Watching them - reminds you how much we have left that type of game behind (pool) - we look very slow versus them now.
Osmosis Jones wrote: » Our second goal today came from us winning the ball on the edge of Southampton's box.
kingshankly wrote: » I have yet to see this winks lad play a decent match wouldn’t get near out side
rgace wrote: » I wonder if Salah is great at free kicks in training, I can't remember him ever hitting a good one. Always seems to be a delicate clip that has no hope of beating the keeper.
kingshankly wrote: » That’s possibly the best 45 minutes of football I have seen from a side Spurs have probably got out of their halve 4/5 times at most it’s absolute domination from city how it’s only 2-1 is baffling
Starfleet Student wrote: » Any chance all the fawning over City could be done in the City thread or the general thread I prefer to read about Liverpool in here.
rossie1977 wrote: » Spurs spent heavily over the summer and didn't lose anyone yet still only have one difference maker on the bench.
Potential Underachiever wrote: » City in beast mode so far, that's the standard we're dealing with.
Potential Underachiever wrote: » Tricky road to go down, you were talking about grammar and The Simpsons earlier.
Starfleet Student wrote: » Forgive me please! I only just got the memo that every post must be cleared by you since you are the Godfather of the thread and its moral compass.
Vicxas wrote: » And why didn't we keep Wilson?